"If I'm invited to be the president of a theological school, that'll be a perfectly appropriate question," he says, "but to be the president of the United States, I don't know that that's going to be the most important issue that I'll be facing when I'm sworn in." |
What a slimy answer.
"I don't know that that's going to be the most important issue that I'll be facing"
So if an issue isn't
the most important it can't be discussed? Wouldn't that mean he can talk about only
one thing? Does that mean he thinks being "a Christian leader" (whatever he means by that)
is the most important thing?
"when I'm sworn in."
Did y'all catch the presumptive case there? Keep dreamin', Mike.
"that'll be a perfectly appropriate question"
Something about this whole "appropriate question" dodge makes me
very queasy. How many questions do you think he'd answer if he became president? I'm thinking 98% of them would be dismissed as "inappropriate." He has a record of waving off concerns with the flag of his own rightness. Haven't we had enough of that garbage the past 7 years?
But since Clinton got the presidency, character isn't supposed to matter in politics anymore. And that's why there are a bunch of liars in office. |
Because, you know, there were no liars in office prior to Clinton.
saying, basically, that he has character |
I find that people who
are a thing don't have to go around
telling people they are. Did Romney have to tell everyone he was Mormon?
Besides, it's a short sighted move. It may get him some play in a primary/caucus or two, but on the wider stage it will come back to haunt him.
This guy isn't the brightest bulb on the tree.