NIE Report Says Iran Stopped Nuclear Program in 2003!

from JoeUser Forums



Bush has been telling the world we must stop Iran from going nuclear and our intelligence agencies say they ended their nuclear program in 2003. Last month Bush was warning about the grave danger from Iran and talking about WW III. The conclusions of our intelligence agencies and the Bush rhetoric are not in agreement. What does Bush say about the latest Intelligence that has been made public? He says it shows we are in danger from Iran.

There is something very wrong with Bush. No matter what the intelligence or facts are make no difference to Bush. He comes out with the same line. It is time Congress make it clear to Bush he can not attack Iran without a declaration of war against Iran by Congress! This man is dangerous!
politics
33,026 views 113 replies
Reply #1 from JoeUser Forums Top
these are the same people who have been saying for the last 4 years that iran would/could have a nuke weapon in 5 years. so don't go blaming this on bush
Reply #2 from JoeUser Forums Top
1. They continue to enrich uranium.

2. What President would simply let Iran off the hook by saying OK, you guys are no problem? He, wisely, is keeping the diplomatic pressure on. We have no indication that "diplomatic pressure" alone is what prompted them to stop active weapons development, only speculation. Whatever the reason, now is the time to keep the lid on them and any President who didn't would be derelict in his duty.

3. This is just another example of your ignorance of international diplomacy.
Object Desktop - Get all of our enhancement utilities in one suite
Reply #3 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: danielostPosted: Tuesday, December 04, 2007these are the same people who have been saying for the last 4 years that iran would/could have a nuke weapon in 5 years. so don't go blaming this on bush


The NEW intelligence says that Iran suspended their nuclear weapons program. Bush is claiming that does not change anything. THAT MAKES NO SENSE! It makes all the difference in the world! Bush is IGNORING the new Intelligence and continuing his policy on incorrect t information. If the President is not going to use the intelligence then why spend $12 Billion per year to develop that intelligence?

Reply | | DeleteReply By: DaiwaPosted: Tuesday, December 04, 20071. They continue to enrich uranium.


That does not mean it is useable for a nuclear weapon. That same process develops fuel for reactors. The issue is that Bush is IGNORING the new Intelligence!
Reply #4 from JoeUser Forums Top
That does not mean it is useable for a nuclear weapon. That same process develops fuel for reactors. The issue is that Bush is IGNORING the new Intelligence!
End of quote


no it means your an idiot.


the reason they stopped making nuke weapon is that they needed a rocket to use it with. they are still building that. you have really got to start looking at more than the liberal crap page.
Reply #5 from JoeUser Forums Top
this thread also reminds me of when Clinton went to china and came back stating that he had gotten the Chinese to stop pointing their three nuke missiles at us. the only problem it only takes a minute to re aim one of those things. so what did Clinton do nothing.
Reply #6 from JoeUser Forums Top
The NEW intelligence says that Iran suspended their nuclear weapons program.
End of quote


False, The new intelligence says that Iran slowed their nuclear weapon program.

And it's not "new intelligence", it's "new intelligence analysis".


However, I find Bush's attitude toward this whole business pretty... Hawkish. I know it's redundant, but he seems determined to head America toward another war, no matter what info he gets.
Reply #7 from JoeUser Forums Top
he seems determined to head America toward another war, no matter what info he gets.
I think what Bush is aiming at is for Israel to do his dirty work. Israel thinks like some of the paranoidal hawks who have commented above.
Reply #8 from JoeUser Forums Top
I think what Bush is aiming at is for Israel to do his dirty work. Israel thinks like some of the paranoidal hawks who have commented above.
End of quote


the reason they stopped making nuke weapon is that they needed a rocket to use it with. they are still building that. you have really got to start looking at more than the liberal crap page.
End of quote




a weapon doesn't do you any good if you can't get it to the target.
Reply #9 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: danielostPosted: Tuesday, December 04, 2007
That does not mean it is useable for a nuclear weapon. That same process develops fuel for reactors. The issue is that Bush is IGNORING the new Intelligence!
no it means your an idiot.the reason they stopped making nuke weapon is that they needed a rocket to use it with. they are still building that. you have really got to start looking at more than the liberal crap page.


Iran processing Uranium for a reactor does not endanger anyone. The claim by Bush was they were building nuclear weapons which the NIE said ended in 2003. Bush was told there was a major change in the intelligence in August and he continued to tell us about Iran trying to build nuclear weapons. Even now he insists nothing has changed. That is a LIE and no one will believe Bush. This is the very same thing he did with the intelligence that showed that Iraq did not have WMD. He only accepted Intel that supported what he wanted to do and we all know that he was WRONG. IT is time to STOP Bush from ignoring the facts and moving closer to another unjustified war. Senator Biden is correct- If Bush moves against Iran unless they attacked us, Bush should immediately be impeached and removed from power. Bush is Dangerous!
Reply #10 from JoeUser Forums Top
No threat? As soon as they quit killing Iraqis and U.S. Troops in Iraq we'll talk about "no threat".

