MasonM MasonM

Recent Nation-Wide Heat Wave Caused By Bush Policies

Recent Nation-Wide Heat Wave Caused By Bush Policies

According to recent super secret studies, President Bush's policies have led to war in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Lebanon resulting in the use of so many explosives that it has caused the atmosphere to heat up resulting in a heat wave throughout most of North America.

A recent poll conducted in a local tavern proves that 70% of Americans believe that Bush's policies have resulted in the current high temps in the nation. That number rose to 95% if the pollster was buying a round.

The same poll conducted closer to closing time proved that 100% of those polled believed that Bush's policies resulted in long lines to the men's room.
11,768 views 43 replies
Reply #26 Top
#24 by BakerStreet
Wed, August 02, 2006 4:34 PM



[BakerStreet]
notBush has spoken!!! All shall heed or be BUSH WHACKED!!!


BUSH WHACKED???? That sounds painful.
Reply #27 Top
Summer Nights Heating Up, Scientists Say
By SETH BORENSTEIN (AP Science Writer)
From Associated Press
August 02, 2006 3:06 PM EDT

WASHINGTON - America in recent years has been sweltering through three times more than its normal share of extra-hot summer nights, government weather records show. And that is a particularly dangerous trend.

During heat waves, like the one that now has a grip on much of the East, one of the major causes of heat deaths is the lack of night cooling that would normally allow a stressed body to recover, scientists say.

Some scientists say the trend is a sign of manmade global warming.

A top federal research meteorologist said he "almost fell out of my chair" when he looked over U.S. night minimum temperature records over the past 96 years and saw the skyrocketing trend of hot summer nights.

From 2001 to 2005, on average nearly 30 percent of the nation had "much above normal" average summertime minimum temperatures, according to the National Climatic Data in Asheville, N.C.

By definition, "much above normal" means low temperatures that are in the highest 10 percent on record. On any given year about 10 percent of the country should have "much above normal" summer-night lows.

Yet in both 2005 and 2003, 36 percent of the nation had much above normal summer minimums. In 2002 it was 37 percent. While the highest-ever figure was in the middle of America's brutal Dust Bowl, when 41 percent of the nation had much above normal summer-night temperatures, the rolling five-year average of 2001-05 is a record - by far.

Figures from this year's sweltering summer have not been tabulated yet, but they are expected to be just as high as recent years.

And it is not just the last five years. Each of the past eight years has been far above the normal 10 percent. During the past decade, 23 percent of the nation has had hot summer nights. During the past 15 years, that average has been 20 percent. By comparison, from 1964 to 1968 only 2 percent of the country on average had abnormally hot nights.

"This is unbelievable," said National Climatic Data Center research meteorologist Richard Heim. "Something strange has happened in the last 10 to 15 years on the minimums."

But it is not surprising because climate models, used to forecast global warming, have been predicting this trend for more than 20 years, said Jerry Mahlman, a climate scientist at National Center for Atmospheric Research and a top federal climate modeler.

It is a telltale sign of global warming, Mahlman said: "The smoking gun is still smoking; it's not shooting people yet."

One reason global warming is suspected in summer-night temperatures is that daytime air pollution slightly counteracts warming but is not as prevalent at night, said Bill Chameides, a climate scientist for the advocacy group Environmental Defense.

The records for summer-night low temperatures are part of a U.S. Climate Extremes Index developed by the National Climatic Data Center. Last year, in large part because of record hurricane activity, saw the most extreme weather in the United States since 1910.
Reply #28 Top
#27 by COL Gene
Wed, August 02, 2006 4:49 PM

Excellent article by a totally unbiased scientist. Thanks Col. It's obvious that Bush's policies have started this problem and only more taxation and spending the money to outlaw anything that impacts the environment is the real answer.

Thankfully, Bush will be out of office before too long and someone will be in office who will raise our taxes and fix all of these problems right away. Having too much money to spend leads to all sorts of problems and higer taxes will fix that. I'm looking forward to hauling freight in a horse drawn wagon, should be fun.
Reply #29 Top
" Last year, in large part because of record hurricane activity, saw the most extreme weather in the United States since 1910."


Listen to notBush!! Obviously in 1910 there was a Bush at work ruining the environment!! Other scientists say that the world hasn't been this hot in 400 YEARS!!! Obviously Bush policies were hard at work ruining the planet 400 YEARS AGO!!! Consequently, we can assume that GW Bush is IMMORTAL!!!
Reply #30 Top
Consequently, we can assume that GW Bush is IMMORTAL!!!


