ericseba

Marriage is about love and you should be allowed to wed whomever you love. Marriage isn't found in nature either, is it? I pulled this from encyclopedia.com: Marriage is

your list reminded me of something i found a couple years ago. it appears to be online and intact still so i'm providing a link. it's a fairly detailed timeline from 1948 to 9/11/01 listing hundreds of what surely seemed at the time unrelated events and decisions...yet taken together it becomes apparent each of them is another pa

24 hour period--a little-undestood autonomic BTW, you mispelled understood.... oh crap, someone get me a damn gun, I'm resorting to liberal tactics of attacking the spelling instead of the issue.

Did you use a thesaurus for that rant or do you really know what all those words mean? I mean Holy crap, I copied and pasted that diatribe into microsoft word and even Bill gates didn't know what the hell you are talking about. I then put it into google and it came back with "did you mean Bush is the anti-Christ and everyone on the right bows before him?" <b

As far as the rights, I am repeating something I've put on a couple of blogs. A gay man has the same equal right as any straight man as regards marriage; he can marry any woman he wants to. Same for a Lesbian, she can marry any man she wants to. What gay men and women want are special rights not equal rights. I said on the Montgomery blog that I work in the Ansley area of Atlanta; a

kingbee: I'll not try to argue with you any longer. The way I see it is very simple. We are two different people. Your a lamb. You walk around with your high ideals and you keep our country as honest and just as the utopia that resides in your head. I am a monster, I am willing to do what it takes, no matter how grotesque, to maintain your ability to reside in your utopia. You see king, it's this simple, I am sure

kingbee: I'll not try to argue with you any longer. The way I see it is very simple. We are two different people. Your a lamb. You walk around with your high ideals and you keep our country as honest and just as the utopia that resides in your head. I am a monster, I am willing to do what it takes, no matter how grotesque, to maintain your ability to reside in your utopia. You see king, it's this simple, I am sure

I posted my feelings about this on another blog. A talk show host here in Atlanta, Neal Boortz, who is a libertarian, said this in response to a gay man who felt he should have "equal" rights as straight people; you have every right in marriage that I do, you can marry any woman you want to, what you are demanding is a "special" right. This sort of sums up my position. If we have to reword laws or rewrite or amend constitutions so that

have I got everyone deep in thought or have I effectively closed this blog/

If you abandon Bush, where do you plan to go? Will you run into Hillary's arms?

I have recently been raked over the coals for my belief that we should not resort to savagery and terrorist tactics in our detention centers. I'm sorry if I made you feel raked over the coals for your beliefs. My real anger was not your beliefs, but the lack of an answer to my question (which you did ev

Hey Tex, thanks for posting this well thought out summary of your positions. After our exchanges on the Amnesty International topics yesterday, I did not think I could be more different than someone and I find out I am very much like you. I also do not necessarily identify with either of the two major parties, I really follow moreso than not, the doctine of the Libertarian party. However, I am a realist and I know that they will never be a significant

To Original Vune: I've read of few of your posts in other blogs this morning. You are obviously a thoughtful young man, much more so than I was at your age. Look, I'm sorry if I have offended you by labeling you a liberal or a bleeding heart. By reading some of your other posts I can understand why you are so against the policies of Bush, yet unwilling to offer up an alternative if you know that you probably don't have the right answers. At le

How can we debate the issues when someone uses the phrase: I don't care about someone else's opinion Vune, let me go back and get my FULL quote which was an exchange with Tex: <TABLE cellpadding=8 width="95%" align=center bgColor=#FFF394 class="mb-Body-Quote-Tabl

See, you seem to be making assumptions there. I'm not actually an American. Also, you seem to point to the problem in your own statement: the policies and the policy makers Ah, Vune and you continue to merely point at problems rather than offering your own solution. <TABLE cellpad

See, you seem to be making assumptions there. I'm not actually an American. Also, you seem to point to the problem in your own statement: the policies and the policy makers Ah, Vune and you continue to merely point at problems rather than offering your own solution.

Americans are not simply hated because they are Americans. Yes it is that simple, you are hated because you are an American. A terrorist would not distinguish you from the actual policy makers who create the policies that they despise so.

Oh I know why we are hated; the Prince of Saudia Arabia who after the 9/11 presented mayor Guiliani with a $10,000,000.00 check and the advice that we should change our policy in Israel. Translation: Stand by while the Arab world finshes what Hitler started, the extermination of every Jew walking the earth. I am a supporter of no religion in particular, I was raised Baptist but I practice nothing now. I have nothing against any religion, even Muslims.

Republicans supporting big business does not send business to China. Business goes to China because all of the businesses there are state run and they don't tax the crap out of themselves. Business (all business, not just big business) in the US are taxed to death making us unable to compete with foreign state run industries. It is not even about labor. I by plastic bags from China for the business I work for. I do it because I have to in order to be c

i'd suggest you look over your shoulder next time you pass a mirror if you think you're any more secure today than you were on september 10, 2001. If you felt safe before 9/11 it was a misguided notion. Here's a quick history lesson of terrorists attacks on US citizens by Muslim radicals PRIOR to 9/11:<

Link Oh I like this, PBS is critizing the government for not acting on warnings about the bombings of the embassies in 1998 as well as the 9/11 attacks. Man the more I read about it, the more I realize how effective this "keeping tabs" stuff is. I mean what does PBS want, should we "preemptively" arrest a terrorist? Where would we hold him? For how long? Sounds kinda Gitmo-i

the best we can hope for is to keep tabs on them now we know who they are. I found a bit of info here from that bastion of conservatism "PBS Frontline". Link According to these guys, we have authorized

easier and safer doesn't come with a guarantee. and it aint free. if i gotta be like our enemies, id rather not be at all. Look kingbee, I make analogies to some of my very conservative friends (and I consider myself to be conservative), that I am against religion in the government for fear of us being

(I will probably be labelled a terrorist) Too late for that title Vune, Tex already gave me that one.