32bit on an Acer Ferrari 4005. I can duplicate it almost 90% of the time. It will lock up on hibernate. It gets very anoying because when it does you have to turn it completely off and back on. I hibernate 100% of the time when I shut down. Sleep just wasts my battery.
I never said "sleep". I said Hibernate... two totally different things and it's under Vista Ultimate not XP, only in Vista.
My WBVista.exe is ALWAYS running. Even when I don't have WB skinning anything and I've applied Aero. Honestly, it's still a little buggy for me so I have it installed, but not skinning. The damn exe still runs all the time. It's stupid if you ask me. The only way to keep it from running is to just uninstall it.
Still having issues with this on latest 6.01 release.
Still not fixed in WB6.01.
[quote]Bit of both, though I assure you it had nothing to do with your post. [/quote] Shhh, let me live my fantasy. :wink: Thanks for the other fixes in it also.
Meh, noticed that menu bluring works, but some apps don't allow for it.
OK, I noticed that you guys put in a change to have the menu change from All Programs to Back correctly now, but the arrow still doesn't change. Thanks very much for the word changing, but can you also fix the arrow glitch?
cplair, seriously... reading comprehension dude. I only indicated the supposed config of Vista Ultimate with 2GB because seabass also like you at first misunderstood the question. I think he understands now. Basically the question applies to the fact that there's some features that Vista Aero has that WB6 does not. These features were excluded out of WB6 because they interfere with Per Pixel. So, if I can get an answer of "yes" Aero uses Per Pixel then I can then ask if Aero
I can't even get menu trans and blur to work at all. Anyone else exprerience this?
[quote]I will inquire to the devs if they know in the morning. However a quick sweep through support revealed that we really didn't have the answer. Since we didn't make Aero there is little I can tell you. However I invite anyone to assist and I am a little more that curious about the answer should you contact MS on this. [/quote] Thank you. That is exactly the "comprehensive" answer I was looking for. I really appreciate it. Seems as of late you're the only one that when you really
WOW, that's amazing. I ask this one day ago and today 6.01 gets released and all without a single response in this thread by anyone. :rolleyes: :thumbsup: ?
Just wondering.... Do you guys have any French coders on staff? Anyone else notice Colors is spelled as Colours on that screen and in multiple places?
[quote]Seabass you're correct about Vista Home Basic. The other higher end versions (Home Premium, Pro and Ultimate) allows the aero feature, but this is also based on the amount of video memory as well. I believe the minimum system requirement to run Aero is 128 MB video memory along with the amount of system memory (RAM). So you can have 10 gigs of system RAM and Aero still won't work unless you meet the MSR for video memory. I never thought I'd live in a generation where a g
[quote]I think it depends on which version you are running. Because I know on basic it does not and you need at least 512megs of RAM. Unless anyone else knows I would throw that question at Microsoft. [/quote] Come again....? Vista Home Basic doesn't have Aero so obviously the question doesn't apply. Other versions run Aero, but if there is a version difference I'd like to know. Let's say for the sake of the discussion that it's Vista Ultimate with 2GB of RAM.
Does Vista Aero use "Per Pixel" natively?
OK, I know a few things have been fixed (small bugs) in WB6 and that they have been put in the Beta releases in SDC, but when do you guys plan on actually making a release that's not Beta in SDC? I got bit in the past with Beta releases and just choose not to install them, but that shouldn't mean going without fixes for menu corruptions and other things. Do I have to wait until WB6.5 gets released to see a non-beta release in SDC? BTW, how's the minimize/maximize window animation fix
[quote]It is still October here in the states so there[/quote] How did you get the window background transparent like that?
Any idea why it wasn't caught in testing by R&D? Seems something pretty obvious. I know I found it quick and right after I installed WB6. Took everyone else some time to notice it and then start this tread about it.
[quote]Yep So does [ctrl]-c and [ctrl]-v[/quote] Weird. Why would MS limit that except for Ultimate, it's not like it's a major capability. Anyway, Ultimate also has 2 more options for wallpaper display "Fit to screen keeping aspect ratio" and "Fit to screen while cropping" which it appears you don't have. [quote]Do a search in your shared folder for .jpg and .png files. This will list all the wallpapers in all the skins. Delete as needed. [/quote] Yeah, be
Huh, so the long context menu (with delete) is only available in Ultimate? That's a kicker... wonder if this is by design? Zubaz, how about just selecting the wallpaper and hitting del? Does that work on your version?
[quote]Perhaps you should consider returning WindowBlinds. I'd even authorize a full refund so that you would go away.[/quote] You'd like that too much because for you guys that would quiet the person pointing out all the things that should be fixed. All companies like to do business this way, I honestly had more respect for SD until you pointed this out. The hole just got bigger for you with that single statement. Shame. Look, you know what people want from this product.
[quote]So your making noise just to make noise? [/quote] Sort of. I see it more as making the noise so that everyone is aware of the problem. You know, kind of like shining a super big spotlight on it so that there's no misconception that it doens't exist because someone quietly asked and was quietly denied on the claim or the claim was validated, but will just be thrown out later.
[quote]Also BTW, DP now also pulls images from more than one location and, unless it is new to Vista, does not have a "delete wallpaper" function, so I'm not exactly sure what your beef is. [/quote] Actually, that's wrong. In Vista when you go to Desktop Background you can rightclick and get a full menu of options like you could with any other file. You can delete it, cut/paste, send to, whatever. I can't help it if people run XP and think the world is flat. Maybe that's one of the
That's nice, make WB6 dig through all the folders known to man on your HD to look for photos to use as wallpaper and then don't give you the option to delete it in the interface. I thought wallpapers was added in because it gave users BETTER means of managing their wallpapers then display properties in Windows does. Too bad I still use Display Properties to change my wallpapers. Waste of resources to put that in I say....
Stardock Forums
WinCustomize Forums