JorgenCAB

JorgenCAB

Joined Member # 3472732
0 Posts 0 Replies 11,310 Reputation

You don't even need the battle viewer for that. The rules that govern ship behavior are very deterministic as you can see from my test results above. Just put defenses on ships such as Assault and Escorts and weapons on Capitals and Guardians and you are good to go (In MP it will be different though)... ;) As for what Voyager were trying to say I would agree that a real battle viewer with real combat would be nice, I actually though it was tha

90 Replies 417,354 Views

A sensor ship on turn one is most probably the best strategy to grow your civilization exponentielly fatser than the AI. Let's say you play the Terrans... you rush the sensor ship in turn one (2000 CR) and head for the closest good planet with your colony ship on turn two and rush the cheapest possible colony ship to colonize Mars. You spam factories on mars and rush a few labs on earth. You Research interstellar travel,

233 Replies 1,013,810 Views

[quote who="JorgenCAB" reply="216" id="3551697"] The main problem is where the focus of the AI learning how to play the game should be developed? If you are eventually forced to min/max your colonies and build 25 hex range sensor boats on turn one to keep up with the AI on even Normal the game will turn into micromanagement hell, especially on large maps. I would like to see players cry when the AI send their 30 hex movement transport in to invade their undef

233 Replies 1,013,810 Views

[quote who="vadzra" reply="13" id="3551715"] That's why taking patriotic is a must IMHO. All of these problems, costly buildings, techs, possible reduction in production/research/money eliminated upfront. It is way a stronger benefit than others. [/quote] Anythin

23 Replies 93,339 Views

But that is only in the short term... I agree that in the short term you are mostly better of with pure enhancement improvement. But games can last many hundreds of turns, even well more than a thousand turns if you don't use that victory condition. After a certain point you will gain allot more from population improvements rather than pure bonus enhancement buildings.

48 Replies 136,828 Views

While it is possible to get hundreds of planets on an insane map though building stations and approval buildings and other bonuses it will become quite hard to settle new worlds after a while since they start with huge negatives in morale. it is also not a clear cut case if it is worth the overall population loss on all your colonies you could otherwise get. If you have 100 colonies and settle a new colony you essentially remove a minimum of 20 population cap in total o

23 Replies 93,339 Views

The main problem is where the focus of the AI learning how to play the game should be developed? If you are eventually forced to min/max your colonies and build 25 hex range sensor boats on turn one to keep up with the AI on even Normal the game will turn into micromanagement hell, especially on large maps. I would like to see players cry when the AI send their 30 hex movement transport in to invade their undefended colonies deep inside their territory etc... &n

233 Replies 1,013,810 Views

joeball123 math a pretty serious and accurate... I have not done them as explicit as he and rather used a rough estimation. The general rule of thumb in most cases are that you use about 40-60% of a planet for supportive infrastructure, slightly less for pure industrial planets. You then dedicate the rest for whatever you want this planet primarily to do. Supportive infrastructure may be some industry, food, approval, influence, tourism or militar

48 Replies 136,828 Views

I would say Patriotic is a bit OP at an insane galaxy in it's current state, to the point the AI will become a pushover by mid game. But then again that depends on your definition of what is fun? I do think the LEP will go through some iteration of balancing over time, but currently you are probably better of lowering the number of habitable planets on insane maps for now to have a balanced and fun game.

23 Replies 93,339 Views

[quote who="charon2112" reply="6" id="3551564"] I thought that when you click once on an improvement, the number that shows up in the circle is the current level of the building. If it isn't, where does it currently show the level of the building? Also, buildings don't start at level one? That seems counter-intuitive. [/quote] Buildings don't have levels, they are upgraded to new versions and each have it's own graphical repre

12 Replies 46,249 Views

I have not experience your direct problems in any of my games on Normal but I the AI do get bonuses to range and all sort of help on harder difficulties. These bonuses will diminish as the AI get smarter, I'm sure of that. An AI that starts spamming ships are typically a military inclined race that focus allot in"Manufacturing" and "Military Manufacturing" in particular. You can often view that on the power graphs. All in all it is not all too

