SEX OBSESSION AND THE DEMOCRATS

from JoeUser Forums
Why are the Democrats so obsessed with sex? It seems like every time you watch the news, some Democrat is involved with something sexual. And all to often, it involves perversion and sodomy. The republicans take sex in stride. Sex is a normal part of life and they keep their personal lives private. Generally, Republicans believe in fidelity and marriage. The Democrats, on the other hand, seem to accept every sick perversion that comes along and advocate fornication involving many partners. Democrats even think that sex should start at ages as young as twelve. What kind of terribly evil young people will we have in our country six or eight years from now if the Democrats gain more power? Young people today are immoral enough without blatantly teaching them to be so evil from such an early age. Here are some things the Democrats want to allow.

CONTRACEPTIVES GIVEN TO SIXTH GRADERS.
TEACHING OF PERVERTED SEX ACTS TO FORTH GRADERS.
TEACHING THAT HOMOSEXUALITY IS NORMAL TO FIRST GRADERS.
TEACHING TWELVE YEAR OLDS HOW TO HAVE ORAL SEX.
TEACHING YOUNG TEENS HOW TO HAVE SEX WITH MULTIPLE PARTNERS.
TEACHING YOUNG TEENS HOW TO HAVE ANAL SEX (SODOMY).

These are just some of the disgusting things the liberal, pro-democratic, teachers union wants to do. God help us if the Democrats ever regain power!!!
politics
28,766 views 47 replies
Reply #1 from JoeUser Forums Top
Generally, Republicans believe in fidelity and marriage:

Ronald Reagan - divorced the mother of two of his children to marry Nancy Reagan who bore him a daughter 7 months after the marriage.
Bob Dole - divorced the mother of his child, who had nursed him through the long recovery from his war wounds.
Newt Gingrich - divorced his wife who was dying of cancer.
Dick Armey - House Majority Leader - divorced.
Senator Phil Gramm of Texas - divorced.
Governor John Engler of Michigan - divorced.
Governor Pete Wilson of California - divorced.
George Will - divorced.
Senator Lauch Faircloth - divorced.
Rush Limbaugh - and his current wife, Marta, have six marriages and four divorces between them.

Senator Bob Barr of Georgia - not yet 50 years old, has been married three times. He had the audacity to author and push the "Defense of Marriage Act" The current joke making the rounds on Capitol Hill is "Bob Barr - WHICH marriage are you defending?!?)

Senator Alfonse D'Amato of New York - divorced.
Senator John Warner of Virginia - once married to Liz Taylor
Governor George Allen of Virginia - divorced.
Representative Helen Chenoweth of Idaho - divorced.
Senator John McCain of Arizona - divorced.
Representative John Kasich of Ohio - divorced.

Good thing you put "generally" in there.

IG
Reply #2 from JoeUser Forums Top

Governor John Engler of Michigan

The Governor of Michigan is Jennifer Granholm Put I know the mass email that you are referring to.....

Marvin, do you have any published proof of your claims?

Elemental: Reforged
Reply #3 from JoeUser Forums Top
Y'wanna know why Dems seem so "perverted"? It's because their opponents keep bringing up their sex lives instead of discussing the relevant issues. Was Clinton a bad president? You know he wasn't, because they destroyed his integrity by making such a big deal of all his sexual misconducts. I'm not saying I condone his infidelity, but I think there are bigger things to worry about.

And the "liberal media" jumps all over it.

Republicans, as was noted, have just as many fidelity problems as Dems. The Dems are just too accepting about sexual preference to use it as a negative.
Reply #4 from JoeUser Forums Top
So I take it you're a Democrat then Marvin...?
Reply #5 from JoeUser Forums Top
Mr. Cooley,

Sex is not by nature immoral or evil.

VES
Reply #6 from JoeUser Forums Top
TEACHING YOUNG TEENS HOW TO HAVE SEX WITH MULTIPLE PARTNERS.
TEACHING YOUNG TEENS HOW TO HAVE ANAL SEX (SODOMY).


Hmm...I'm a teen, and i'm a democrat, and I don't think that the Dem Party has taught me these things.
Reply #7 from JoeUser Forums Top

TEACHING YOUNG TEENS HOW TO HAVE SEX WITH MULTIPLE PARTNERS.

I'd like clarification on this one- is that at the same time, or separately?  It really does make a difference.

Reply #8 from JoeUser Forums Top
Democrats wants same sex mariage which republicans are against. I think marriage is between a man and a woman point blank. Kerry will make all 50 states to allow same sex marriage.
Reply #9 from JoeUser Forums Top
Actually Kerry has said he opposes gay marriage, but favors civil unions for gays. (He also opposes amending the constitution to ban gay marriages.)
Reply #10 from JoeUser Forums Top

favors civil unions for gays. (He also opposes amending the constitution to ban gay marriages.)

Yeah, I think that is a sensible approach.  Convincing congress might not be as easy.  It's not like the President has ultimate power, that's why we have a checks and balance system.  Damn...I shouldn't say any of that....I forgot that I can't have liberal views.....

Reply #12 from JoeUser Forums Top
favors civil unions for gays. (He also opposes amending the constitution to ban gay marriages.)

Yeah, I think that is a sensible approach. Convincing congress might not be as easy. It's not like the President has ultimate power, that's why we have a checks and balance system. Damn...I shouldn't say any of that....I forgot that I can't have liberal views.....


