No, in a nut shell, lack of choice. Liberals think that only the government has our best intentions at heart. we are too stupid to make choices for ourselves so some mindless bureaucrat must do it for us. that all good descends from the Government and all bad from individual choices. Again, respectfull
First it was not a violation of the GC, and second, if you read the GC you find that it applies to soldiers in uniform for another country, not spies and terrorists. Well, that's exactly the loophole Team Bush used. I don't know if it's been tested in court. Maybe you do. But the memo trail sh
thats the dictionary defintion of liberal. Wrong. Link Deal with it. but not even close to wh
Reply #45 By: Citizen Moderateman - 2/10/2005 wrote: I see so the simple knowledge denotes guilt Simple knowledge? C'mon dude. You can't be serious. It was a series of memos leading directly to GWB through DOJ and DOD and WH counsel specifically about what torture techniques could be
Reply #46 By: Citizen Dr. Guy wrote: See? You are wrong again! No Law was broken. You are grasping at straws and failing to even catch the hay. But nice non-answer. You are out of them, but then you never had any. Repeat: None so blind as those who do not see. I gave you your answer. Y
Reply #49 By: Citizen Moderateman - 2/10/2005 1:14:15 PM wrote: well then I will have to withdraw my support of a womans right to choose, gun control, stemcell research, conservation and other issues, but if it makes you happy I will be glad to do so... NOT!!!!!!!!!! If those are really y
BTW, why are you so afraid of the liberal label? You are not a progresive. A progressive is open to new ideas and new ways to do things. Well, that's a fair statement, but it's not accurate. Here's the American Heritage® Dictionary definition of progressive: 1 - Moving forward; advancing. <
wow you are amazing , you sure have pegged me right. Hey thanks! I guess I will just have to follow YOUR example of fair and balanced then huh? maybe switch parties? bec
Reply #39 By: Citizen Dr. Guy - 2/10/2005 12:55:10 PM: Game over. The loser cannot use logic, so now he resorts to name calling. Way to go Mao. Um, you called me 'left of Mao'. So I guess, as the first act of name calling, would be 'game over' by your definition.
Reply #38 By: Citizen Dr. Guy - 2/10/2005 12:54:02 PM wrote: So, if you lose sleep that is torture? I think you just topedoed your whole arguement, but then I knew you did not have one. Fly away Mao. Go do your own homework. Read Geneva. That's the law that was broken. Deal with it.<
as usual you do NOT answere docs question, you supply many things here..NOT ONE OF THEM SANCTIONED by MY President. typical evasion and deflecting of rational questions, which is the forte of left leaning lemonhead losers. So Alberto justifies torture in a memo to GWB, Geneva is declared obsolete, & tor
Reply #31 By: Citizen Dr. Guy - 2/10/2005 12:33:55 PM wrote: On earth, unless you look like Uranus. Sorry dude. I already used the Uranus joke. And if you think I'm to the left of Mao, you're even dumber than you sound.
Reply #33 By: Citizen Moderateman - 2/10/2005 12:38:12 PM wrote: Exactly what kind am I? The kind that puts party ahead of facts, logic or country.
Reply #18 By: Citizen Dr. Guy - 2/10/2005 7:29:17 AM wrote: Can you elaborate and provice documentation on what his torture policy is? Sure Mr StallingTactic. Knock yourself out: One Justice Department memo, written for the CI
Reply #21 By: Citizen Moderateman - 2/10/2005 11:23:20 AM wrote: i HAVE A VALID REASON TO intensly dislike hanoijohn Uh huh. He dared to run against GWB. That's reason enough for your kind. http://www.goingupriver.com/
Reply #17 By: Citizen Dr. Guy - 2/10/2005 7:27:55 AM wrote: That would put you left of Mao Tse Dung! On what planet? Oxycontinia? Uranus? !
Reply #68 By: Citizen Juxtaposition - 2/10/2005 1:12:46 AM Still waiting to see if it was wrong for American soldiers to kill Nazis and Japanese soldiers in World War II. According to what? The teachings of Christ or the teachings of Wolfowitz? <img src="../images/smiles/lol.gif" border=0 ALIGN="abs
Reply #13 By: thatoneguyinslc - 2/10/2005 12:01:19 AM wrote: Pelosi as a mod......I just don't see it! Compared to war for peace, torture for democracy & debt for solvency? !! Yes, moderate. Absolutely. <img src="../images/smil
Matthew 5:38 is followed up by Matthew 5:39 where Jesus says "But I say, don't resist an evil person! If you are slapped on the right cheek, turn the other too! If you are ordered to court and your shirt is taken, give your coat, too. If a soldier demands that you carry his gear for a mile, carry it two miles, Give to those who a
Hey 'moderate,' guess what? An ad hominem attack is not the same thing as fact. More like hate masquerading as an opinion. And terms like "hanoijohn" and 'spew lies" contain no venom? ! You're only foolin' yourself. Face it: Today's so-called conservatives are radicals. People like Nancy Pelosi are moderate by comparison.