They were "with us" in support if not physically there. Just because I say "with us" does not mean combat wise. Support is the key term here Sorry but I am requiring evidence on this one that says specfically that Russia or Germany 'supported us' during Desert Storm. I can buy into the idea that German
It is important to address the protection of our borders (not granting illegal aliens amnesty), rethink our immigration policy, and protect infrastructure vulnerabilities, not place our already thin line of troops smack dab in the middle of the holy land fundamentalists will rush to die
PLUS France, Germany, Russia, they were ALL with us in Desert Storm. Germany and Russia were not members of the first coalition in Desert Storm, got something loose in the connection Gunner? <a href="
- GX
No Bremer reported to Bush and it was Bush to whom he went for more troops. Since General Franks wanted several hundred thousand when he planned the war, it does not seem there is a disagrement between Franks and Bremer. The problem has been and is President Bush! Bush likes that saying: Rule 1. The Boss is always right. Rule 2.
GX: that's hilarious. Mrs. blogic constantly makes John Edward / Edwards jokes, due to too much daytime television watching during a vacation in 2002. Thank you, but alas I cannot take credit for the picture it comes from about.com's political humor section, who did the picture, not quite sure, but I ta
I figured you would be here stating what you thought about the debate first. The wrong election and wrong party to back. Sorry to say! I don't think you mean me, but since your reply is beneath mine and figure it must be me, well here is my rebuttal. 1. I am voting Badnarik, 100% 2. I lik
In response to #21. Clinton is a genius, Bush is not. Clinton accomplished a lot on his own, Bush did not. Rove enlisted Bush whereas Clinton enlisted Carville. As to how long Clinton and Carville have worked together I have no idea. Do you? Surely you jest, if Clinton was a genius than the Monica Scand
For those who have some sense of humor about these things: Cheney suggested that people go to FactCheck.com. Oops. An John Edwards suggested this picture be used as an ad
Evidence? Bush's mind is average (even if you think he is intelligent he is still nowhere near Rove) whereas Rove is a genius. Who do you think is going to be calling the shots in that type of relationship? By all means don't take my word for
You left out a few salient points in your response Grim, please try again. Evade and Equate that is the SOP for Democrats and Republicans, thanks for reconfirming it for the Democrats. Instead of actually talking about, good show Abe your ability
Fine then, don't believe the online polls, look at one of the networks via the link above. I said your posted poll from CBS was good and more believeable than an online version. Or did you miss the following?: <TABLE cellpadding=8 width="95%" align=center bgColor=#FFF394 class="mb-Bod
Ok, so what your saying is that 400,000 people spent 30 minutes of their lives running out to 6 different polling sites and stuffed the ballot boxes, all on the democratic side. While the Republicans didn't have ANYONE? Does that really sound realistic to you? FR Crowd just was getting started up, while
Now that is a better poll, since it has not been corrupted or tainted by the FR or DU crowd. - GX
Are you kidding I got my weapons from the future nice awesome laser rifles! - GX Dinosaur Hunter Extraordinaire 'I kill'em there biggins deader than roadkill!'
Free Republic = Republican Partisans Democratic Underground = Democrat Partisans What else is there to explain, what is so hard to understand? - GX
Last time we had a debate on this DU gets 3 million hits, where FR gets about a million or equal to that, so you tell me there is no 400,000 members or bots working to influence them, come on seriously are we that dense? Do we just rule out the political partisan hackers? I bet you saw polls last Thursday saying Bush was winning but that was not the case Kerry won, but now it's reversed you will defend the same polls who have been clearly ef
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=974046&mesg_id=974046 [LINK] Check this out and tell me the polls are not influenced by Political Partisans. - GX
What am I talking about just visit Free Republic or Democratic Underground, both are openly flooding those polls or do you not see them as an influence on those polls? - GX
Okay. - GX
CrispE turns out the two extreme communities were screwing around with those polls (those two being FR and DU) so those polls are not accurate in the least. - GX INGSOC Employee of the Month Hooray!
Riddle me this: Edwards was talking about Tax Cuts while his partner Kerry was talking about Tax Raises, what is up with that is it a Tax Cut, Tax Raise, or Tax Cut Raise? - GX INGSOC Employee of the Month
Turns out the Navy Times (going to be in the Oct 11 Edition) also did a poll on the Navy: Bush 72%, Kerry 17% Unless they are the same poll for the entire military or was it Branch Oriented? - GX INGSOC Employee of the Month Hooray!
Well dear Abe by your hypothesis, Bill Clinton was the puppet of James Carville according to your basis for your hypothesis, that if a President is of average intelligence and their Campaigner is of above average intelligence, the President is a puppet of the Campaigner, right? - GX INGSOC Employee of the Month HOORAY!
If Edwards had beaten Cheney you two would be hammering home that fact but now that it turned the other way you are quick to say it was a draw what is the deal with that? Edward's first debate excuse is bull, after all he did debate when they had all the Democrats debate during the Democratic Primary, or does that not count? - GX