Dan Greene

Michael Vick Down for the Count?

Michael Vick Down for the Count?

I think he's done in the NFL

VIDEO FROM CNN
"http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/law/08/20/vick/index.html#cnnSTCVideo"

I love how this video categorizes the story as "Vick" the victim, of the justice system, because there was a group of other defendants who took plea deals, in order to testify against him, and get lesser sentences. Of course you would expect that people with integrity, don't testify against others, i.e. bear false witness, and so I'm left to conclude that Michael Vick is indeed guilty of the crime as he has pled guilty too. That means for certain some jail time, and probably a suspension from the NFL. Personally I was defending "Vick" to my co-workers when this story broke, they wanted him out and out for good at the time, and now that he has pled guilty I tend to agree. I think if Vick serves his time, and explains what really happened, which he hasn't really done thus far, that may change.

I think because he has not been truthful to the organization they shouldn't feel the need to come out and try to help this guy. The team, I'm sure, want to move on, the NFL, clearly wants no part of this, and neither does America.

What he stands accused of is, drowning and hanging dogs that "didn't perform well". I'll make a short but painful connection on that point. These dogs got "cut" and people outside the NFL or professional sports might not fully understand the gravity of the meaning of competition for these guys. Obviously Vick is highly competitive, like many other professional players, a lot of that mystic we give these professionals, the kiss ass in the media, the coach/GM praise for good performance on the field, the huge salaries, unfortunately in this case it spilled over into other areas of his life in a very negative way. In an inexcusable way at that.

Michael Vick is a victim but not of the justice system, he's a victim of star power, and not knowing when it's acceptable to lose. If that be the only redeemable reason to bring him back onto an NFL football field in the future so be it. I happen to think that he needs to make sure he gets perspective in his life first.

If you need a happier story, right on the right side of the screen are two cool stories, one of a (Rottweiler nursing a kitty so cute) and another of a guy who dug his dog out of a drainage ditch. He was really happy to rescue his dog. That's the kinda perspective I think people need to take to heart.

"I got my dog! I got my dog" :) Fucking heartwarming :)
21,449 views 129 replies
Reply #126 Top
You have a Mary Kate article? Do you have a Avon one too?


Actually, Dan, go to my blog and read the article before pissing yourself laughing at me. It had a point to be made, one you might actually agree with.

Go ahead. It's from three years ago, but it's still listed as my number two article. Until you've READ it, you don't have valid reason to criticize.
Reply #127 Top
"Go ahead. It's from three years ago, but it's still listed as my number two article. Until you've READ it, you don't have valid reason to criticize."

Yeah maybe I'll get around to it,

"Maybe the racist by nature comment was slightly hyperbolic,"

I'm the one back peddling? I'll give you credit for acknowledgment of it's outrageousness and embellishment in describing the bulk of a state, or it's local communities.

The fact that these racial intolerance escapades, which often originate through people from foreign communities coming into another place to "raise awareness" of their cause, have been canceled and not accepted by the majority of Wisconsinites means this community does not deserve that labeling.

"And I don't know if you've ever been in a supervisory position, but you've got to make a pretty good paper trail to dismiss someone for racist remarks."

I have been, on a few different occasions, my most challenging assignments as a supervisor were supervising 45-50 year old adults working fast food, who would break out in fist fights in the back of the restaurant over who was going to do what, and dealing with "the bosses nephew" who had an anger management, pot addiction , and was chronicle unable to control his temper, again in the back of the restaurant. This guy, about my age, maybe a year or two older, would throw a temper tantrum to put a spoiled four year old to shame, screaming about how people shouldn't be ordering such large orders of food, LOL (Working in a restauraunt, he was complaining daily/nightly about people ordering too much.)

Maybe I wasn't the most effective shift supervisor but the manager refused to fire any of these people so my hands were tied and my role was damage control. I am so happy to be free of that.

Needless to say, I understand that you have to document lots of behaviors, and as a manager there are compromises made in which are addressed. As I stated, I have been largely free from working with racially intolerant people, while working with a diverse crowd. Yes the state of Wisconsin as a whole, is 90% white when counted on a census, which doesn't count lots of people. I will still argue that I worked with a diverse crowd and that today I still do although not in a restaurant thankfully. Just because a majority are white doesn't mean that minorities aren't included or represented.

