BUSH SHOOTS DOWN UNARMED PASSENGER JET

this is what the headlines would have read if bush had ordered the first jet shot down before it hit the building

it wouldnt matter if he had proof that they were going to hit it

the main stream media would have reported it as bush attacking the jet and not trying to stop terriosts

and i am sure some where in the story would have been mentioned the proof
10,572 views 31 replies
Reply #1 Top
And your point is...?


His point is, he's trying to pull in headlines by writing about something that never happened to appeal to his pals at the DU.

I'm starting to have a theory that when we get lefties here, they're the ones who were judged "too fruity" for the DU....because none of the NEW BLOOD (not talking about you regs on this one) has anything remotely resembling a cohesive point.
Reply #3 Top
The point is, your headline, what you used to draw readers in, is an outright lie...the kind of stuff that you can use to sell tabloids but has no place in legitimate writing, even if it IS blogging. You furthered the whole thing by not even putting any substance in the resultant article.

At least when I asked if John Kerry mutilated puppies, I didn't SAY he did it. I merely posed the question.
Reply #4 Top
At least when I asked if John Kerry mutilated puppies, I didn't SAY he did it. I merely posed the question.


John Kerry Mutilated Puppies?  
Reply #5 Top
The point is, your headline, what you used to draw readers in, is an outright lie...the kind of stuff that you can use to sell tabloids but has no place in legitimate writing, even if it IS blogging. You furthered the whole thing by not even putting any substance in the resultant article.

At least when I asked if John Kerry mutilated puppies, I didn't SAY he did it. I merely posed the question.





says one points whore to another?


He can say what he like how he likes on his blog so long as it is within the terms and conditions of use etc.

Who are you to rush in here with all the answers as to why he said what he said..God almighty? The owner of this site? Admin staff?

Who are you to tell him his title is wrong? Get off your bloody soap box!

Get off your arrogant, nit picking, self righteous I run this joint horse!!!! Be nice for once in your bloody life and stop being such a tossbag all the time!
Reply #6 Top
my title is what you would have seen in the headlines of the newspapers around this country if bush had had any of those planes shot down and that is why i put it that way
Reply #7 Top
(Citizen)little-whip


why are you talking to the owner of the site like that
Reply #8 Top
why are you talking to the owner of the site like that


LMFAO
Reply #9 Top
why are you talking to the owner of the site like that


Umm . . . son, "Frogboy" would be Brad Wardell, owner of the site.

"frogsleg" is an old user, exiled because she was rotten to others, back under a new guise.

So, in other words . . . . I'm LMFAO along with Tex . . .
Reply #10 Top
ok so i misread what she wrote then

Reply #11 Top
dan...you've been runnin all over this site puttin your foot in your mouth. yer becomin a miler...slow down, step back,,,check your facts before you go off accusing everyone of everything...and start again...

we all make mistakes on here and we all say something stupid or regrettable from time to time. no big deal...just don't go workin yourself into a corner that you feel the need to claw your way out of.

take care:)
Reply #12 Top
what ever sean but when i make a mistake i admit it and the only one with his/her foot in mouth is you

usely after you catch yourself in a lie telling everone one thing and then in the discussion finding out that it really was something else

so stop telling what i can and cannot post
Reply #14 Top

The point is, your headline, what you used to draw readers in, is an outright lie...the kind of stuff that you can use to sell tabloids but has no place in legitimate writing, even if it IS blogging. You furthered the whole thing by not even putting any substance in the resultant article.

At least when I asked if John Kerry mutilated puppies, I didn't SAY he did it. I merely posed the question.





says one points whore to another?


He can say what he like how he likes on his blog so long as it is within the terms and conditions of use etc.

Who are you to rush in here with all the answers as to why he said what he said..God almighty? The owner of this site? Admin staff?

Who are you to tell him his title is wrong? Get off your bloody soap box!

Get off your arrogant, nit picking, self righteous I run this joint horse!!!! Be nice for once in your bloody life and stop being such a tossbag all the time!


You've had enough of JU, eh bitch?

Like a bad penny you are.
Reply #15 Top
what ever sean but when i make a mistake i admit it and the only one with his/her foot in mouth is you


To my knowledge, you haven't admitted to your second amendment mistake...a pretty glaring one.
Reply #16 Top
To my knowledge, you haven't admitted to your second amendment mistake...a pretty glaring one.


becouse i still say i didn't make a mistake there
Reply #17 Top
At the risk of being bitch slapped for interfering, I put this here...

Reply #18 Top
what ever sean but when i make a mistake i admit it and the only one with his/her foot in mouth is you


To my knowledge, you haven't admitted to your second amendment mistake...a pretty glaring one.


no, he hasn't. nor has he admitted anything else. and he has been given every opportunity to man-up and explain himself. he chooses to play these lil games like miler. but at least miler has the occasional fact on his side. this one has yet to put together a coherent point.

above here, i tried to give him a chance to step back and take a deep breath and was again met with rudeness and hostility.

i wash my hands...
Reply #19 Top
Unless, of course, you enjoy being ignored.


no just bitch slapped

Try getting out of bed from the other side, it may help your mood. Lighten up.
Reply #20 Top
Maybe I completely misread this, but I thought that the point was simply that the President was in a no-win situation on 9/11. Either the plane could be shot down (and the title of this article would have been the resulting headlines) or the plane could strike--not really a choice I would want to have to make. Unfortunately, from what I read, I'm not sure that there was really time to make such a choice anyway (well at least with the ones that hit the twin towers)--and it is unlikely that you are going to "choose" to take out a plane over one of, if not the world's busiest cities.

So, that's what I read the article to say--which leads me to wonder if I've become so far removed from political thought that giving the President the benefit of the doubt is somehow now a DU position. Seems just the opposite to me...
Reply #21 Top
oh yea, and PS. did frogleg announce his/her retirement? what did we do to enjoy the pleasure of his/her return?
Reply #22 Top
i guess the real question is what happened to the fourth plane

it hit the ground they found the hole but they didn't find the plane
Reply #24 Top
true they found parts but they didn't find enough to make a plane from

and the miners that were killed 10 miles away 6 months later should be counted as part of the 9/11 attack
Reply #25 Top
Dude . . . what have you been smoking?



Whatever it is, it's some strong shit, man . . .



Would you like to back up any of your (frivolous) assertions or are you content to shit out supposed information and force us to search through your piles of fecal material for coherent thought?