Al Gore, Anti-American Pig.

More America bashing from the liberal left.

from JoeUser Forums
While in Saudi Arabia Al {I won the damn election} Gore showed once again why Democrats are completely oblivious to how most Americans feel.

"Gore said Arabs had been "indiscriminately rounded up" and held in "unforgivable" conditions. The former vice president said the Bush administration was playing into al-Qaeda's hands by routinely blocking Saudi visa applications."

When did we do this> why is he rabble rousing in an Muslim country? What is he trying to prove?: Wtf is he thinking? that of course assumes he has a brain, the moron.

When will Democrats distance themselves from blatant anti-American remarks?

http://www.google.com/url?sa=X&oi=news&start=1&num=3&q=http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/1107AP_Saudi_Gore.html&e=50203

http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/02/12/D8FNUKEO0.html

politics
12,563 views 49 replies
Reply #1 from JoeUser Forums Top
sha boom! Oh yeh, there is no liberal media bias, rightttttttttt, we have ben treated to the MSM screaming about an accidential shooting, while Gores rant and hate filled speech went un-noticed.
Fences - Organize your desktop icons today!
Reply #3 from JoeUser Forums Top
When will Democrats distance themselves from blatant anti-American remarks?

When will republicans stop trying to imply that one democrat, who doesn’t even hold a political office, speaks for all democrats.
Reply #4 from JoeUser Forums Top
#2 by Donato Vazquez (Anonymous user)
Wednesday, February 15, 2006




Gore deserves a longer neck for his treachery


some would call this treason, I am.
Reply #5 from JoeUser Forums Top
#3 by BenUser
Wednesday, February 15, 2006


When will Democrats distance themselves from blatant anti-American remarks?

When will republicans stop trying to imply that one democrat, who doesn’t even hold a political office, speaks for all democrats.


hi ben how are you?

Add gores remarks to harry the gambler, nancy pelosi, howard dean and you have more than one democrat making outragious claims and statements
Reply #6 from JoeUser Forums Top
It's one thing to try to change America from within, but stepping into a nations like Saudi Arabia and stirring things up is very, very different. To play Gore's advocate, I'd say he thinks he is smoothing things over by saying the average American doesn't support these policies. I think he believes he's saying "DOn't hate America, just those who harm you".

It's that kind of naive bullshit that kept him out of the whitehouse. I believe that George Bush and the rest accept that politics is a dirty business. Gore, I think, has brainwashed himself into believing he can walk on water. At least he did say:

"Is it only for the West to say this is dangerous?" Gore asked. "We should have more people in this region saying this is dangerous."

which is true. I don't see Gore as evil, I see him as the grown man-children living in Disney movies that modern Liberalism turns out. He has no concept that there were probably people in that audience that would stand by and nod approvingly as he was beheaded.
Reply #7 from JoeUser Forums Top
Bill Oreily didn't let him off the hook, but then again he is kinda preaching to the choir........
Reply #8 from JoeUser Forums Top

When will Democrats distance themselves from blatant anti-American remarks?

IN answer to your question, when they perceive that maintream America is not buying their bull dookie.  Since they look to the MSM as what is mainstream america, they see reflection and affirmation, while the other 60% plus just shake thier heads and wonder what kind of idiot they are.

A reporter for Newsweek said that the support of the MSM would give Kerry 15 points in the last election.  That may or may not be true, but the affirmation the mainstream media gave Kerry was negated by the fact that real America was not buying it, and kerry was too clueless to realize that his message was getting out, it just was not the message anyone wanted to hear.

Reply #9 from JoeUser Forums Top
#6 by BakerStreet
Wednesday, February 15, 2006


I don't see Gore as evil,


nor do I baker, I just see him as a perfect example of what is wrong with the left today.
Reply #10 from JoeUser Forums Top
#7 by Dynosoar
Wednesday, February 15, 2006


Bill Oreily didn't let him off the hook, but then again he is kinda preaching to the choir........


Nope bill did not let him off, but when it's just one station reporting it's kind of like the sound of one hand clapping, specially when every other station is beating the "cheney shot someone" drum LOUDLY!
Reply #11 from JoeUser Forums Top
#8 by Dr. Guy
Wednesday, February 15, 2006


Kerry was negated by the fact that real America was not buying it, and kerry was too clueless to realize that his message was getting out, it just was not the message anyone wanted to hear.


WHAT MESSAGE WAS hanoijohn getting out doc> ? all I heard was "i can do it better" and anyone but Bush.
Reply #12 from JoeUser Forums Top
It must be so depressing to be an Senator one day, a Vice Presidential Candidate the next, then completely fall off the face of the relevancy earth.

Gore is about as memorable as a Ken doll with no face.
Reply #13 from JoeUser Forums Top
12 by ParaTed2k
Wednesday, February 15, 2006


Gore is about as memorable as a Ken doll with no face.


wow ted , nice anology, Gore is a bitter man that tryuly thinks he was ripped off in his place in history by the republicans in 2000, not giving a thought is was a LIBERAL DOMINATED scotus, THAT GAVE the decision to GWB> even the liberals on SCOTUS knew what a a lemon gore was and is.
Reply #14 from JoeUser Forums Top

WHAT MESSAGE WAS hanoijohn getting out doc> ? all I heard was "i can do it better" and anyone but Bush.