From my perspective, I have found that comments about race or perceived racially intolerant people, though rarely encountered, either don't express it, or don't last long at the type of jobs I've been employed at, because of the behavior or other behaviors that are common in ignorant people. When I was a supervisor I did not have to deal with a single race issue, though I served customers from all different backgrounds and worked with as I said, a diverse crowd.

"OK, you are saying I'm full of shit for saying incidents aren't reported out of fear? Well, then, apparently, according to you, a lot of rapes and molestations don't happen because they're not reported out of FEAR."

Maybe you are telling the whole truth and nothing but it. It is you who say I am calling you a liar. I implied that you didn't provide anything to support your statements, except what basically amounts to opinion.

Of course rapes and molestations occur and go unreported as well as racism. The incident you describe could very well have happened, and been racism, and been nothing but. However, you say

"...this individual had not only harassed this woman at work, he also managed to find her at home. While there was no evidence that I'm aware of that this man was a member of a larger hate group (IF the individual we suspected was, in fact, guilty)..."

You don't have any evidence that the person was guilty. So it could have been anything else. Likely what you said, but possibly something else. Now, ask me to convict the state of Wisconsin and my community, Appleton, as "racist by nature" based on your perception which is not backed up by

A. Solid Evidence or even any evidence except the way it looked, i.e perception.
B. A criminal investigation

I'm sorry, but Gid you get way out of line when you make sweeping statements like that, encompassing the entire state and community, for what apparently are the actions of two people who didn't like each other, and harassment. Racism or not.

The story about the Hmong shooter, the cultural difference, the lack of understanding about property laws, by the Hmong man, probably lack of English speaking skill, led to the misunderstanding, and the tragedy oh him feeling threatened by the land owners and gunning them down. Racially motivated or not, the owners had the right to be on the property and protect themselves against trespassers., the fact that there is a cultural difference between the Hmong and white Wisconsinites is only a triviality. His defense team claimed that they shouted racial insults and perhaps they did, He killed six of them, shot the woman twice, hardly self-defense, and hardly like it matters. It was no revenge, he freaked because there were six of them and they wanted him off their land.

http://www.courttv.com/trials/vang/091305_ctv.html
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,139239,00.html
One of the reasons I don't go hunting, lots of people, some crazy, with guns in the woods, no thanks.

If they did racially slur him, maybe it would be fair to say, that the Hmong community needs to do a better job of conforming to local laws. Nobody wants to live in a society where we accept being judged by our race but if there is a direct correlation, which in this case, Hmong hunters, on this property without permission. I have a hard time believing that the Hmong hunter got the details exactly right,

I do believe that you, in the 90's and maybe even more recently had or observed conversations at the water cooler or whatever about race, with people expressing their views, in a racist way. Do your coworkers represent the state, maybe, but maybe not. I do know that the community I live in, actively works to prevent the type of behaviors, crimes, and racial motivated hate that you describe experiencing in Oshkosh.

"It's pathetic. They let all these foreigners in here, and they walk all over everybody's property," said Jim Arneberg, owner of the Haugen Inn in nearby Haugen."

From the Fox news article, here is an example of what you are talking about right? The kind of racist dogma that people just take cheap shots about and really should be ashamed of themselves for.

I don't think Oshkosh is either particularly representative or not dis-representative of Wisconsin. Each area is different, cities like Milwaukee obviously have more and different racial issues to work with because of the population and proportion of minorities of those communities.

In places like Appleton where the community reaches out quite actively it may or may not be different. The fact that I have rarely been to Oshkosh and never lived there might mean something different also.

