danielost danielost

BUSH SHOOTS DOWN UNARMED PASSENGER JET

BUSH SHOOTS DOWN UNARMED PASSENGER JET

this is what the headlines would have read if bush had ordered the first jet shot down before it hit the building

it wouldnt matter if he had proof that they were going to hit it

the main stream media would have reported it as bush attacking the jet and not trying to stop terriosts

and i am sure some where in the story would have been mentioned the proof
10,572 views 31 replies
Reply #26 Top
the miners that were killed 10 miles away 6 months later should be counted as part of the 9/11 attack


when that plane hit the ground it would have shaken the ground for miles around it even if you didn't actually feel it

the mine that collapsed wasn't dug properly
Reply #27 Top
Please, for the love of all that is good, read and pay attention to this website: Punctuation. It is your friend.

Until you can learn to at least link to something that will prove your (again, I state: frivolous) assertions, and can learn that PERIODS ARE YOUR FRIEND and COMPLETE SENTENCES MAKE YOU SOUND MODERATELY COGENT, you will continue to be laughed at.

Reply #28 Top
when that plane hit the ground it would have shaken the ground for miles around it even if you didn't actually feel it

the mine that collapsed wasn't dug properly


ok,,,there could be some validity to that, but that is not unlike all the people who are now suffering from or have died from all the dust, smoke and rubble that invaded their lungs on 9/11 in NYC and the surrounding areas.

so, if we count all those people,,,so what? does the number going from 1 to another make the tragedy any different? if the number was higher, does that change the justifications that we have made in our decisions since then?

i don't see how we could have reacted any stronger without just unleashing the nukes indiscriminately on the mid east. a higher casualty number wouldn't have affected our reaction.

and on your "where's the plane" point....ya can't have it both ways. you can't on one hand question if a plane even fell there and on the other hand, use the impact of that plane to add to the casualty numbers.

perhaps i am misreading what you are saying, and feel free to (politely) correct me if i misinterpret what you are saying...but that's what i gather.
Reply #29 Top
becouse i still say i didn't make a mistake there



So you are, literally, the only person in America who has access to the text of the Second Amendment? I have to wonder why they've posted a bogus copy of the Bill of Rights in our nation's capitol, written it wrongly in every civics textbook in America, taught it wrong to every lawyer in America, and yet given you special access?

You said you'd admit when you're wrong, you've just proven you won't. If you think I'm wrong, daniel, FIND THE TEXT AND PUBLISH IT WITH REFERENCES. You can't, because you're wrong, it's as simple as that. I've studied the Constitution FAR MORE extensively than you have, I can provide you with text references that I have in my library (The Heritage Guide to the Constitution being one), and yet you won't even bother to check to back up your alleged "facts".
Reply #30 Top
you can't on one hand question if a plane even fell there


i never questioned that the plane went down there

i said that they found the hole it made but not the plane itself

and i don't think the government could have moved it becouse a passenger jet is very big and someone would have noticed a skycrane flying with a damaged jet under it or a big truck again with a damaged jet on it

i just pointed out that they have not found the jet yet

one possibility is that it is buried at the crash site

and i believe they are trying to add the people suffering from smoke and dust to the numbers
Reply #31 Top
and i believe they are trying to add the people suffering from smoke and dust to the numbers


some advocacy type groups do. but i don't think it will ever be part of the official record. but stranger things have happened.