CharlesCS CharlesCS

We no longer have Illegal Immigrants in the US.

We no longer have Illegal Immigrants in the US.

At least not according to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid

Well, this is the first time I have seen where there was a bill in the Gov’t that did not pass yet the end result was somehow still achieved. Harry Reid, Senate Majority Leader, made a comment on the news where he called the illegal immigrants “undocumented Americans”. Wow, now they are Americans? Undocumented? How does that work? How can you be a citizen (cause being called an American on American soil means you are a citizen right?) of the US, within the US borders and be undocumented? Is that like losing your license, birth certificate and social security card all at the same time? Oh, so many questions and not enough answers. Someone please explain to me how is this possible. Cause I am just at a lost.
25,989 views 84 replies
Reply #26 Top
Hrm, well then you'll have to explain to me what the heck it means. Ask the Emperor of Ice Cream if there aren't standards involved with getting the title as an immigrant. Yet, we call child molesters sitting in prison Americans.

To me it is one or the other. If we are going to be protectionist and bubble with pride over the word "American", then we damn well ought to apply some standards to people that are born here too. We should have to earn it as much as anyone else.

Otherwise, it seems piddly to let anyone whose baby-momma squeezed them out here have it, and then pretend we have to hold other people to some huge standard. You can say that working 12 hours a day doesn't mean a thing, but if you didn't live in a nation where people did, "American" would mean even less than it does now.
Reply #27 Top
I didn't say you couldn't call yourself that, I simply said that you really didn't do anything to earn the title.[/quote]

I'm sorry Baker but I don't get your point here. I am American not because I call myself one, I am because I am. I was born and raised here. I am American, I earned it because I was born here. There is no national law stating that one has to earn the right to be call a citizen of your own country. Where do you come up with this stuff. You are condemming every child born in this country to a nobody simply because they have not somehow earn the right to call themselves Americans? I'm starting to think you have lost your mind. This makes no sense.

Some people seem to think it is some label of quality or idealism that we can't allow to be watered down.


Some people? I hope you are including yourself since you were the one that said "I simply said that you really didn't do anything to earn the title." and "with this constant need to defend a title that 99.9% of people don't really do anything to achieve.". You may not think that calling yourself American is not some kind of powerful title, that does not mean other see it that way. I am proud to be know as an AZmerican, I wear my citizenship with pride, I feel empowered by it, the name is respected by some and feared by others, it's a link to a nation that is know for it's excessive amount of freedom that so many others around the world are willing to risk their very lives to reach and taste. I would never change my country for any other and to be known as an American is not only important to me but it's also a chance that a better lifestyle is possible. The US may not be Utopia, but as far as I'm concerned it comes pretty close, it just needs some tweaking here and there. So no, I will not allow anyone to water down this name. Not even Bush.

In reality, prisons are full of "Americans", and someone who has worked here for ten years and contributed to their community is deemed unworthy of the title.

If I had to choose between the illegal working 12 hour days nailing shingles, and the guy sitting in jail for molesting kids, I'd rather associate the former with the label "American" than the latter. If we are going to start being picky about who uses our "brand", then we really ought to look at how much of a slipshod manner we use to hand it out, and the standards we have to keep it.

If we are going to allow people who are born here to rape, murder, steal, etc., all their lives, and then call them Americans, well, how much does the name really mean? If you guys are concerned with the devaluing of the moniker, maybe there are bigger issues to address than illegals.


Again another point that makes no sense. I can not take away a man's/woman's right to be an American just because they commited a crime. Every culture has criminals. This analogy makes no sense to me. You make it sound as if all these illegal immigrants are somehow incapable of rape, murder, steaing, etc. And that choice you gave is pointless, I have no right to chose who to make American, especially one who was born here. I admit I would chose a person who is not a criminal such as a rapist, muderer, thief, bigot or sexist, but I would not care if he/she was American, Australian, Brazilian, Cuban, etc. I don't base my taste in friends on what part of the world they come from. This is apple and oranges my frined and you are just trying to come up with analogies to back up your beliefs.

Let me tell you that juding by what I have read in the past week from you, I can say that we have a lot more in common than you might think, but I don't need to come up with weird, make no sense analogies to prove my beliefs. I back you up in the idea that we should not condemn an entire race and/or religion based on the actions of a few, but as I said before I can not discard the fact that it as a particular race with a particular religion where these extremist that threaten my life and that of my fellow Americans are from. No matter how much it bugs you, you can not deny this fact.

