Wingman412

For those of you wanting to address the accusations of Mikey the Madman, I got this article from Slate.com which I hear is a left leaning reporting agency. It addresses his accusations point by point and refutes them all. For some REAL bi-partisan refuting of Moore's points, see the 9/11 Commission Report. It is really excellent. (by the way, why was Moore seated with Pres. Jimmy Carter at the DNC? You cannot dissasociate Moore from the campaign w

Well. I suppose that might be true. (I guess I should to be glad that I am not a master of super laxitives. ) Didn't mean to get all convoluted on ya. The point was Nanny-State=Bad

No. I run a non-profit organization that takes ZERO government money despite the fact that billions are available. I have had my share of hard times and never considered taking a gov't handout. There should be no such thing. Anyway, it is not about what a person would rather have. If convicted of a crime, wouldn't you rather serve your sentence in society than in jail? Frankly, neither situaion is anyone elses pro

I know you bushies have trouble reading words more than 2 syllables Nice. Your "ilk" shouldn't be running anything more important than a fast food kitchen with attitudes like that. Intelligent debate? Not possible. You are unarmed.

Wingman and his conservative ilk were screaming about this website the other week when bush was ahead by 88 or more votes That is a lie. I don't know about ilk but you cannot point to anyplace where I cite this or any 1 poll and scream about anything. Just as I state in my post above, you look at a bu

Well I listened for about 25 minutes and I must say: While he is an extremist and I cannot back all of what he says - his opinions are pretty out there - some of it I do agree with. Mainly: it is darn entertaining. He's a bit emotional (not surprised that he is an ex-hippie, as am I). I just have to admit. I was very entertained. I'll probably listen again. I can see why some hate him and why kooks worship him. I fall into neither camp. I jus

Bush or Kerry? Bush has a lot riding on our quick removal from Iraq. And by extension all Republicans do. Kerry is in no hurry since it can always be called "Bush's mess" and not Kerrys fault. Also, if he leaves too soon and the place falls apart - it will have been his fault for being too eager about withdrawing. The French have said they aren't going in there no matter who is President. Both Bush and Kerry want UN su

Strange I just checked the following news websites: CNN CBS MSNBC ABC FOX Are not covering this ground breaking news </T

I sometimes wonder if Kerry realizes that cameras are rolling and mics are on when he speaks? He knows it. He is trusting in the ignorance of the masses. He trusts that sound bytes matter and track records don't. He trusts in an emotionally charged voter motivated and blinded by irrational hatred of

Despite the lack of spacing or punctuation, I made my way through this piece (mostly because I usuallu get a laugh out of Sandy2). I was pleasantly surprised to find that some of the ramblings made good sense. If you have a career and the career moves to India - go with it. If you have a job and it goes to an immigrant, then go get some more marketable skills. A persons poor choice in

Very interesting. Thanks for bringing this to my attention. I have now discovered that part of M. Savage's show overlaps my afternoon drive home. I'll be tuning in to check it out. Thanks again

The entire premise is wrong here. Want to speculate on why we have military in Germany, or, Columbia, or Serbia, or Japan, or S. Korea, or the Philipines, or Guam, or Haiti, or heck... a bunch of places. Oil is a red herring. Do you realize that the US ships more petrol to Iraq than comes out of it right now? Neither do we "take" oil from them. It belongs to Iraq. They sell it on an open market. We buy some of it. A tiny drop ac

prove it. . . Note also - if all of Kerry's votes for taxes on gas had passed prices would already be doubled. But even then they would still be about 50% less than what the British pay per gallon. And then it would finally approach what you pay for bottled water.

Reply #28 By: Citizen sandy2 - 9/21/2004 4:26:48 PM I am aware of that. But if we didn't need middle eastern oil to keep our prices down then we could say screw you saudi arabia, good bye Iraq and pull out of the middle east entirley. We don't. Pric

John Kerry addressing congress before Iraq 2: "We must recognize that there is no indication that Saddam Hussein has any intention of relenting. So we have an obligation of enormous consequence, an obligation to guarantee that Saddam Hussein cannot ignore the United Nations. He cannot be permitted to go unobserved and unimpeded toward his horrific objective of amassing a stockpile of weapons of mass destruction. This is not a matter about which th

It is all well and good to complain the we leave this history alone but you need to make that complaint to Senator-in-absentia Kerry. He is the one who campaigned on Viet Nam for months and featured it in his convention. He doesn't give us much else to discuss. If he does not want Viet Nam discussed, then he should stop bringing it up. But OBVIOUSLY he wants it discussed. That's your guy. A real genius.

You know what the best kind of apples are? The orange ones!

There's a vast difference between the Robin Hood motive and plain old pilfering A rose by any other name... When the government does it over many many years, it changes society and morally bankrupts the citizenry who learn to shirk the responsibility of caring for their neighbors. Which is exa

I bet you're a big fan of Jane Fonda too eh?

"amug" ???????

Well it looks like Senator-in-absentia Kerry has the answer to all of this defense bickering. We'll just turn it all over to the UN. Then all of this will be moot.

From the Wall Street Journal Op/Ed page today: The Rather story looks more and more like a partisan dirty trick. Tuesday, September 21, 2004 12:01 a.m. EDT The big news in yesterday's mea culpa by CBS News isn't that the network was "misled" about "documents whose authenticity is in doubt," as it was finally forced to concede. The story is the admission that the source Dan Rather trusted with CBS's reputation was non

What DOES he want to do there? All I have heard is that he wants to get the US out in 6 months and put other nations in. Would someone please detail or link the Kerry recipee for how to handle Iraq '05-'08?

Aye, even the truth smells like crap. I partially agree. It sure smells like crap but the kind of twisting logic going on there is not remotely what most thinking people would call Truth.

He is giving the same support to the anti-vote Iraqi regimes today as he gave to the North Vietnamesse 30 years ago. It emboldens the enemy to see our in-fighting and gives them comfort. So the original idea is sound. Does anyone think that the terrorists would vote for Bush? No. They favor Kerry - so causing more deaths in Iraq is the main way they have to influence the voters. So our thread title: "John Kerry is encouraging the death