A Big one was "I served in Vietnam".  Another was the fact that when he had no platform, the MSM did not call him on it, so he thought he did not need one.

Reply #15 from JoeUser Forums Top
I don't see Gore as evil, I see him as the grown man-children living in Disney movies that modern Liberalism turns out. He has no concept that there were probably people in that audience that would stand by and nod approvingly as he was beheaded.


I couldn't agree more Baker. Not only would they nod, they would probably volunteer to perform the beheading. He isn't doing himself or his party any favors. Even Susan Estrich (whose voice I can't stand!) who is always defending the Dems, couldn't defend his actions.


some would call this treason, I am.


I would too.
Reply #16 from JoeUser Forums Top
#14 by Dr. Guy
Wednesday, February 15, 2006


A Big one was "I served in Vietnam". Another was the fact that when he had no platform, the MSM did not call him on it, so he thought he did not need one.


sadly he did not use any of his 20 plus years in the senate to show what he was about, why you might ask, because he has done nothing of note in his whole career.
Reply #17 from JoeUser Forums Top
#15 by JillUser
Wednesday, February 15, 2006


don't see Gore as evil, I see him as the grown man-children living in Disney movies that modern Liberalism turns out. He has no concept that there were probably people in that audience that would stand by and nod approvingly as he was beheaded.


I couldn't agree more Baker. Not only would they nod, they would probably volunteer to perform the beheading.


hmmmmm would gore be any less stupid after a beheading? now that's an intresting question.

Susan Estrich remind me of Carol Channing, whos voice I could not stand either, but at least carol can sing.
Reply #18 from JoeUser Forums Top
A Big one was "I served in Vietnam". Another was the fact that when he had no platform, the MSM did not call him on it, so he thought he did not need one.


I started calling it "The Battle of the Lieutenants", since that's all anyone seemed to want to talk about. I guess we should have given them both a Map, Compass and Radio. The Real Lieutenants would have been the one who couldn't make either work. ;~D
Reply #19 from JoeUser Forums Top
#18 by ParaTed2k
Wednesday, February 15, 2006


The Real Lieutenants would have been the one who couldn't make either work. ;~D


the real louies would be the one handing the compass, radio and maps to a sgt. making sure everything waas right. hahaaha
Reply #20 from JoeUser Forums Top
sadly he did not use any of his 20 plus years in the senate to show what he was about, why you might ask, because he has done nothing of note in his whole career.


Very true. And while blogdom was asking that question, the MSM was silent. The MSM is not the only source for news, and it showed in 04.
Reply #21 from JoeUser Forums Top
is was a LIBERAL DOMINATED scotus, THAT GAVE the decision to GWB> even the liberals on SCOTUS knew what a a lemon gore was and is.

That’s way wrong. That’s about as wrong as saying the earth is flat (although some Bush supporters may believe that to be true).

The SCOTUS was composed of 5 republicans and 4 democrats in 2000, just like it is today, and they ruled 5-4 along party lines to stop the recount. They had ruled 7-2 that the recount process was in violation of the constitution, but the republican hacks in the SCOTUS prevented a remedy by not allowing time to do a valid recount and in effect, stopping the recount and handing over the presidency to Bush.
Reply #22 from JoeUser Forums Top
21 by BenUser
Wednesday, February 15, 2006


That’s way wrong. That’s about as wrong as saying the earth is flat


the earths not flat? yikes.

Btw it's not how the scotus members GOT IN OFFICE IT'S HOW THEY VOTE and they vote mostly liberal. It does not matter who appointed them. OK?

you sure the earth ain't flat?
Reply #23 from JoeUser Forums Top
#20 by Dr. Guy
Wednesday, February 15, 2006


sadly he did not use any of his 20 plus years in the senate to show what he was about, why you might ask, because he has done nothing of note in his whole career.


Very true. And while blogdom was asking that question, the MSM was silent. The MSM is not the only source for news, and it showed in 04.


that is why we need to keep a fire under the left doc, to make sure THE TRUTH GETS OUT THERE@!!
Reply #24 from JoeUser Forums Top
sadly he did not use any of his 20 plus years in the senate to show what he was about, why you might ask, because he has done nothing of note in his whole career.

Once again, the truth police needs to step in. Al Gore accomplished quite a bit in both the senate and as VP, but neocons aren’t exposed to those kinds of things because they don’t actually read the news. No, the “Drudge Report” is not a valid new source!

A few of Al Gore’s accomplishments: served as a journalist in Viet Nam, promoted legislation to promote the Internet (although he idiotically claimed he invented it), environmental protection, government fraud and waste reduction...

Once again, the only defense of Bush is an attack on a democrat. Al Gore wrote books. I'd be surprised if George W. Bush even reads books.
Reply #25 from JoeUser Forums Top
24 by BenUser
Wednesday, February 15, 2006


sadly he did not use any of his 20 plus years in the senate to show what he was about, why you might ask, because he has done nothing of note in his whole career.

Once again, the truth police needs to step in. Al


this might be the truth except doc and I were talking about hanoijohn kerry, next time read slowly, use a dictionaary or we can type with smaller words so you won't get all confused.