COL Gene COL Gene

NIE Report Says Iran Stopped Nuclear Program in 2003!

NIE Report Says Iran Stopped Nuclear Program in 2003!




Bush has been telling the world we must stop Iran from going nuclear and our intelligence agencies say they ended their nuclear program in 2003. Last month Bush was warning about the grave danger from Iran and talking about WW III. The conclusions of our intelligence agencies and the Bush rhetoric are not in agreement. What does Bush say about the latest Intelligence that has been made public? He says it shows we are in danger from Iran.

There is something very wrong with Bush. No matter what the intelligence or facts are make no difference to Bush. He comes out with the same line. It is time Congress make it clear to Bush he can not attack Iran without a declaration of war against Iran by Congress! This man is dangerous!
33,028 views 113 replies
Reply #101 Top
95% of what it takes to make a nuke weapon can be researched under civilian use.


The actual production is the problem. The trigger is another very complex issue. The NIE evaluation is cause for the continued monitoring if Iran by the IAEA but it ends ANY current consideration of a strike or other covert action! It will also prevent any more UN sanctions from being approved at this time.

Bush and Cheney are like the boy who cried Wolf too often. They have no credibility in this country or thought the world. That is dangerous should a REAL danger develop in the future. I doubt many will take any warning from Bush or Cheney seriously until it was too late.
Reply #102 Top
The actual production is the problem. The trigger is another very complex issue. The NIE evaluation is cause for the continued monitoring if Iran by the IAEA but it ends ANY current consideration of a strike or other covert action! It will also prevent any more UN sanctions from being approved at this time.
End of quote




that is not what the expert on fox said yesterday. he said the process for civilian use would take a lot of research. but to make a weapon from that it would take no time at all.


now who should i believe a man who knows what he is talking about. or a man who doesn't know the difference between a m-16 or a m-60
Reply #103 Top
Reply By: danielostPosted: Monday, December 10, 2007
The actual production is the problem. The trigger is another very complex issue. The NIE evaluation is cause for the continued monitoring if Iran by the IAEA but it ends ANY current consideration of a strike or other covert action! It will also prevent any more UN sanctions from being approved at this time.
that is not what the expert on fox said yesterday. he said the process for civilian use would take a lot of research. but to make a weapon from that it would take no time at all.now who should i believe a man who knows what he is talking about. or a man who doesn't know the difference between a m-16 or a m-60


Believe who you want. The fact remains it would take years of concentrated action to produce a weapon and then delivery is another issue. The far simper way for any country to acquire a nuclear weapon is to purchase it from the tens of thousands that were part of the old Soviet Union!
Reply #104 Top
This is the same government that wanted to put to DEATH the man who converted from Islam to Christianity. This is the country that produces over 90% of the WORLDS Opium. This is the country where Al-Qaeda is operating at the same levels as on 9/11.
End of quote


So you want us to go and take over their country and start nation building?  Isn't that the thing you keep screaming about otherwise?  I have never seen such propaganda before.





Reply #105 Top
The fact remains it would take years of concentrated action to produce a weapon and then delivery is another issue.
End of quote


which is why i stated at the beginning Iran stopped working on the weapon to concentrate on a rocket to carry said weapon.

they are also carring out the civilian use of the nuke power. which is 95% of the work for a weapon.
Reply #106 Top
Would be good for you to read today's WSJ & Washington Post, Gene. There's some of that "first-hand" "eyewitness" "insider" stuff that you seem to accept on its face as gospel, but it disagrees substantially with the NIE's conclusions.

Seems we have conflicting "I was there" reports - that's gonna have to cause a seizure in that pea-brain of yours.
Reply #107 Top
Reply By: Island DogPosted: Tuesday, December 11, 2007
This is the same government that wanted to put to DEATH the man who converted from Islam to Christianity. This is the country that produces over 90% of the WORLDS Opium. This is the country where Al-Qaeda is operating at the same levels as on 9/11.
So you want us to go and take over their country and start nation building? Isn't that the thing you keep screaming about otherwise? I have never seen such propaganda before.


What I and MOST Americans want is for Bush to destroy those responsible for 9/11, the attack on the Cole, The Marine barracks and the first attack on the trade towers! They are in Afghanistan and the border region of Pakistan. If any of these groups are operating in Iraq, it is because we invaded Iraq and allowed them to set up operations. I favor destroying the terrorist factions in Iraq as well. That is very different from Nation Building like Bush is trying in Iraq!
Reply #108 Top

The NEW intelligence says that Iran suspended their nuclear weapons program.
End of quote


I thought they didn't have one?
Reply #109 Top
Reply By: LeaukiPosted: Wednesday, December 12, 2007
The NEW intelligence says that Iran suspended their nuclear weapons program.
I thought they didn't have one?


What difference does it make-- If they do not have one they are NOT the danger Bush is warning about!
Reply #110 Top
Afraid of reading, Gene?
Reply #111 Top

What difference does it make--
End of quote


To you? Probably none. To me? A lot, since I regularly visit Haifa University.


If they do not have one they are NOT the danger Bush is warning about!
End of quote


Having been a student in the university of Haifa while Hizbullah was sending rockets into it (a university is a prime target for these people, it's filled with young Jews), I can tell you that they ARE the danger Bush is warning about.

It's true that they are not a danger to you. Not yet.

You can watch them take out the Jews in Israel first, and don't have to care, because you are not an Israeli Jew.

You can watch them take out the Christians in Lebanon, and don't have to care, since you are not a Maronite.

It will never spread to the US, right?

But what if it does? Who will care? Who else will be left?

No, "Colonel", if this report is true (and you seem to think it is), it means that Iran HAD such a programme and that means they ARE a danger.

So please be honest enough to point out that you think Bush is wrong because Iran is not a danger TO YOU. Don't pretend it's an objective fact that they are no danger at all just because you are not on top of their list of enemies.

Reply #112 Top
You can watch them take out the Jews in Israel first, and don't have to care, because you are not an Israeli Jew.

You can watch them take out the Christians in Lebanon, and don't have to care, since you are not a Maronite.

It will never spread to the US, right?
End of quote




all they have to do to hit the us is put one of their current rockets on an oil tanker. i do believe that they have a few of these and sail into range of the us. so yes iran is a direct threat to the usa. dispite what good old gene has tried to convince us.
Reply #113 Top
and if this idiot can think of that. i would think that those brilliant people in Iran can.