COL Gene COL Gene

Most Important Bush Domestic Policies Have FAILED

▼

Most Important Bush Domestic Policies Have FAILED

from JoeUser Forums



Two of the most important domestic initiatives of the Bush Presidency are the Economy and Education. We continue to hear how great a job the Bush policies have done in these two areas. This week we have definitive data on the results of the past 6 years on how well the economy has impacted most Americans and how well the Public Education system is performing (No Child Left Behind).

First the Census Bureau has just released the data on the Economy and health Care in America. Here are the results from the past 6 years:

Average Annual wage after Inflation is down for both men and women workers.

Median Family Income after Inflation is below the level at the start of 2000.

Number of people without health coverage jumped from 44.8 Million in 2005 to 47 Million in 2006.

One out of every nine children has no health care and Bush threatens to VETO a bill to add health coverage to another 3.3 Million Children.


SAT scores in Math and Reading are down for the 8th year in a row.

NO MORE BS about how the Bush Policies have impacted the Economy, Health Care and Education. The results are in and Bush gets an “F”. The sources are The Educational Testing Service for the SAT scores and for the economic and health care results we have the U.S. Census Bureau!
politics
26,348 views 95 replies
Reply #76 from JoeUser Forums Top

Reply By: danielost Posted: Sunday, September 02, 2007
lets see 8% unemployment is better than 4% unemployment.


Unemployment during Clinton was as low as 3.7%. The Census data deals with HOW much working Americans have to SPEND. They have LESS to spend in 2006 then in 2000 after inflation. How does that make the AVERAGE family better today?
Reply #77 from JoeUser Forums Top
Notice how gene blames everyones situation on Bush, and completely ignores Americans personal financial responsiblity.  What else do you expect from someone who expects the government to take care of every part of your life?


They have LESS to spend in 2006 then in 2000 after inflation. How does that make the AVERAGE family better today?


Go to your local Target or Wal-mart and tell that to all the people there buying useless junk. 




Star Control: Origins
Reply #78 from JoeUser Forums Top
Go to your local Target or Wal-mart and tell that to all the people there buying useless junk.


i was in a walmart yesterday


i almost thought it was the christmas season.
Reply #79 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: Island Dog Posted: Sunday, September 02, 2007
“Notice how gene blames everyone’s situation on Bush, and completely ignores Americans personal financial responsibility. What else do you expect from someone who expects the government to take care of every part of your life?



They have LESS to spend in 2006 then in 2000 after inflation. How does that make the AVERAGE family better today?


Go to your local Target or Wal-mart and tell that to all the people there buying useless junk.”



That is not the issue. The Census data shows that people in 2006 have LESS to spend on the average then in 2000 despite the great Bush economic BOOM! Bush Ignored this fact and only Cherry Picked the fact that Median Family Income was higher then in 2005. It is still less then in 2000.
Reply #80 from JoeUser Forums Top
That is not the issue. The Census data shows that people in 2006 have LESS to spend on the average then in 2000 despite the great Bush economic BOOM!




people today are spending more money than in 2000 but that isn't the issue.
Reply #81 from JoeUser Forums Top
The ISSUE is The Average Family, after inflation, is worse off then in 2000. Thus the GREAT BUSH economic BOOM has not helped the Average Family- Just the wealthy!
Reply #82 from JoeUser Forums Top
The ISSUE is The Average Family, after inflation, is worse off then in 2000. Thus the GREAT BUSH economic BOOM has not helped the Average Family- Just the wealthy!


i was in a walmart yesterday


i almost thought it was the christmas season.


Reply #83 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: danielost Posted: Sunday, September 02, 2007
The ISSUE is The Average Family, after inflation, is worse off then in 2000. Thus the GREAT BUSH economic BOOM has not helped the Average Family- Just the wealthy!



i was in a walmart yesterday


i almost thought it was the christmas season.


That does NOT change the Census data that shows the Average Family is worse off today then in 2000!
Reply #84 from JoeUser Forums Top
the Census data


this report could be a lie.
Reply #85 from JoeUser Forums Top
Taxing Situations; Taxiing Situations

The average tax refund in 2003 was $2,154, up from $1,802 in 2000. Average taxes due at the time of filing were $3,499 in 2003, down from $4,406 in 2000. (Table 473)

The greater Cincinnati airport led major U.S. airports in on-time arrivals in the last three months of 2005 with an 84.3 percent on-time rate. Salt Lake City International had the best on-time departure rate at 86.3 percent. (Table 1055


RELEASED: FRIDAY, DECEMBER 15, 2006
WWW Link

sorry i cannot find this report. i have found reports on the report but not the report.


and i don't like getting info third or in this case fourth party. specially when the other party has an agenda like you do.
Reply #86 from JoeUser Forums Top
danielostSeptember 2, 2007 19:01:19Reply #84
the Census data


this report could be a lie.

What an IDIOT you are!
Reply #87 from JoeUser Forums Top
sorry i cannot find this report. i have found reports on the report but not the report.


and i don't like getting info third or in this case fourth party. specially when the other party has an agenda like you do.
Reply #88 from JoeUser Forums Top
What an IDIOT you are!


Great debating skills there gene.


Reply #89 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: danielost Posted: Sunday, September 02, 2007
sorry i cannot find this report. i have found reports on the report but not the report.

For one it was the LEAD story ( Top Front Page) of the Philadelphia Inquirer on 29 August 2007!
Reply #90 from JoeUser Forums Top

More Than 1,800 Iraqis Killed in August
ROBERT H. REID (AP)
Civilian deaths rose in August to their second-highest monthly level this year, according to figures compiled Saturday by The Associated Press. That raises questions about whether U.S. strategy is working days before Congress receives landmark reports that will decide the course of the war.
September 01, 2007



http://www.philly.com/philly/search/?search=y&searchKeywords=august+29+2007&page=2&sortBy=score

ok i read your story no mention of it being up 20% and august was the second highest monthly death rate.
Reply #91 from JoeUser Forums Top
Sorry Wrong Reference.

It appeared on Page A2 on Sept 2, 2007 in the Philadelphia Inquirer. The story was written by James Glanz of the NYT.
Reply #92 from JoeUser Forums Top
James Glanz of the NYT.


as i said why should i trust some reporter with an agenda.
Reply #93 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: danielost Posted: Monday, September 03, 2007
James Glanz of the NYT.


as i said why should i trust some reporter with an agenda.

If you are saying this story in not true because it was carried in the NYT you are truly NUTS!
Reply #94 from JoeUser Forums Top
If you are saying this story in not true because it was carried in the NYT you are truly NUTS!


It's actually a valid point considering how we have documented the liberal press publishing stories that were simply not true, and purely enemy propaganda.


Reply #95 from JoeUser Forums Top




Reply By: Island Dog Posted: Monday, September 03, 2007
If you are saying this story in not true because it was carried in the NYT you are truly NUTS!


It's actually a valid point considering how we have documented the liberal press publishing stories that were simply not true, and purely enemy propaganda.

We have also seen the press uncover stories that Bush and his minions would have kept secret if the could have done that.