By the way Gid. There has been another "incident" read this, and see how the Wisconsin community reacts and the way the story is written about the race angle. Again, white hunter, Hmong hunter, shooting and stabbing.

http://72.14.253.104/search?q=cache:wwqd4Kh_pkkJ:www.todaystmj4.com/news/local/5832776.html+Hmong+hunter+shooting&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=9&gl=us

A whole bunch more on the shooting

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1289180/posts

Oh by the way. That Hmong hunter who killed the 6 in Wisconsin, he killed another hunter a few years before. So he was a murderer before he was the victim of the racism, perhaps he brought it upon himself and wanted a confrontation with the hunting party.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1287569/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1289045/posts#confirmation

Interesting twist. It seems there are always circumstances behind the scenes.
Reply #128 Top
Oh by the way. That Hmong hunter who killed the 6 in Wisconsin, he killed another hunter a few years before. So he was a murderer before he was the victim of the racism, perhaps he brought it upon himself and wanted a confrontation with the hunting party.


I'm not referring to the incident from 2004. I referred to it only in passing, stating that comments indicated that racial comments may have escalated the situation. I was referring to the more recent incident which you cited where the Hmong was the victim. In the Vang case, REGARDLESS of whether racial comments escalated the situation, Vang is paying the penalty he deserves for his actions.

I would like to point you to a comment in the article you listed (the TMJ4 article) where the reporter states "The slaying has rekindled racial tension in northern Wisconsin,". Apparently the reporter thinks racial tension exists in northern Wisconsin, or the comment would not have been made.
Reply #129 Top
"When you cite what you see on Maury as if that's a reliable source"

But you see dear, I did not cite it at all, nor did I give it reliability, I just gave it as an example. Citation requires a link to something with further depth on the subject.

"An example of providing citation would be this... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maury_Povich"

I don't think Maury is any more credible a source than Anna Nicole Smith. It is you who chose to assume I was providing "evidentiary" or "supporting" fact, when in fact I was making an example. I did see segments of his show with some little kids in the KKK ghost costume bologna and I was disgusted but that doesn't make whats on his show factual.

"Maury and others have worked their media magic on you"

Yup, that's obvious, so says you.

"the assumption that no adults seek to join the Klan."

Joining the Klan is a dangerous activity, the only goal of the KKK is to rid the world of any race except whites. Encouraging that by any means. Smoking is also a dangerous activity and adults in their 30's and 40's don't start because they see the others around them who can't quit. The Klan is not addictive like cigarettes are however the marketing and indoctrination of children and young adults works on youth as that is the most impressionable age to be.

Forgive me if I gave you the idea that nobody in adulthood joins the clan or starts smoking, you may be right, but the overwhelming majority start in their youth through indoctrination or looking for alternative to mainstream lifestyles.

"The Klan isn't welcomed ANYWHERE anymore," They frequently march all over the nation, Minnesota for example had a rally not too long ago, and if you look dig deep online, you can see a bit of a resurgence since 9/11/01 on that.

"Most likely it was cancelled for one of two reasons, neither having anything to do with the welcome they were likely to recieve."

I cited an article delving into the detail. Again, if you want to participate here Whip, you need to pay attention.

"I realize that this thread has wandered far off topic"

Thanks for helping to put it back on track. want you to know that the Klan does 'live next door' and many of them *are* intelligent, articulate, dangerous...and underground. The fact that you don't see them out there making fools of themselves is no reason to relax and pronounce racism defeated, in your neighborhood, town, state, or nation.

I guess the same could be said for National Socialism, or Communism in the United States, you begin to sound like Col Gene, or Paladin, Whip.

"Why is your town so white, Dan?"

Minorities have historically chosen to cluster in the mainland United States, and, Wisconsin. The fact is we are only a few generations removed from a history of first enslavement, then segregation and pseudo-laws protecting people from discrimination, and then later and finally a civil rights showdown in the 1960's which brought to the forefront the issue of race. 1963-65-68 were historic and culture shaping years and the expectation in the 70's 80's and 90's since then has been that equal rights will be upheld, with that in mind, people are moving to different parts of the country.

Why don't you ask me why Wisconsin doesn't have an Eskimo population? It is because demographics, in the absence of war do not change rapidly. The United States has a low birthrate for countries worldwide.

Wisconsin isn't far out of line when you look at neighboring states,

Minnesota 85% white
Illinois 80% white
Iowa 96% white
Indiana 90% white
Michigan 83% white

As for Appleton, I'm still looking for the particular demographics that are updated.