Get used to it



Im sorry, I did think it was the UK but I didnt want to be wrong.


AHAHAHAH!!!

Apparently Mongosse is Schems play boy (no offense to you Mongosse, I guess we all have to make a living , just kidding )

Told you it was something sexual



I have no doubt about that, it was just the first time I have ever heard a person replace literal with liberal for something like a question.

the original point got circular, most people have appeared to agree with my stipulations, and we have since moved forward.

oh come on... that hardly warrants a "very" after illegal. everyone has seen a prostitute.

you have asked for my fiery wrath

first, wrong verb tense. second, improper use of a noun. third, misplaced (attempted?) verb usage.
and thats in half a sentance here. dont make me labor through the rest.

I didnt say MY mongy. I said mongy
he's someone else's playboy. actually, I just hacked his financial records... hm...
seems like several multi-billion dollar transfers to his private swisscheesian account from...
the empire? Emp I would at least expect your subordinates to be into female humans. (cough, unless they are)

by definition sure, but it doesnt fit the context well. its like saying that someone has a lust for apples. it fits literally, but it doesnt fit well.

Forgiven   



Must...think...of...witty....comeback



  



I'm rich and I don't care how!



Or maybe his subordinates are female?   

Wasn't saying that I am not used, beside just way off topic which is deflector technology.


Either they e-mail you or something, I haven't notice a single word relative to our stipulations therefore I can conclude that we both have points where people do disagree/agree is unknown.



Made it on purpose like that to show that you are "confusing" me with your specular grammar/dictions. Again the proper spelling of sentence is threes e yet in all your sentence misspelling you use twos. Again no capitalizing and no punctuation in "dont". Not to be a nitpick again, just mention what you did wrong with grammar/diction/punctuation.

Why the hell you link lust to meaning for literally? You both literally and liberally blow my mind away with meaning of lust(Going to assume you mistakenly link lust for liberal).

missed this part... eh?

of course, emp didnt have a clue what we were talking about, so he is excluded from the intellectual* part of the conversation.

oh surely.
so those thousands of other errors, what are those?

oh please dont be an idiot. its an example.
liberal is normally not used in your context, lust is not normally used in that context.
and how can I "liberally blow your mind away". these malpropisms are getting annoying.





*hardly...

Yes, we will have to talk about that. Your newly gained assets have caused you to move up several income bracket. Your now at the "Imperial Convistaction Tax Bracket".

So... start forcking over the money, I needs to get me a new SSD. Savvy?



You also said 'pet name', but we will leave it alone.

You have to say that I got you though.

And as to my subordinates, it is none of your bussiness what sexual alignment they have.



Im so proud

Partially true, I dont really dable in physics and aerodynamics, so in escense I personally didnt care.

Not to mention the amount of reading I would have to do in order to keep up.

I knew what you were discussing and all throughout I kept thinking... hm... this is pointless.

So I decided to turn the tides so to speak

TGE isn't excluded per se because he didn't take part in the discuss relative to deflector technology and can be consider to be observer part of "discuss". Which meant he don't discuss his opinion on it either positive/negative toward me or you. Therefore your argument is invalid to the point he is excluded.(Meaning he took no part at all in any form that I am aware of, TGE not to insult you at all)

Eh? Thousand of mistake where? I maybe type for this forum about thousands of letters but words don't even approach the thousand count.

Ugh took me about 3 to 4 hour to figure out that you was using malapropism(twos a misspell). As for how to blow my liberally mind away, notice from dictionary.com:Definition of liberal (#8: open-minded or tolerant, esp. free of or not bound by traditional or conventional ideas, values, etc.). I love the part where it say esp.(shorten version of especially) free of or not bound by traditional or conventional ideas, values.(hint: unbound If you still can't figure it out. Literally meaning not exaggerated and true to fact. Meanwhile Liberally can mean a "unrestricted" meaning. When I reply to your question "Why are you here?" I mean that the meaning of question is too broad/general. Like "How are you?" can have multitude of meaning/interpretation.)

I will attempt to fix your errors until you get tired of hearing how you misspell this and that etc... Then actually start using this forums' spell checking.(right click on word with red underline and fix them)

xavior, hopeless.

of course, an impartial observor would understand whats going on. contrary to
his own statement.

well then, I pity you even more.

You conjugate things wrong, you miss s at the end of words and you also forget to put in a and the and an before words which makes all the harder to read.

These are basics.

TGE, What did you meant by has to survive in this sentence?

