Texas  Wahine Texas Wahine

I am not attracted to fat men.

I am not attracted to fat men.

I came to this realization today as I was walking my children to school.  I saw a fat Soldier in his PTs with his fat knees and his chubby face and it just clicked.

All along I have tried to fight this because I get so annoyed by men, especially fat or otherwise physically less-than-ideal men, making negative comments about overweight women.  The beauty standards American women are held to are so obnoxious, and it was refreshing to think that at least one sex could still get by with being "real" and "average". 

I had it in my head that since I am no Jessica Alba, or Jessica Alba's slightly overweight, buck-toothed, but still kinda cute cousin, for that matter, I had no right to demand...or even appreciate...qualities like fitness in a man.  I even felt kind of wrong for having such a hot husband, and even more wrong when he would work out a lot and get buff.  It would be like having one awesome, perky breast and a sad little droopy bit of flesh with a diseased green nipple beside it.  Very uneven and just somehow...wrong.

But I like what I like, and you know what?  If ugly, flabby men can imagine themselves deserving the amorous attention of Angelina Jolie, then what's wrong with a size 12 goofball like me proclaiming that men with knee fat are unworthy of any perverted leering on my part?

I like that my husband takes care of his body.  I like that he's attractive.  And I would be less attracted to him (physically, anyways), if he put on a ton of weight and ended up a doughy weakling. 

I'm entitled to be shallow and adhere to double standards, too. 

27,241 views 54 replies
Reply #26 Top
Me, I'm not superficial; I look at much more than just...whether they have 'the look'. I look at how/who they are on the inside.


First of all, being attracted to someone physically is NOT "superficial", Lucas, although I realize it's trendy to say so while you're in college, so I'll forgive you the obligatory college kid pomposity.

Secondly, I really doubt this is true. If you had someone come up to you whose body was covered with sores ooozing pus and who weighed approximately the same weight as your vehicle, I'm guessing you wouldn't give that girl a second chance, regardless of personality. You'd run the other way.

I have heard a lot of people brag on how they aren't hung up on looks, but I have never seen one of these people with a hideously ugly mate just because of their personality. Ever. John Merrick's phone never rang off the hook, ya know?

call it the "WKRP in Cinncinnati syndrome" - Everybody was always all hot 'n bothered about Jennifer Marlowe (Loni Anderson's character) but...the one the guys reaaaallly wanted was Bailey Quarters. I think because she was more down to Earth, more...I dunno...obtainable? More...real? More maybe like home. heh, like you I...


Or, Ginger vs. MaryAnn

Reply #28 Top
Caracarn: Thanks for the url. It's so fun to see pics of the people we interact with on her, and your fiancee is definitely a hottie!

What? I'm chopped liver? Lol, na, thanks for looking through them!
Reply #29 Top
I can cook, does that count for anything? I'm not a twig, but can any good cook be a twig?
Reply #31 Top
Sure they can...


I've read you talking about her before . . . it's good to put a face with the name!

And what a hottie . . .
Reply #32 Top
And what a hottie . .


what about ~ahem~ Rachel Ray, SC?   

(hey! there's another! Giada De Laurentiis vs. Rachel Ray)
Reply #33 Top
They are not twigs. Thin and twigs are different things. If I can see ribs, she, or he for that matter, cannot be a good cook.

I am, of course, biased.
Reply #34 Top
what about ~ahem~ Rachel Ray, SC?


How dare you mention the name of my arch-nemesis? How DARE you!

If I can see ribs, she, or he for that matter, cannot be a good cook.


If only you lived closer, I'd make you my incredible beef sukiyaki . . . yum.

Yup, no ribs to count here.
Reply #35 Top
Simon thinks Rachael Ray is FAT!

(walks away, cow-like, mooing at the moon.)
Reply #36 Top
lmao...the above comment, (and this one) is, of course, from LW.
Reply #37 Top
Simon thinks Rachael Ray is FAT!


maybe you misunderstood him. He might of said phat. (Pretty Hot And Tempting)
Reply #38 Top
I'm still working on my article of "Rachel Epithets" . . . I've got quite a few, but this nasty semester and extra hours at work are slowly sapping me of my will to live, and even more so my will to ridicule my enemy . . .
Reply #39 Top
Have a gander at these fat knees. eww





Reply #40 Top
I'd have to agree with her there, Lucas, you'd make any woman look unattractive by mere association with you.


Ya know...you're a realy piece of work. Piss off.


Could you possibly craft a post without 'meh' in it?


Could you possibly get a life and stop giving a care what i write? Seriously, it's annoying.

First of all, being attracted to someone physically is NOT "superficial", Lucas, although I realize it's trendy to say so while you're in college, so I'll forgive you the obligatory college kid pomposity.