And there's your problem. You act like it is charity. In reality we beg them to come here. Every other million dollar home in LA is staffed by illegals. Most of your fruit was probably picked by illegals. The roofing industry would basically cease to exist in most of the US without illegals.


I'm sorry Baker (again) but "we" is a lot of people. Just like I have been told before you are generalizing a bit too much here. I begged no one. I expect my services to be done by legal means, if there are illegals in some of the systems I use they should be removed and the companies should be fined. But don't expect me to go out and investigate every company, corporation and mom and pop store to see if a legit American is serving me. I should not have to, that why there are laws in this country. And no I refuse to believe that any industry in this country would cease to exist simply because of the lack of illegal immigrants. What would happen is that not all of them will be driving BMW's and Benz' to work (the owners I mean) and people will just have to pay a bit more, but that doesn't seem to be a problem here since I am paying at least $1.50 more in gas than I was before, I am paying more for many items in the supermarket, fast foods have risen some of their prices, basically everything has gone up yet we have a strong economy and I have yet to hear about the millions of Americans all of a sudden homeless and starving due to raising prices. You give illegal immigrants too much credit. And maybe we should start asking ourselves why rich people need cheap labor, it's not like they can afford legal employees.

So this charity stuff is bunk. If we don't like them being here, then we need to stop the people who invite them here and pay them money to be here. If we aren't willing to do that because we like our fruit and roofing jobs cheap, then we need to shut up and stop being hypocrites.


I couldn't agree more with the second sentence. But I did not ask for any American business to break laws in order to save myself some money. We all know they charge up the ying yang anyways. $.25 to make a $5 lipstick, it's all bull Baker. We don't need illegals to make things cheaper, what we need is for companies, corporations and mom and pop stores to stop taking advantage of the ignorance of the average person and their laziness to go somewhere else to shop to make high, unearned profits. If I've said it once I've said it a thousand times, things are only worth what people are willing to pay for them, Walmart brand products are proof of that.
Reply #28 Top
We don't need illegals to make things cheaper, what we need is for companies, corporations and mom and pop stores to stop taking advantage of the ignorance of the average person and their laziness to go somewhere else to shop to make high, unearned profits.


No, we need to stop playing the victim and stop overpaying for stuff. I buy NONE of my electronics components at in town stores. Why? Because I can ALWAYS purchase better quality, better warranties, and lower prices ONLINE. So why even bother with the brick and mortar stores? If local retailers want my business, they'll need to change their marketing strategy.

And it's already worked. Walmart has significantly dropped their flash drive prices in our local stores because enough people went out and bought them online that WalMart couldn't SELL them!
Reply #29 Top
"This is apple and oranges my frined and you are just trying to come up with analogies to back up your beliefs."


No, it isn't. It's insane that we protect the idea of being "American" by making people pass tests and jump through hoops for years to become one, and then let child molesters, murderers, and rapists enjoy the status just because their momma squeezed them out here. If we really believe that you have to "earn" the title, then why don't people here have to earn it, or at least keep to a standard of humanity?
Reply #30 Top
No, it isn't. It's insane that we protect the idea of being "American" by making people pass tests and jump through hoops for years to become one, and then let child molesters, murderers, and rapists enjoy the status just because their momma squeezed them out here. If we really believe that you have to "earn" the title, then why don't people here have to earn it, or at least keep to a standard of humanity?


No, they do not have to "earn" it. Except one way. Obeying the laws of the nation they want to become citizens in. After all, the ones you describe - when caught, are put in jail for their crimes.

So for this whole argument, it comes down to 2 things. One, is that not all 12 million want to be citizens. And 2 is that those 12 million broke the law.

is it fair? Hardly. Life is not fair.

But no matter how much your heart bleeds, there is another truism that is inescapable. The USA cannot take in every person in the world who wants to live here - and survive as a nation. There must be a method of deciding who can and who cannot come into this country, and that decision will be made by man, and therefore imperfect and unfair.
Reply #31 Top
"No, they do not have to "earn" it. Except one way. Obeying the laws of the nation they want to become citizens in. After all, the ones you describe - when caught, are put in jail for their crimes."


