Moderateman Moderateman

Al Gore, Anti-American Pig.

▼

Al Gore, Anti-American Pig.

More America bashing from the liberal left.

from JoeUser Forums
While in Saudi Arabia Al {I won the damn election} Gore showed once again why Democrats are completely oblivious to how most Americans feel.

"Gore said Arabs had been "indiscriminately rounded up" and held in "unforgivable" conditions. The former vice president said the Bush administration was playing into al-Qaeda's hands by routinely blocking Saudi visa applications."

When did we do this> why is he rabble rousing in an Muslim country? What is he trying to prove?: Wtf is he thinking? that of course assumes he has a brain, the moron.

When will Democrats distance themselves from blatant anti-American remarks?

http://www.google.com/url?sa=X&oi=news&start=1&num=3&q=http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/1107AP_Saudi_Gore.html&e=50203

http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/02/12/D8FNUKEO0.html

politics
12,623 views 49 replies
Reply #26 from JoeUser Forums Top
lol, notice that BenUser doesn't really cite anything, he just mentions issues. Must have been some memorable legislation that Gore took the strenuous step of voting 'aye' to. He was the first one ever on C-Span, though.
Reply #27 from JoeUser Forums Top
#26 by BakerStreet
Wednesday, February 15, 2006


lol, notice that BenUser doesn't really cite anything, he just mentions issues. Must have been some memorable legislation that Gore took the strenuous step of voting 'aye' to. He was the first one ever on C-Span, though.


and as usual bendrooler is wrong, wrong person, wrong statement, wrong time. where have I heard that before? ha!!
Groupy 2 - Organize multiple applications into grouped tabs on your Windows desktop
Reply #29 from JoeUser Forums Top

The SCOTUS was composed of 5 republicans and 4 democrats in 2000,

Actually, you are wrong.  If you want to go by who appointed them (since none list a party affiliation), it is 6-3 Republicans.  If you want to go by how they usually vote, it was 4-2-3 Dems-Ind-Reps.  So since you probably were still in grammar school then, your recall or text book learning is flawed.

Reply #30 from JoeUser Forums Top

Once again, the truth police needs to step in. Al Gore accomplished quite a bit in both the senate and as VP, but neocons aren’t exposed to those kinds of things because they don’t actually read the news. No, the “Drudge Report” is not a valid new source!

Clueless - That statement was about Kerry not Gore.  We know Gore invented the Internet!

Reply #31 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: Dr. GuyPosted: Thursday, February 16, 2006Once again, the truth police needs to step in. Al Gore accomplished quite a bit in both the senate and as VP, but neocons aren’t exposed to those kinds of things because they don’t actually read the news. No, the “Drudge Report” is not a valid new source! Clueless - That statement was about Kerry not Gore. We know Gore invented the Internet!


ben is in such a rush to prove his point, he does not bother to read what he is replying to.
Reply #32 from JoeUser Forums Top
Gore should be ashamed of himself, he continues to drive a wedge between Democrats and middle America.
Reply #33 from JoeUser Forums Top
sadly he did not use any of his 20 plus years in the senate to show what he was about, why you might ask, because he has done nothing of note in his whole career.

Once again, the truth police needs to step in. Al Gore accomplished quite a bit in both the senate and as VP, but neocons aren’t exposed to those kinds of things because they don’t actually read the news. No, the “Drudge Report” is not a valid new source!

A few of Al Gore’s accomplishments: served as a journalist in Viet Nam, promoted legislation to promote the Internet (although he idiotically claimed he invented it), environmental protection, government fraud and waste reduction...

Once again, the only defense of Bush is an attack on a democrat. Al Gore wrote books. I'd be surprised if George W. Bush even reads books.


You really should pay better attention if you're going to comment. The passage you quoted was about John "frigging idiot" Kerry NOT lame ignorant Al Gore!
Reply #34 from JoeUser Forums Top
Once again, the only defense of Bush is an attack on a democrat. Al Gore wrote books. I'd be surprised if George W. Bush even reads books.