30 Replies 155,323 Views

Ok... did some battle against pirates with smaller more simple ships... The result are that damage is randomized, have managed to get a slight difference, it's just it matters very little given how deterministic ships target other ships. In the test I had one tiny ship with 24 shields designated as "Assault" and one tiny ship with 6 laser strength designated as "guardians" and no modifications. The pirates had two small ships with a total of 8

90 Replies 417,354 Views

Yes, the position and role of the ship do matter... I know that for sure... but here are some more observation running rampart with the crusader in the campaign. In the battles I mentioned above no matter in which order or even between turns did the outcome of the battle change at all.... Every time I engaged the bigger stack of Drengine ships the Crusader ended up the winner with 278 HP. Every time I attacked the weaker stack second the crusader regenerated to 377 HP w

90 Replies 417,354 Views

I only play on insane maps and do quite fine with maximum two sensors and a survey module as the cap on number of sensors I need, that and I modded stations to have much further sensor range on their sensor modules. Ship range already scale with map size as far as I can tell. I see no immediate reason to scale sensors on bigger maps, the whole reason to play on them is to make the game epic and not to make them feel as small as a smaller map just

233 Replies 1,013,810 Views

And... allowing obvious abusive game mechanics that can easily be changed to make the AI more competitive seem like an odd choice to me. Why allow players to use a feature to make it easy and then let the AI cheat by knowing where all the good planets are on higher difficulties to compensate. This does not make any sense to me what so ever. If you play the game with no abuse of game mechanics the AI actually are a pretty decent opponent. You can still beat Normal fairly

233 Replies 1,013,810 Views

[quote who="BuckGodot" reply="17" id="3551353"] One has to be careful though not to "lock out" either casual players or folks who aren't taking "full" advantage of adjacencies and souped-up buildings by making buildings/ships too expensive. It's the classic problem of Power Player versus Casual Gamer (which is more of a spectrum, but I digress). Still, if folks think it is too easy to build things late game and/or think buildings and ships should be much mor

52 Replies 67,194 Views

Yes, what actually scared me was that it did not change depending on which combat I resolved first... having a ship with 750 HP get to exactly 278 HP in the same combat against the same stack although it had been into one, two or no other combat first in the same turn seem quite worrisome to me... as I said... I will keep testing this. This really has to be a very unlikely coincident.

90 Replies 417,354 Views

[quote who="Kordanor" reply="29" id="3551219"] The Wiki, which is also checked by the Devs afaik, states: Combat Viewer Players can choose to autoresolve battle directly from the main map, or watch it play out in the combat viewer. This has no effect on the outcome of battle; the combat viewer does not allow players to control their fleets -- though it may give better insight into why a fleet is performing poorly or doing well

90 Replies 417,354 Views

To me it basically say that you may auto resolve the battle or use the battle viewer and the result are the same, which is you may not directly influence the battle directly, Just try some station assaults with a fleet that are fairly matched with both the station and its defenders. With auto resolve the battle will be even in the viewer you defeat them both in detail. The fleet charge out and is destroyed after which you attack the base and destroy it easily. You have

90 Replies 417,354 Views

This is why you view this from the wrong perspective. It is an "adjacency" bonus, not the "level" of the building. If a building is not adjacent to anything that give it an adjacency bonus you don't get it. The number describe the number of adjacency bonuses the building gets. The level of the building is rather the upgrades you build. At least that is how I see it and for me this is quite intuitive... ;)

12 Replies 46,249 Views

yes... I know... the animation of a missile or shot is disconnected from each other. Every shot is basically a hit versus dodge roll and then damage is applied if it is a hit. A ship only fire ONCE per weapon type and do so depending on their cool-down. That is what you see in the log and why you clearly see missile attack results before the missile impact a ship. The animation is just for show, that is true. That does not mean the actual sh

90 Replies 417,354 Views

Sponsoring multiple shipyards would make sense... You can already do this with having a super production world alternate sponsoring several shipyards and queue up productions in them. But it requires that you switch sponsoring them every turn or every few turns at least. Yet one more thing that just add micromanagement to the game that could be better streamlined.

52 Replies 67,194 Views