Of course he is. Don't be silly, everyone knows he's the AntiChrist.
Reply #31 Top
...or the anti-colonel, depending on your religion.
Reply #32 Top
Since the downside of Bush being wrong is so catastrophic, would it not be better to attempt to reduce greenhouse gases in the event we are making this problem worse?
Reply #33 Top
#31 by BakerStreet
Wed, August 02, 2006 7:00 PM



[BakerStreet]
...or the anti-colonel, depending on your religion.


Reply #34 Top
#32 by COL Gene
Thu, August 03, 2006 07:42 AM




Since the downside of Bush being wrong is so catastrophic, would it not be better to attempt to reduce greenhouse gases in the event we are making this problem worse?


Yep, you're absolutely right (err, I mean Left). We should take immediate steps to stop the problem. So, are you trading your car for a horse today?
Reply #35 Top
Since the downside of Bush being wrong is so catastrophic, would it not be better to attempt to reduce greenhouse gases in the event we are making this problem worse?


Yes, cause the only way to teach people to stop using their cars so much is to punish them everytime they use it. I really feel for your children, they must have an internal hatred for you for the way you raised them.
Reply #36 Top
" Since the downside of Bush being wrong is so catastrophic, would it not be better to attempt to reduce greenhouse gases in the event we are making this problem worse?"


You can't even frame this without Bush, can you? Kyoto was undertaken in the late 1990's, bub. Clinton never even took the issue to the Senate. Gore/Lieberman said they wouldn't unless developing nations were held to the terms.

In reality, none of the nations are really keeping to it. It's been found that they've fudged the way the data is collected, and Britain, France, etc., are all just claiming to keep to it and really aren't. Bullshit like this is never about the environment, it is about leverage against the most successful economic nations.

Do you really, REALLY think Russia, of all countries, can keep to these standards? Please. notBush is just wanting the US to compete economically with one hand tied behind our back, and the other constantly handing our money over to the federal government. He's no republican, not by a long shot.
Reply #37 Top
It is not just Kyoto. It is the Bush approach to dismantle the controls in place as well as not looking for new ways to help. If we had continued and extended the cafe standards we would be getting higher mileage and producing LESS greenhouse gas even at the SAME level of driving. If we had spent the money we wasted in Iraq to help industry develop alternate energy, build wind farms, and provide clean use of coal we would be a lot better off. Bush and his lame energy policy did NOTHING but give BIG OIL another $12 Billion dollar GIFT.
Reply #38 Top
And if there was a study that said we were economically hindered by environmental protocols, your silly ass would be right here saying that Bush is destroying our economy because of risky theories of global warming. How can anyone take you seriously when we know that your sole criteria for choosing a position is what the opposite of Bush's position is?
Reply #39 Top
Do you really, REALLY think Russia, of all countries, can keep to these standards? Please. notBush is just wanting the US to compete economically with one hand tied behind our back, and the other constantly handing our money over to the federal government. He's no republican, not by a long shot.


Don't forget all the other former soviet republics. Bishkek has the worst smog of any city I have been to!

build wind farms


Col, do you have a wind farm?
Do you have a wind generator on your house?
How about a solar panel?

Is it Bush's fault if you're too lazy to implement these. Oh wait no it would be his fault for not raising taxes and paying for them to be installed on your house. the NotBush logic (I think)
Reply #40 Top
On another note.

Mason, were the people surveyed have at leaset one drink? If so then we can determine that these surveys are the most honest as inhibition is lowered and the true responses come out. The more alcohol the less reservation and higher integrity of the survey. Arrrrrg back to de ship ay doc?
Reply #41 Top
BUSH WHACKED???? That sounds painful.


I hope that is not like Dynamaso's turkey whacking.
Reply #42 Top
Bush is responsible for not providing leadership for a energy policy that would have replaced the electric grid and moved us to less dependence on foreign oil. Global warming is not taking place per Bush so I guess the story about the heat is just another liberal lie!


Right, Col (rolls eyes).

Now, my memory may be hazy here, but I seem to remember not only 8 years of a Democratic President prior to Bush, but of a VICE PRESIDENT who is preaching on global warming as we speak yet effectively did nothing to reduce our dependence on foreign oil.

But I think that's my hazy memory. Bush has been President since the Constitution was written, and is thus responsible for everyone of the United States' historical ills. I do wish he'd have worked to end slavery and Jim Crow much sooner.

You're a loon, Col, and it's quickly starting to show.
Reply #43 Top
He should also immediately force all cattle and horse ranches to plug the asses of their animals so as to contain all of that methane which is a greenhouse gas produced by them in very high volumes.


You crack me up Mason.