I guess he's got a REAL short memory too. Did you forget what GW was doing when the planes hit on 9/11? He was "reading" a book to school children! Remember all the idiocy from your side of the fence on that?
Reply #35 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: ashamed to be a democrat(Anonymous User)Posted: Thursday, February 16, 2006Gore should be ashamed of himself, he continues to drive a wedge between Democrats and middle America.


wow a troll I can agree with.
Reply #36 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: drmilerPosted: Thursday, February 16, 2006Once again, the only defense of Bush is an attack on a democrat. Al Gore wrote books. I'd be surprised if George W. Bush even reads books.I guess he's got a REAL short memory too. Did you forget what GW was doing when the planes hit on 9/11? He was "reading" a book to school children! Remember all the idiocy from your side of the fence on that?


GWB was reading a book called ideas from the democratic party 1999 through 2001, it was a one page book with real big print@! hahahahaha
Reply #37 from JoeUser Forums Top
Did you forget what GW was doing when the planes hit on 9/11? He was "reading" a book to school children!

That's hilarious!
Reply #38 from JoeUser Forums Top
When will republicans stop trying to imply that one democrat, who doesn’t even hold a political office, speaks for all democrats.


Right. The fact that Gore was for eight years the second highest government official in the country is completely irrelevant. Gotcha.

While Gore doesn't speak for all Dems, he does hold a high position in the party, and directly affects party policies. He's hardly a fringe element within the party.
Reply #39 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: Gideon MacLeishPosted: Thursday, February 16, 2006When will republicans stop trying to imply that one democrat, who doesn’t even hold a political office, speaks for all democrats.Right. The fact that Gore was for eight years the second highest government official in the country is completely irrelevant. Gotcha.While Gore doesn't speak for all Dems, he does hold a high position in the party, and directly affects party policies. He's hardly a fringe element within the party.


that is why I call his actions TREASON!
Reply #40 from JoeUser Forums Top
lol, notice that BenUser doesn't really cite anything, he just mentions issues. Must have been some memorable legislation that Gore took the strenuous step of voting 'aye' to. He was the first one ever on C-Span, though.


A horse's fart is delivered with more intelligents and thought than a BenUser comment. He is LESS worth reading than ColGene.
Reply #41 from JoeUser Forums Top

He is LESS worth reading than ColGene.

Actually, at least he is somewhat diverse.  So while Col Klink is monotonous, benuser is just immature.

Reply #42 from JoeUser Forums Top
40 by ParaTed2k
Thursday, February 16, 2006


He is LESS worth reading than ColGene


I read gene so I can get my laugh for the day, and when he says "I do not hate Bush" man o man that really cracks me up.
Reply #43 from JoeUser Forums Top
#41 by Dr. Guy
Thursday, February 16, 2006


Actually, at least he is somewhat diverse. So while Col Klink is monotonous, benuser is just immature.


yeh I have been gentle with ben because I think he is very very young.. remember the very young are our future.. GOD help us! heh heh
Reply #44 from JoeUser Forums Top

yeh I have been gentle with ben because I think he is very very young.. remember the very young are our future.. GOD help us! heh heh

He will be working for my son, who while somewhat liberal now, is smart enough to learn and will be conservative by the time his first is born!

Reply #45 from JoeUser Forums Top
preaching to the choir...

It's called "tailoring your message"!
Reply #46 from JoeUser Forums Top
#45 by singrdave
Thursday, February 16, 2006


It's called "tailoring your message"!


maybe "knitting together a thought?"
Reply #47 from JoeUser Forums Top
Strange, the same people now supporting UAE are pummeling Gore for being supportive of Arabs.
Reply #48 from JoeUser Forums Top
" Strange, the same people now supporting UAE are pummeling Gore for being supportive of Arabs."


A total misrepresentation. What we are pummeling Gore for is posing the US as a gulag state for Arabs. If there is any condemnation otherwise, it is that he was there preaching total equality for Arab states in terms of visas while his cohorts were formulating outrage over the awful idea of offering Middle Eastern businesses equal access.

If you read the quotes that people cited in their outrage here, it isn't because he is embracing Arabs, it is because he is doing it by joining in their anti-US rhetoric. He's essentially lambasting us for the very thing his pals are preaching in terms of ports.
Reply #49 from JoeUser Forums Top
I do not think a former Vice President of the USA can be called an 'anti american pig". One must be correct in the use of language. I do disagree with Al Gore but I will not use this kibnd of language.