What I find fascinating about the outlook thing: Really there's just no reason to use it at home. There's plenty of applications that do the same thing, better, and for free - not to mention web applications. I agree Dr Guy. As a matter of fact, the average user could use Zoho, Gdocs, or Open Office anyway:)
I have to wait for all my addons to be compatible, the features aren't that stunning to have me running out to part with that kind of money :) One thing I have to say is that office remains pretty unfortunately priced. http://office.microsoft.com/en-us/buy/office-2010-which-suite-is-right-for-you-FX101825640.aspx Home/Student will run ya a buck fifty. Add an extra 100 and some change, and you get home and student with outlook. Seriously? Outlook is
Where I've been: First and most important: In the most anti-climactic championship in sports history , the Chicago Blackhawks won the Cup. We had a rally, and everybody was drunk . At the same time, we're having the <a href="http://www.chicagof
[quote]Straight people do not have that right either, since most states deny them the right to marry their siblings or first cousins.[/quote] Are there laws that say that straight people can't serve openly in the United States military? [quote]That argument is used by pedophiles and zoophilist. [/quote] And of course, that's bunk . Being a child molester is illegal. Entering into a government sanctioned contract with another adult should not be.
[quote]Agree or not, believe it or not, homosexuality is patently a destructive sexual behavior whether it’s consensual or not. [/quote] Oh yeah? How? let's hear it. [quote]Last year the Department of Defense reported that male on male assault was up 7 percent. Gotta ask….Is there nothing wrong with that Dan?[/quote] Look, I can tell that sexuality isn't your strong suit. Rape is not about sex. It's about power.
[quote]Gays have never been denied any rights not afforded to anyone else.[/quote] Well except for the right to server openly in the US military and get married to life long partners....... When you have groups of people who are being treated like second class citizens, there's a problem. Residents Wingnutistan like Nitro will parade the "ITS NOT CIVIL RIGHTS BECAUSE THE GAYS HIJACKED THE GOOD CIVIL RIGHTS FROM THE 60's" canard out there as soon as the
[quote]'ve heard of it being applied in two rape cases with men as the victims. I know it was applied in at least two cases dealing with women as the victim. I also have knowledge of one case were the attacker was female.[/quote] so this sodomy law applies primarily to issues of sexual assault?
Stardock Forums
[quote]Similar Motives? In the first place, you are hardly a svengali and so you can only impute motives. [/quote] I'm not sure I understand the problem. Both are religious extremists. Both are from Abraham religions. Both hate gay folks. I know, I know, the FRC doesn't come out and say "we hate homos", but their actions indicate otherwise. [quote]However it is not the right to do house cleaning, as that wo
Actually not a bad piece at The Daily Beast . People are still hurting, the president conceded, but look on the bright side: Unemployment has fallen two whole percentage points to 9.7 percent, and the economy is getting stronger, with three consecutive quarters of positive GDP growth. <blockquot
Stardock Forums
[quote]Talibanesque for voicing an opinion? Again I fail to see the equivalency between speaking your mind and blowing up people.[/quote] When the spirit of the opinion represents something that is philosophically aligned with something that the Taliban would agree with, it could be classified as Talibanesque. Again: I'm pointing out that similar motives. [quote]Just because those are christian fundamentalist organizations and maybe in the forefr
[quote]Show me the document that states a persons "civil right" to be gay or straight for that matter and I will apologize to you. Gay civil rights is a phase that group uses in a an attempt to equate themselves with the civil rights movement of the 60's in order to advance their agenda.[/quote] BWA HAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAH Oh god. This is good. Tell us again Nitro, about how you really are ok with gay folks, but you don't think they should be serving if
Maybe it's just that the guy who wrote it is a tool.
[quote]If you don't mind me going off topic here for a sec but can I ask how you came to joeuser? It's a simple curiosity since things have been slow lately around here and all of a sudden you [/quote] First: I'm not really one for the on topic/off topic stuff. I really don't care. To me, a good blog post should generate a little bit of both types of comments. As to how I came here, you can blame Microsoft. Basically, I'm stuck with crappy windows X
Yeah. I don't know. Village Voice : As Lorenzana's lawsuit puts it, her bosses told her that "as a result of the shape of her figure, such clothes were purportedly 'too distracting' for her male colleagues and supervisors to bear." I actually had to chew on this
[quote]My question was much more than "do you have an ax to grind".[/quote] Not really. [quote]And yes I'm against anything that would increase paperwork even 1/100th of a percent, especially during this time of war. [/quote] Again: you're a laugh. Here we have an issue of basic civil rights and you're digging your feet into the floor over 'paper work'. [quote]Everything seems black and white with you doesn't it.
[quote]You're asking me, who is not an author of the UCMJ in any shape or form, a question about why an article is written the way it is? [/quote] Well based on the language of it, it would seem that if you had any carnal interactions with women during your stint in the military, that there are elements of this article that would have applied to you directly. Or, even if you chose some sort of weird celebratory, you would certainly be aware of soldiers who it did apply to. 
[quote]Phoenix? Yeah it does have some crime and kidnapping issues but I don't think we're talking about kids. I have a friend who grew up in Phoenix and said that the food/eatting experience there is great.[/quote] Meh. Phoenix always felt to me like a gigantic strip mall. Like the nightlife consisted of faux Irish pubs and being able to dine at TGI Tuesdayigans. Scottsdale is basically LA's little brother. Some people like Phoenix. I really don't. <p
Stardock Forums
[quote]It is not logically correct to use all inclusive statements like making the connection that all Christian Fundamentalist fall in line with what the Family Review Council says or does.[/quote] How granular do you really want to be? I mean the FRC and AFA are amongst the 2 biggest 'public' faces of the American Christian fundamentalist movement. [quote]I could go a step further and say that Uganda, Rwanda, and Haiti (all three have mixed other religions in with
This looks promising: http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/blogwriter/id286094270?mt=8 I'm pretty sure it's metawebblog compatibility you're looking for. Most post via api software features auto detect too. FWIW, I use Blogilo from my desktop via: https://www.joeuser.com/api/MetaWeblog.axd
I'm sure there's an app that will let you post via the mt api or something...... Well I'm sure you can post from an API, but I'm not sure what the ap is called nor which api you'd have to use.
[quote]Oh, you are going to have LOTS of problems! You just dissed their religion.[/quote] Yes. And they have Tim Tebow. doh
[quote]You're an idot... it was obviously a cut and paste from the UCMJ article in referance to another posters question...you know, concerning the laws at the "job". It's not my opinion it is a fact. I did not express an opinion. [/quote] I know. I'm trying to figure this out: 'Sodomy' is generally defined as digital, oral, or anal sex (amongst other bedroom behavior that---in more victorian eras was viewed as 'unnatural'.) The text of the UCMJ include
[quote]It seems some shit for brains can't keep their discussions separate or relevant to their own topic when they are asked a legitimate question. [/quote] You asked a legitimate question. I gave a legitimate answer. I even cited some great examples in the process of explaining my answer, one of which was a clarion showing of the duplici
when I read this bit : 1. I really like Ari Fleischer. I never had any fondness for McClellan or that tool Snow. But Fleischer was good. 2. I really don't like Helen Thomas. Sure, maybe she was blitzed and yeah she's old and we know she's not all that sharp anymore, but I"m not sure this one slides.
JoeUser Forums
I just noticed this which, assuming you have maintain a healthy connection with the real world, should tell you that there is a fairly popular element of the moral values crowd that really doesn't have any business in the year 2010. Anyway, it's a good thing as we were just talking about this very same topic on another thread. Y