Yeah, but they are still "Americans". By virtue of what? Hard work? Devotion to American ideals? Patriotism? Nope, just because they happened to be born here. I'm just saying that if we want to portray to the world that the title "American" requires the kind of standard we impose upon immigrants, maybe we should start reassessing the citizenship of these wastes of flesh that kill children and commit heinous crimes against us.

The gist of this blog seems to be that these people, even if they have been here for 20 years and worked hard and not broken the law, don't deserve to be associated with the title "American" because they haven't done the appropriate paperwork. If we are going to start looking at what that standard means, look at what we require of ourselves. I can contribute nothing to the country, and commit the most horrendous crimes imaginable and still be favored with a title we want to say other people pave to earn, regardless of their benefit to us.

Odd kind of logic.
Reply #32 Top

I say we round em up and use em for target practice, dress em in Terrorist outfits put them in mock up middle eastern villages and have our recruits get real time training, killing them.. solves the immigration problem, trains our military. Damn I am a genius!!


Damn, you beat me to it.
Reply #33 Top
"American" denotes nothing more than the nation of which one is a citizen and is in no way a qualitative term. Some of the comments here claiming otherwise are about as moronic as they come.

"British", "Indian", "Pakistani" etc. mean nothing more than nationality. If a person isn't a legal citizen they're not a legal citizen. Period.
Reply #34 Top
""American" denotes nothing more than the nation of which one is a citizen and is in no way a qualitative term."


Wow. Good bureaucratic answer for this particular discussion. On the other hand, when people are asked the question, or people write about what being an American means to them you come up with a LOT of different answers. Funny how sometimes it is chocked full of high minded ideals, and the next it is nothing but a technical title.
Reply #35 Top
It is nothing more than definition of legal nationality despite what other connotations people care to assign to it.
Reply #36 Top
So when people call each other unamerican, they are questioning the other person's citizenship status?
Reply #37 Top
So when people call each other unamerican, they are questioning the other person's citizenship status?


That's great. Next time rightwinger labels me unamerican because I don't subscribe to his backwards logic, I'll just e-mail him a copy of my Birth Certificate, proof positive that, despite his hate-filled rhetoric, I am, in fact, 100% American.
Reply #38 Top
Transcript of the third Republican presidential debate. Evidently "American" just doesn't mean citizen of the United States to many people besides Mason.

"QUESTION: With regards to illegal and legal immigration, in your opinion, what does it mean to be an American? What are the tangible and intangible attributes of an American?

VAUGHN: Congressman Tancredo?

TANCREDO: It means, number one, cut from the past. If you come here as an immigrant, great, welcome. If you come here legally, welcome. It means you've cut your ties with the past, familial, especially political ties with the country from which you came.

But let's be serious about this, you guys. We can talk about all the immigration reform we want and what it's got to get down to is this: Are we ready for a time-out? Are we actually ready to say, enough is enough, we have to stop all legal immigration except for people coming into this country as family members, immediate family members, and/or refugees.

Are we willing to actually say that and say, enough is -- we have got to actually begin the process of assimilating people who have come in this great wave of immigration.

The process of assimilation is not going on. And how long -- how long will it take us -- for us to catch up with the millions of people who have come here, both legally and illegally, and assimilate them? I'll tell you this: It will take this long: Until we no longer have to press one for English and two for any other language.

(APPLAUSE)

BLITZER: I promised, Governor Huckabee, you'd have a chance to weigh in on this immigration issue. Do you agree with Congressman Tancredo that the U.S. should effectively end most legal immigration into the country?

HUCKABEE: No, I disagree with that.

I think that there are a number of people that we should welcome into this country; certainly engineers and doctors and scientists that we may need legally coming here.

What we need to do is to have a border that is sealed and the same kind of process that we have to go through if we go into a stadium: We go in one at a time and we have a ticket.

That's the only thing I think Americans really are asking us for, is a sane, sensible system that's based on the idea that if you come here, that you come here through the same process that we would be expected to go through if we went to another country, which is not happening today.

BLITZER: Mayor Giuliani, are you comfortable with what Congressman Tancredo says about immigration to this country?

GIULIANI: No. I'm very uncomfortable with it. I mean, the reality is, it's one thing to be debating illegal immigration. It's a very complex subject. I think we've had a very good debate about it. And I think the bill needs to be fixed in the way that I've indicated.

