Gentlemen... and ladies if present,
Let us not disillude ourselves regarding the notion of the interests of this GUIC. There are clearly benefits to Stardock, any sponsers and the contestants who enter. To read forum posts regarding Stardock employees(?), who are monitoring the events therein, that they "do not have to have these contests take place" or that they "gain nothing by sponsering" is simply a misleading sense of practical business. Stardock and the artists that partake into these ventures are symbiotic. Designing a "great" skin serves a purpose that, I would hope others fail not to take notice, promotes a product far beyond what any simple advertising could even remotely hope to compare with. Meaning that, in the company's wisdom, Stardock understands that in order to move a product such as WindowBlinds, they will undoubtedly require many, many superior graphically-inclined GUI skinners to design for it to showcase and demonstrate the fantatic new innovations behind the software. This contest amounts to a very cost-effective means to advertise what WB5 has to offer. To argue otherwise is a mute point, I am afriad, considering any half-way knowledgible business graduate would likely agree. The skinners gain a small monetary compensation and a name recognition that is likely to push them towards a sort of "graphic stardom". Now that said, let us also re-evaluate what Lightstar mentioned earlier regarding these myriad of graphical "anomalies". If the point of this contest is to promote a product, then sheer wisdom dictates, that any criteria for judgement ought to include the ideals of judging these designs based on the merits of the product. Simply, if WindowBlinds benefits from a new design idea or feature, then a focus of said judging ought to include whether or not these artists make good use of that feature.
Another side note of "wisdom" that I feel many here, Stardock and some forum participants fail to undeniably understand: What Lightstar took precious time to comment on was an ideal based off of experiences in this market (both artistically private and commercially) that rival almost all individuals, including myself. Show some respect please. Agree with him or not, it truly does not matter. He has been actively involved in promoting that proverbial "quest for a better desktop" ever since the launch of Windows XP. More users are familiar with designs that bear his trademark signature and household name than the rest of the lot combined. This isn't fandom speaking for the numbers behind him simply do not lie. So know that when he does have something to say along these lines- it is for good reason. If we wish to speak in terms of someone not benefiting at all here, it is he and everyone here wishing that future contests be held in the fairest, most intelligble manner possible according to what is "good for everyone involved" ought to take note of these concerns raised and make an effective and logical use of them so that all may reap the most they can in rewards.
Business-wise, this contest also represents an investment. And for Stardock professionals to throw in their trivial gripes regarding the extra energy it takes to either listen to their customer base, or anything else asked of them in regards to this product due to lobbying, must simply not want to make money all that bad. And clearly is demonstrating a gross lack of professinalism. If someone does not wish to be part of this or be "here" - then don't. Everyone has a stake in this. I would think everyone would recognize that. As part of the comsumer-base that drives Stardock's ecomonic growth, talking-down experiences and shrugging off legitimately valid points backed by infaliable examples of proof, I think that you, Frogboy would be more conscientious of the points that Lightstar brings to light in regards to the overall benefit this contest, artisans and Stardock have only to bestow.
What we have here represents the inevitable "bottom-line" behind WindowBlinds and the total dollars Stardock requires to take-in to continue it's development. And if all can be interpreted from all of this and my ravings amounts to mere "flames" from forth-coming replies, then I mistakenly over-estimated the ability of all parties concerned, to "listen" and "understand".
Good day.