Seems to me like people who are interesting in creating 'Civil Unions' are doing more to harm marriage than those who want to extend it to homosexuals. I'm not particularly pro-marriage (although I have absolutely nothing against it), so I'm kind of hoping civil unions WILL prevail. When that happens, marriage will actually become less popular as progressive-leaning heterosexual couples choose the politically correct model. It could conceivable become a model for less binding relationships (although it will have to be equal), or relationships that are sanctified in non-traditional ways with non traditional ceremonies. Granted most heterosexuals would still marry, but even losing 10 or 15 percent would do more harm to the institution than if it grew 2% more inclusive. It will be interesting to see how this plays out. Will some churches, for example, refuse to give civil unions to heterosexuals, even if technically they are still 'man and wife'?

I would think that people who are really concerned about marriage would say yes to gay marriage, social leftists who do not like the message of marriage would say yes to civil unions, and most homosexuals would prefer just to keep marriage and not be associated with its demise. People who simply despise gays should relentlessly oppose both civil unions and gay marriages, but they aren't going to win this fight. Marriage is on the line, but its not for the reason that most people think.

Reply #13 from JoeUser Forums Top
These 6 proposals are acually real ideas that came from a California think tank. They are Democratic liberals. No lie!!!
Reply #14 from JoeUser Forums Top
Marvin, thank you for bringing some sunshine and laughter to my day.

Personally, I'd love to have really evil sex with multiple partners of the female kind every single day of my life, so I hope Kerry gets elected. Surely, he will lead a big gay multiple evil sex parade down 5th avenue and open many liberal Universities for Really Evil Sex.

I'd try to enroll in a heartbeat, although I fear the good lady would be against it. Bah. Would that make me a Republican though?
Reply #15 from JoeUser Forums Top
ACUALLY, IT SHOULD BE CALLED A MORON TANK. LIBERALS HAVE GOT TO BE THE DUMBEST IDIOTS SINCE THE BEGINNING OF TIME. I MEAN IF YOU CAN BELIEVE A FRAUD LIKE EVOLUTION, YOU GOT TO BE A NAIVE MORON. MAYBE A GOOD NAME FOR THE DEMOCRATS IS, "CARNIVAL BARKERS AND SNAKE OIL SALESMEN"!!!
Reply #16 from JoeUser Forums Top
no thats the name that should be given to amway...owned, operated and promoted by the kind of people who advocate your unique political perspective... im sure youd find them worthy of salvation
Reply #17 from JoeUser Forums Top
i truly wish i still had access to a series of photos published with my captions in 1983 that showed former congressman larry macdonald (r-ga) and head of the john birch society cavorting nude with two equally nude women (neither of whom were his current wife at that time) while in office. to make the presentation as objective as possible, i juxtaposed them with pix of macdonald assisting the rev jerry falwell in his ministerial duties.

it might prove a most enlightening epiphany
Reply #18 from JoeUser Forums Top
I MEAN IF YOU CAN BELIEVE A FRAUD LIKE EVOLUTION, YOU GOT TO BE A NAIVE MORON


So true. If God had been a Democrat, I'm pretty sure Adam and Eve would have been having evil gay sex all the time with multiple partners and..... erm.... wait.....

You forgot LIBERALS ARE IN FAVOR OF TEACHING SECOND GRADERS BEASTIALITY.
Reply #19 from JoeUser Forums Top
So true. If God had been a Democrat, I'm pretty sure Adam and Eve would have been having evil gay sex all the time with multiple partners and..... erm.... wait.....


Shouldn't that be Adam and Steve?
Reply #20 from JoeUser Forums Top
How about Ellen and Eve?

IG
Reply #21 from JoeUser Forums Top

Seems to me like people who are interesting in creating 'Civil Unions' are doing more to harm marriage than those who want to extend it to homosexuals. I'm not particularly pro-marriage (although I have absolutely nothing against it), so I'm kind of hoping civil unions WILL prevail. When that happens, marriage will actually become less popular as progressive-leaning heterosexual couples choose the politically correct model. It could conceivable become a model for less binding relationships (although it will have to be equal), or relationships that are sanctified in non-traditional ways with non traditional ceremonies. Granted most heterosexuals would still marry, but even losing 10 or 15 percent would do more harm to the institution than if it grew 2% more inclusive. It will be interesting to see how this plays out. Will some churches, for example, refuse to give civil unions to heterosexuals, even if technically they are still 'man and wife'?

I would think that people who are really concerned about marriage would say yes to gay marriage, social leftists who do not like the message of marriage would say yes to civil unions, and most homosexuals would prefer just to keep marriage and not be associated with its demise. People who simply despise gays should relentlessly oppose both civil unions and gay marriages, but they aren't going to win this fight. Marriage is on the line, but its not for the reason that most people think.


Actually, I think that would be good for marriage. That way, less people would be getting married and divorcing, thereby tainting the tradition.

Reply #22 from JoeUser Forums Top
Actually, I think that would be good for marriage. That way, less people would be getting married and divorcing, thereby tainting the tradition.


Well you'll have to inform me about the rapid fluctuation in the sanctity of marriage in the coming years, since those who are not initiated into the game of moral sanctimony and holier than thou preachiness will not have their finger on the pulse of marriage - apparently statistics are meaningless. The time of American cultural solidarity has long since passed. That said, I'm not going to waste my time advocating gay marriage for the sake of 'harmony' when the wave of the future is obviously secular and religious civil unions in opposition to traditional and fundamentalist marriages.
Reply #23 from JoeUser Forums Top
How about Ellen and Eve?

IG


Better yet, Adam, Steve, Ellen, Eve, and the serpent - all snorting coke, having sex, and voting democrat in the Hollywood Hawaiian Hotel.
Reply #24 from JoeUser Forums Top
i musta missed that place. whats the address?
Reply #25 from JoeUser Forums Top
MAN...........THIS ARTICLE UPSETTED PEOPLE MORE THAN I THOUGHT IT WOULD!!!