When will you quit kissing the butts of everyone willing to kill U.S. troops? Your love for our enemies disgusts me. Go live in Iran, where you belong. Maybe they'll let you torture a few US troops. You'd just love that!
Reply #11 from JoeUser Forums Top
Well, we know what ColGene will be doing when Bush leaves office now.

Have you gotten a burqa for your wife for after you move to your new job as Ahmidinejab's press secretary?
Reply #12 from JoeUser Forums Top
if i was president that reacter would already be dust
Reply #13 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: ParaTed2kPosted: Wednesday, December 05, 2007No threat? As soon as they quit killing Iraqis and U.S. Troops in Iraq we'll talk about "no threat".When will you quit kissing the butts of everyone willing to kill U.S. troops? Your love for our enemies disgusts me. Go live in Iran, where you belong. Maybe they'll let you torture a few US troops. You'd just love that!




Bush has been warning about we can not accept a nuclear IRAN. The NIE says that is not an issue. If we were NOT in Iraq, neither the Iraqis nor Iranians would be attacking our troops! The reason for American deaths and injuries is because of Bush! If Iraq or Iran had invaded the U.S. what do you think we would be doing to the invaders?
Reply #14 from JoeUser Forums Top
The NIE says that is not an issue.
End of quote


again this is the same group that has been saying that iran would have a nuke weapon in 5 to 10 years. over the last 4 years.
Reply #15 from JoeUser Forums Top
If Iraq or Iran had invaded the U.S. what do you think we would be doing to the invaders?
End of quote


You would be joining them.
Reply #16 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: danielostPosted: Wednesday, December 05, 2007
The NIE says that is not an issue.
again this is the same group that has been saying that iran would have a nuke weapon in 5 to 10 years. over the last 4 years.


It is the Intelligence we have and I would accept their datra before Bush who oinly fools believe! If the NIE had said Iran was about to heve a nuclear weapon Bush would be shouting it from the ROOF TOPS!


Reply By: ParaTed2kPosted: Wednesday, December 05, 2007
If Iraq or Iran had invaded the U.S. what do you think we would be doing to the invaders?
You would be joining them.



Dam Straight-- I would ATTCK anyone that invaded the U.S.!!!!!!!!! In Iraq WE ARE THE INVADERS!
Reply #17 from JoeUser Forums Top
No, Gene, I said YOU would be joining those who attacked the US. Your bigoted hatred for America is clear with every poisoned word you type. The thought of torturing and murdering Americans (especially our troops) is porn to your twisted, sickening brain.
Reply #18 from JoeUser Forums Top
Yes, Iran is just another innocent victim of the U.S. and they are not a threat at all.


Bush Derangement Syndrome: the acute onset of paranoia in otherwise normal people in reaction to the policies, the presidency -- nay -- the very existence of George W. Bush.
Reply #19 from JoeUser Forums Top
Idiot Gene... Could it be that Iran had to stop their nuclear program because the money being used was diverted to fighting the US and a free Iraq?

Of course not, your heroes who have declared war against the US would never do that, would they?
Reply #20 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: ParaTed2kPosted: Wednesday, December 05, 2007No, Gene, I said YOU would be joining those who attacked the US.


YOU ARE A STUPID ASS!!!!!!!
Reply #21 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: Island DogPosted: Wednesday, December 05, 2007Yes, Iran is just another innocent victim of the U.S. and they are not a threat at all. Bush Derangement Syndrome: the acute onset of paranoia in otherwise normal people in reaction to the policies, the presidency -- nay -- the very existence of George W. Bush.


YES Bush is a Plague of this country
Reply #22 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: ParaTed2kPosted: Wednesday, December 05, 2007Idiot Gene... Could it be that Iran had to stop their nuclear program because the money being used was diverted to fighting the US and a free Iraq?Of course not, your heroes who have declared war against the US would never do that, would they?


The issue is they STOPPED! If we had not invaded Iraq neither the Iraqis or Iranians would be attacking us in Iraq! Bush should have sent our troops aginst those responsible for 9/11 and that is NOT IRAQ
Reply #23 from JoeUser Forums Top

Synch, not "sink" Gene. In an article this short you should probably get all the words spelled correctly.

 

As far as the need for Congressional authorization for any war. I am in agreement, I think most people are.

Reply #24 from JoeUser Forums Top
As far as the need for Congressional authorization for any war. I am in agreement, I think most people are.


Bush is the one that NEEDS to understand that! Today he said Iran needs to explain their weapons program that ended in 2003. WHY! If they are not moving toward completing such weapons the danger Bush has been pushing DOES NOT EXIST!
Reply #25 from JoeUser Forums Top
Bush should have sent our troops aginst those responsible for 9/11 and that is NOT IRAQ
End of quote


The people who were behind Sept. 11 have mostly been killed or captured.


If they are not moving toward completing such weapons the danger Bush has been pushing DOES NOT EXIST!
End of quote


I don't this "report" is any reason to start believing Iran is not a threat. But then again what do you care, it's just something else for you to complain about.