But we shouldn't be having a debate about legal immigration.

Abraham Lincoln defined what an American is better than I'm going to be able to do it or Congressman Tancredo or anyone on this stage. Abraham Lincoln, who fought the Know-Nothing movement, said, "Being an American is not whether you came over on the Mayflower or you came here yesterday.

"How much do you believe in freedom? How much do you believe in freedom of religion? How much do you believe in freedom for women? How much do you believe in the right to vote? How much do you believe in the rule of law?

"The person who believes in that the most is the best American. And the person who doesn't isn't an American."

BLITZER: Thank you.

GIULIANI: And that's Abraham Lincoln's words.

We should always be open to legal immigration. It reforms us. It makes us better. It brings us people who want to make a better live for themselves...

BLITZER: Thank you.

GIULIANI: ... and their families. If we lose that, we lose the genius that has made America what it is.

(APPLAUSE)

BLITZER: I'm going to go back to Jennifer in a second, but I want Senator McCain to respond as well.

When you hear what Congressman Tancredo says, what goes through your mind?

MCCAIN: It's beyond my realm of thinking.

Look, America is a land of opportunity. The question was just asked, what is it to be an American? It's to share a common goal that all of us -- a principle -- are created equal and endowed by our creator with certain inalienable rights.

That means we go as far as our ambition will take us. That means we have a better life for ourselves and our children. And the lady that holds her lamp beside the golden door is still the ideal and the dream.

Of course it has to be legal. Of course that it has to be regulated. And 18 months, by the way, will go by while we fix the border before we do anything else on this issue.

But America is still the land of opportunity, and it is a beacon of hope and liberty and, as Ronald Reagan said, a shining city on the hill.

BLITZER: Thank you.

MCCAIN: And we're not going to erect barriers and fences.

BLITZER: Thank you, Senator."
Reply #39 Top

So when people call each other unamerican, they are questioning the other person's citizenship status?



Sure, why not?

re #41, Thankfully I don't base my opinions on a bunch of political rhetoric.
Reply #40 Top
That's unamerican, MasonM. Show me your papers.
Reply #41 Top
Papers are unamerican.
Reply #42 Top
So, what makes you American is inherently unamerican.
Reply #43 Top
No, what make me inherently unamerican is quite American.
Reply #44 Top
Then screw it, lets just all deport ourselves to Mexico.
Reply #45 Top
I can contribute nothing to the country, and commit the most horrendous crimes imaginable and still be favored with a title we want to say other people pave to earn, regardless of their benefit to us.

Odd kind of logic.


No one ever said it was logical (and actually you are mixing your logic). There are rules to being an American. Rules made by man. Man who is inherrantly flawed, and thus the rules are flawed. As is life, since life is not perfect.

What gives the right of Paris to be called a Hilton and to revel in the largess of long dead people? Rules. Rules that may not be right or just or fair, but rules.

That is what decides who is an American. And it is flawed and not perfect. But show me anything devised by man that is perfect and fair and just.

Rule number 1: life is not fair. Rule number 2: Refer to rule number 1.
Reply #46 Top
So when people call each other unamerican, they are questioning the other person's citizenship status?


YOu are again confusing 2 non-related items. As Mason says, the title American is describing citizenship. Not how it was earned or granted. un-American is describing an activity. One is a noun (person, place or thing). The other is an adverb, qualifying or describing an action. Each can be used as the other (he had an american run or He is Un-American - when infact the speaker is saying that his activities are un-american) as the english langauge can be bastardized to suit the users purpose. However, the words remain essentially different.

If un-american were a noun, it would mean that yes, you have renounced your citizenship and are no longer american. Other than some brain dead actors (who can be very eloquent while never understanding what they say), the accusation of "un-american" is used to say that the activity or statements are against america.
Reply #47 Top
No, it isn't. It's insane that we protect the idea of being "American" by making people pass tests and jump through hoops for years to become one, and then let child molesters, murderers, and rapists enjoy the status just because their momma squeezed them out here.


I understand your point here. But I believe that to be able to enjoy everything this country has to offer that so many other countries don't should not be as easy as signing on the dotted line, shaking your hand and saying "Welcome to American you are now an American". I do also believe that the system should be reviewed and made a bit easier, you are correct that they have to jump thru so many hoops that by the time they become legal citizens they will have cramps for years to come.