Didn't you meant "need allies to survive"? Because by "that has to ally to survive" is sort of self-contrary because not saying "how much of has" can mean either small or bigger. Hence if being small then they can sorta skip the action of having an(you only need an if the next word has vowel as the first letter period, and I alway do that so hence I don't know why you are saying it is wrong) ally. If bigger than you need to fit bigger in there somewhere.

Wait a moment, being impartial observer(again twos e) has nothing to do with understanding. However reading do and in TGE's own statement he is saying he don't care to reads.

What i meant by 3 and 4 hour to looking something up was during the duration(most of it) I didn't realize you was using a real word at all hence the confuse over malpropism(twos a) mistake.

I will quote a statement from Warhammer 40k.
Source:WWW Link In other word, if I had hope I would just disappointment myself from having hope. From your statement of being hopeless meaning I am more likely to not disappointment. Right?-End Sarcasm

Actually "ally" can be used as a verb (a doing word (to ally yourself with someone)) so basically what Emp was saying is that the civilization must ally [itself] with something else.





Its nothing personal, if you can't help poor English so be it, for what its worth I can understand you fine (mostly), but don't get all grouchy at Schem and Emp and try to point out problems with their English when clearly we can take any sentence of yours and find numerous corrections.


Schem, Emp, if I missed any corrections, shh!

I was talking about urgency of needing allies, not the act of ally.

I wasn't being personally hostile toward anybody when I do the corrections.(Just to help you guy to understand how I doesn't understand what everybody saying.)

still, its a single a, not that hard to realize whats missing.

Well accord to dictionary your little mistakes don't even register with them. Which was one reason why I didn't realizes it was a word at first. It is extreme easy for me to remember how something should spells.(How you don't is of no business of my.) I had to fit in the blank that you was missing an a letter which was due to your bad spelling skills. At least I don't have to spend hours trying to figure out if a word should has s or a/an or bad conjugates.

The list of suggest spelling are.(From Dictionary.com)
malapropism
malapropism's
malapropisms
malapropisms'
malaprop's
malaprops
malaprops'
malapropos
Which make your point of easy to figure out it is missing an a is moot. Just notice that it also include another word malaprop.

Mi diccionario es tu utilizar. Es sí español.-Final del sarcasmo

...
of course, you seem not to register that those are from two root words, malapropism, and malaprop. which one seemed closer...

dont start... you are many times worse.

its not that you are incomprehensible (90% of the time), its just that you sound like a complete idiot.

Hmm that was strange I didn't submit it twice. Oh well that a forum problem clearly.

I don't have to explain the reason of listing those suggest for spelling eh? Guess you miss the whole point.

Hmm, Just a little problem with percent is it provable? Enough said.

this is one word... as is

this

and this is simply an absurd variation of malapropism.

now, if you bothered to click on any one of your dictionary.com links, you would realize everything you posted means the same thing.

half of these arent even correct. malapromism's? malapropism's what? a concept cannot 'have' anything.

dont make me laugh... nothing would be easier.

I sometime see your language come across to me as malapropism however I see nothing relative to malaprop. However some comments of your can be somewhat malaprop in context that they get out of hand and consequencely off-topic too.

If you actually take time too, you would realize malaprop meant something out of place whereas malapropism is simply bad grammar. No it isn't an "absurd" variation accord to dictionary.com.
Malapropism
Malapropos
Don't look at me about the concept having something. Again they were just included for completeness. I said they are list of "suggestive" spellings and I didn't invent them.

Then go ahead and prove its 90% of the time whereas I can prove that with each lines new grammar/language problems show up for you. BTW I didn't do it to make you laugh because you made me laugh at you in IRL.

i think my head might actually explode  

what happened to the good old days where scientist would say
"this dohickey is attached to this thingymbob...." and before you would know it
you would be in space.

sigh   

since engineers arrived. duh.

Last time I checked anyone said it like that was in science fictions mostly. Right? However lately science fictions have gotten more "realism" than simple mechanics.(They now mostly use either complex engine or larger engine.)

It was a joke



Not really the fact that he is an idiot. Clearly he is an intelligent person. However it the blatant fact that he wants to be supperior and will try to prove it by any foolhardy means, which usually end up critisized.



Yes, your right, I dont care to reads.

But I do care when I read.

I didnt say he was an idiot, I say he sounded like one.

but then again, theres always that part about neutronium being stable. that brings into question his intelligence... but I wont go there.

Me or him? Just curious here.



Me Superior?(Yes that one p) I alway welcome criticize (the s was c) because it help me to understand what you don't understand. If my post sounds somewhat superior then what part does?

Not to restart another nitpick wars here. I never said degenerate matter was possible under our current "Technology"/"Knowledge".