Loyal citizens don't seceed from a country --Ehh, it depends on what you view as loyal, theres loyal to the gov't, and there is loyal to the country , the people, example; a gov't is taking rights away from a state, wouldn't that state have the right,knowing that it will end up without rights, se
Not entirely true. War was not declared when they seceded. The Union adopted a somewhat conciliatory attitude toward the Confederacy until they attacked and captured Fort Sumter. I'm so historically nit-picky --Not officially, though tons of northerners wanted to go south and kick the "pants" off off th
We are all the same. I CALL BS!!! We are not all the same....geez, i can't stand it when people believe that....are we all white, do we all speak english, or french....hmmm? B'ah
WTF do i bother..................
Republican Canidates in the Future: --McCain (maybe run as Democrat) --Schwarzenegger (if laws are changed around, would be kinda be cool as Prez., though would be hell for the "girly-men" out there... ) ...can't think of any else... BTW, have you noticed that the repubs/demi's rotate,or at least hav in the last few elections....
I'm thoroughly convinced you're as dumb as an ignorant stump --Stumps can be ignorant....how-- oh, well yeah maybe, i can think of my sisters ex-husband, he is somewhat like a stump....i guess." J/K "Political debating, at its mos
I have been a Republican since 1962 Good for you... *shakes his head and mumbles* "Damn it, why do i always have to handle the clean up." "Ok, Dr. Miller,you go to this corner, Dr. Guy, you take that corner, and COL, yo
-- babbling buddhist, breathing bubbles of breathtaking beauty balancing by the boardwalk. lol glad my won dum phuc made ya smile. --What a bunch of B'S Yep, I would be the babbling buddhist BTW (incase none of ya noticed) yeah, it made me LMAO...kinda like the naked gun series....
How about the AMERICAN PATRIOT PARTY :p;p It looks like
COL--Think about it, cut money now,take the money saved and apply it to future benefits...hmmm? Just an idea...
COL--Think about it, cut money now,take the money saved and apply it to future benefits...hmmm? Just an idea...
Good grief, another babbling, incoherent Christian...as if we need another around here. --How about an incoherent, babbling Buddhist........we do need lots 'o' them...... <TABLE cellpadding=8 width="95%" align=center bgColor=#FFF
Now if the problem is the inability of Social Sceurity to continue paying the full benefits, how does the Bush cutting benefits 30% fix a 25% cut if we do NOTHING? --Perhaps, the money saved from cutting benefits now, will go to the benefits then (probably not, it'll just line the poloticians pockets) <
Reply #37 By: Dr Cynical - 5/17/2005 7:32:04 PM --be afraid, VERY afraid.... J/K (lets hope Myrr, or certain others don't notice the comment above)
ironically, i gave this test to my mom and sister to take, apparently they ended up as followed: Sisteer: 50-50 , Mother-Con:10,Lib:90 --The ironic part is that my mom was raised in a very strict and conservative family, military family, and she turns out, according to this test, to be this way...
It is the opinion of these experts who have looked at the proposals and have concluded that what Bush is suggesting does not fix Social Security. --you have this and yet you argue this: <TD class="mb-
The air base in my hometown,kingsley airfield/base (klamath falls) is one of only two f-15 trainin bases in the US, the other one is back east, also, underneath it are nuke cilos, and there still are about 6-8 nuke capable missles in them, also it is 1 of 3 main bases on the west coast, also, it is the (when the president is this side of the rockies) 3rd in line to house the president and his plane if the other 2 are hit.... <img src="../images/smiles/
Dr.Miller, Col G, why don't you both go your seperate ways and fantascise in both of your ignorances....
Reply #14 By: Citizen drmiler - 5/16/2005 5:37:05 PM Bush is the one who said the problem with the social security is its inability to pay that benefits promised to future retirees. If the problem its inability to pay the promised benefits then Bush suggests cuts as a solution to the problem Bush identified in the first p
uh-oh, just waiting for dabe..... *hunkers-down and ties himself to a tree* J/K Dabe...
'X' ..............? Is that like wearing a target on your head, so those ''black helicopters'' can find you....... BLACK HELICOPTERS! AH! RUN!
cut benefits --you say bush is suggesting this, and yet you bash it, but then you say: Reply #10 By: COL Gene - 5/16/2005 4:59:43 PM The choice is simple. We
Reply #7 By: Citizen Moderateman - 5/16/2005 4:03:41 PM --Mod, your actually being Mod..... J/K --1] i doubt any one wants to pay more taxes..... --2]
Damn, Eugene Oregon....(Living in) (GO DUCKS!) Fron: Klamath Falls Oregon....(GO PELICANS!) (the last year i was their, our football team went 6-3 as independants(being formerly in 4A-Southern Oregon Conference,and the lowest in enrollment in the conf. at 945 students {Closest to us were at 1200}) Although i did find out that Oregon,
according to Bush the problem with Social Security is it can not pay the promised benefits beyond 2042. --According to bush, the democrats and congress have said this....unbeleiveable..... <TD class="