Secondly, I really doubt this is true. If you had someone come up to you whose body was covered with sores ooozing pus and who weighed approximately the same weight as your vehicle, I'm guessing you wouldn't give that girl a second chance, regardless of personality. You'd run the other way.

I have heard a lot of people brag on how they aren't hung up on looks, but I have never seen one of these people with a hideously ugly mate just because of their personality. Ever. John Merrick's phone never rang off the hook, ya know?


Sorry to burst your bubble, but i would. I'm not like you, or (seeminly) the rest here. Secondly, beauty depends on who you ask. What you find beautiful, is different from what i find beautiful. For example, my girlfriend. I'm sure to you, she'd be ugly, etc....being who you are. But to me, She is the most beautiful woman in the world, there are none more beautiful than she. End of discussion on that.

Reply #41 Top
the old adage: "It's what's inside that counts."


If you mean it like i think you mean it...then (for once), I completely agree with you.

(Shocking, eh?)
Reply #42 Top
For example, my girlfriend. I'm sure to you, she'd be ugly, etc....being who you are.


God, you're an insufferable ass, Lucas. I try to have a reasonable conversation with you and you have to sit there and pull an attack out of it.

Yeah, you probably WOULD go with the 900 pound pus filled sore infested Jabba the Hut girl...because with a personality like yours, you take whatever the hell you can get!
Reply #43 Top
God, you're an insufferable ass, Lucas. I try to have a reasonable conversation with you and you have to sit there and pull an attack out of it.


You're the one that insulted me Gid. If i understood incorrectly, then I apologize.

Yeah, you probably WOULD go with the 900 pound pus filled sore infested Jabba the Hut girl...because with a personality like yours, you take whatever the hell you can get!


It's what inside that counts.
Reply #44 Top

If you mean it like i think you mean it...then (for once), I completely agree with you.


Is that an attempt at a really dirty joke from you? Wow, wonders never cease!
Reply #45 Top
Is that an attempt at a really dirty joke from you? Wow, wonders never cease!


Nope. Like I said, *if* it is what i think it is, then i agree. (Pretty much, if it is the adage 'it's what is inside that counts,' in terms of personality, etc....then i agree.)



Reply #46 Top
Judas, Lucas, you are dense.

But it sure makes it fun to read.
Reply #47 Top

Hmm....I think that being physically attracted to somebody is important.  That is, at least if you want to be in a healthy, sex filled marriage.  I mean, if you don't find your mate attractive (whatever attractive is to you) then are you going to be hot for your mate all the time?

People can claim all they want that looks don't matter, but I just don't believe it. 

And, Lucas, it is more important to be attracted to the personality of your mate, but don't discount physical attraction.  Saying that it doesn't mean anything to you is just kidding yourself.

Reply #48 Top
First of all, being attracted to someone physically is NOT "superficial", Lucas, although I realize it's trendy to say so while you're in college, so I'll forgive you the obligatory college kid pomposity.

Secondly, I really doubt this is true. If you had someone come up to you whose body was covered with sores ooozing pus and who weighed approximately the same weight as your vehicle, I'm guessing you wouldn't give that girl a second chance, regardless of personality. You'd run the other way.

I have heard a lot of people brag on how they aren't hung up on looks, but I have never seen one of these people with a hideously ugly mate just because of their personality. Ever. John Merrick's phone never rang off the hook, ya know?


This is INSULTING? That's BULLSHIT, and you KNOW IT, Lucas. You just decided to flame away at me because you thought I wouldn't fire back.

But if that's the way you want it, so be it. I can flame away with the best of them.
Reply #49 Top
And, Lucas, it is more important to be attracted to the personality of your mate, but don't discount physical attraction. Saying that it doesn't mean anything to you is just kidding yourself.


Hey, believe whatever you want to believe (obviously). I said what i said, and i stand by it. It doesn't matter to me.

I'll have to see what i can find on asexuality, because it could help explaining what i mean.

~Gid~

Yes, I found it insulting; it was not a flame, so just coold down a second, alright? I'm not going to get into a flame war with you. As I said, if it wasn't an insult, then i apologize for understanding it the wrong way it was meant. You know as much as i do that misunderstandings are possible.

Reply #50 Top
Yes, I found it insulting; it was not a flame, so just coold down a second, alright? I'm not going to get into a flame war with you. As I said, if it wasn't an insult, then i apologize for understanding it the wrong way it was meant. You know as much as i do that misunderstandings are possible


To take what I said as an insult you would have to be incredibly stupid, Lucas. Either you are or you came looking for a fight, which is it?

As for misunderstandings being possible, occasionally, yes. As often as you do it? No, sorry, I don't buy it!