If we really believe that you have to "earn" the title, then why don't people here have to earn it, or at least keep to a standard of humanity?


I have to admit that the concept of stripping major criminals, such as "child molesters, murderers, and rapists" and the likes, of their citizenship sounds like an interesting punishment, but where would we send them? I seriously doubt any country would take our criminals, well, except maybe those who wouldn't mind using them as target practice or something. Besides, it's not as if they really care about being an American, they don't respect the law as it is.
Reply #48 Top
I seriously doubt any country would take our criminals


Cuba has a good track record.
Reply #49 Top
I have to admit that the concept of stripping major criminals, such as "child molesters, murderers, and rapists" and the likes, of their citizenship sounds like an interesting punishment, but where would we send them? I seriously doubt any country would take our criminals, well, except maybe those who wouldn't mind using them as target practice or something. Besides, it's not as if they really care about being an American, they don't respect the law as it is.


is this site now going fascist? are you people kidding me? talk about "closing the door behind you."

gonna start stripping citizenship of "certain criminals?" like that isn't the slippery slope to end all slippery slopes. after we strip the murderers and rapists (and let's all remember how far that definition has gotten stretched in the last 20 years)should we include the white collar criminals? after all, an embezzler or CEO that defrauds their investors can negatively affect hundreds or thousands of lives, where a murderer might only affect 1 or a handful of lives. same with rape.

then let's not stop there, let's strip all the dissenters and political enemies of the governement their citizenship ...after all, according to W, "yer either with us or against us."

i'm going to assume that some didn't think thru their comments above. and perhaps forgot the words of our 1st President, George Washington..."Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master."

Reply #50 Top
is this site now going fascist? are you people kidding me? talk about "closing the door behind you."

gonna start stripping citizenship of "certain criminals?" like that isn't the slippery slope to end all slippery slopes. after we strip the murderers and rapists (and let's all remember how far that definition has gotten stretched in the last 20 years)should we include the white collar criminals? after all, an embezzler or CEO that defrauds their investors can negatively affect hundreds or thousands of lives, where a murderer might only affect 1 or a handful of lives. same with rape.

then let's not stop there, let's strip all the dissenters and political enemies of the governement their citizenship ...after all, according to W, "yer either with us or against us."

i'm going to assume that some didn't think thru their comments above. and perhaps forgot the words of our 1st President, George Washington..."Government is not reason; it is not eloquent; it is force. Like fire, it is a dangerous servant and a fearful master."


I find it kinda funny that you picked my comment to say something about it when it was Baker all along who has been pointing this idea out.

Anyways I said the idea sounds interesting. I never said lets do it, I agree 100% or it's a great idea. You really need to get your head out of that hole it's in. Besides while jail times may be similar you can not compare a CEO stealing money to a murderer or a rapist. That is just plain stupid. A murderer took a life, a rapist took something by force physically, a CEO took material, granted not his but the odds of this kind of situation result in a death unless planned ahead of time would in the end be considered a murder. The only reason we care about white collar crimes is because somewhere along the line the Gov't loses valueble taxes they may have gained if the CEO would have not tried to steal the money. Stealing money and murder is not in the same category, you analogy (I'm starting to like that word a lot) is stupid. For that matter we should all call ourselves unAmerican cause in some way or another we steal from each other. How often does anyone return money if the store clerk gave you $.10 to much? How often does anyone get an ad letter from a neighbor and keep it or throw it away? How often do people connect to wireless networks that are not locked and use the internet for free? All the illegal music, movies and software flowing thru the internet, etc. It affects people as well, should we all have our citizenship taken away as well? You take you ideas way too far, talk about extremist. It's no wonder we can't find solutions to anything in this country, it's people like you who believe if a person throws a pebble over a bridge it could hit a car window, the driver could freak out, lose control crashing into a school buss that could then fall over a cliff landing on a train track killing all the kids inside while a train come by, crashes into the bus on the track derailing and spilling all the quemicals it carried that would then start fires and kill people in a 20 mile radius due to tha fumes being fanned by the wind. And you would probably think this cound happen for every pebble dropped over a bridge if it was done 10 times in a row.