Our political right is very horny.
So is, one can assume, the entire population. I understand Bild has very high reader numbers.
We europeans are a bit more liberal regarding sexual topics, so naked ladies covering most of page 2 of a DIN A2 sized "newspaper" isn't that big of a deal.
I know that.
Tits are also no indication of left/right political stances. I also didn't state that - I indicated that Bild values tits over content.
So do I.
At least pictures of tits don't steer the readers into a killing frenzy like some articles.
By the way, I write newspaper in quotes because Bild was once sued and legaly barred from calling itself a newspaper on behalf of overwhelmingly not following basic journalistic principles (like reporting facts).
Sounds ridiculous. I read German news papers and they are, like most media, usually devoid of facts and full of opinion (and full of something else, too).
To single out one of them and complain about the lack of facts in its articles seems silly to me, especially when the paper in question features tits and penis articles.
I would be surprised to see a German newspaper that reports more factually than Bild does, to be honest.
Would you have any examples? Like a subject in question and the Bild's and some other paper's take on it?
I also never mentioned right-extremists - that was something you brought up, as well as the stupid nazi stuff.
I just wanted to make it clear whom one allies with if one is against the "Bush Wars" in order to point out that being for the "Bush Wars" is not necessarily a sign of evil.
I can just mean that one opposed the extreme left and extreme right and fascist dictatorships.
Our right wing politicians (mostly CDU - Christian Democratic Union) are not nazis either. Ideologically the CDU is comparable to your democratic party, while our right wing extremist (those focusing on nationalistic topics) are comparable to your republicans.
You really have little idea of American politics, or German politics.
The Christian Democrats are comparable to the American Republicans. Your right-wing extremists hated George Bush.
The American Democrats are similar to the German Social Democrats, except that Obama is considerably more to the left than the SPD is.
I have met many Germans who don't know anything about the American Republican Party and in their ignorance decide to move them into the NPD/DVU/Republikaner sector of politics (yes, there is a German neo-Nazi party calling themselves "Republikaner"; I guess that makes it difficult for Germans).
In the states you will find right-wing extremists (i.e. white supremacists and the like) in both parties, but more prominently among the Democrats (who have a KKK man in the senate) who were traditionally the party of segregation. (The guy standing in front of the school building not allowing black students in was a Democrat.)
The Republican party also doesn't focus on nationalist topics. In the last elections it was the Democrats who focused on the black-white issue, not the Republicans. And George Bush's policies had absolutely nothing to do with nationalism (which is why he was roundly condemned by white supremacists and German neo-Nazis).
I'm not saying that to insult your republicans - that's just the way it is.
And it might explain why there are so many instances of europeans calling Bush&Co a nazi.
It does explain it. It's sheer ignorance.
You people believe, without knowing much about it, that the Republican party are somehow the same as your neo-Nazis (who are strictly opposed to George Bush's policies), hence, you conclude, Bush is a "Nazi".
I am assuming your definition of "Nazi" might be this:
"Nazi"
noun
A person who sides with Israel against the dictatorships that surround it, with ethnic minorities against the dictatorships that rule them, and with small countries against dictatorships that attack them.
