Dr Guy Dr Guy

So Much for Bi-Partisanship

▼

So Much for Bi-Partisanship

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2006/11/29/112644.shtml?s=al&promo_code=29DC-1
from JoeUser Forums

Our newly selected senator from the not so great state of Virginia, has decided that war is better than peace. At a social at the White house for newly elected 'representatives' (and I use that term lightly), George Bush sought out Jim Webb, the FIRED Sec of the navy (it appears with good reason) during Reagan's administration, to ask about his son.

Webb's response?  FO!  Well, he was not that ribald (how I don't know, his social skills are on the level of alley oop).  But the intent was there.  So much for Reid and Pelosi's grandiose pronouncements of bi-partisanship. 

For the last 12 years, and especially the last 6, we have had to endure pure vitriol from the left as they proposed nothing (we had no power to!  Auntie Em!), but spewed enough hate to fill a battleship.

Guess what?  Nothing has changed except they are in power!  And they have not changed their tune! No Proposals, no solutions, just the same old hate.

FO they tell all and everyone!

Thank you for electing Jim Webb!  Welcome to his hell.  You dealt it, not smell it.

politics
10,739 views 30 replies
Reply #26 from JoeUser Forums Top
I notice the left refuses to even acknowledge, the exchange MIGHT be impolite.


Both were acidic in it as far as i am concerned.

In my opinion,

1. Bush shouldn't have asked.

2. Webb could've said something along the lines of, "Mr. President, I thank you for your inquiring, but...."

Could've made it less of a "fight" as some folks think.

Just because the link no longer lists the whole conversation does not in 2006 mean that it does not exist.


Ooh ooh, let me guess...it's cause the media is liberal and biased? ( )


Reply #27 from JoeUser Forums Top

mildly entertaining as it may be witnessing yet another of your futile attempts to bridge the ever-widening gap between that which you'd prefer to be and that which actually is, i'm not sufficiently motivated to contact webb's campaign for a full tally of what aired when and to whom.

And again I challenge you to produce how many times each ad ran.  As I explained to Shades, it does not matter if only one had had his son in it if it was the only one that ran, now is it? I fully understand your lack of motivation.  He is my senator and I am not motivated to contact him as I dont feel like getting an ear full of invectives.  Leopards do not change spots.

SoundPackager - Customize the Windows sound scheme
Reply #28 from JoeUser Forums Top

Ooh ooh, let me guess...it's cause the media is liberal and biased?

Wrong blog.  This one is not about media bias.  Try sticking to the subject.

Reply #29 from JoeUser Forums Top
Wrong blog. This one is not about media bias. Try sticking to the subject.


Dude, I was bein sarcastic. Try lookin up sarcasm and humor. Oh, and if you had read the following:


Both were acidic in it as far as i am concerned.

In my opinion,

1. Bush shouldn't have asked.

2. Webb could've said something along the lines of, "Mr. President, I thank you for your inquiring, but...."

Could've made it less of a "fight" as some folks think.



....you'd have known that I stuck to the subject.


Peace~
Reply #30 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply #25
thank you for taking the gentle ribbing in the spirit delivered.


gentle ribbing? gentile ribbing? both?


both kingbee.. where you been btw?