_BUSHADVANTAGE (doesn't do anything anyway) _CHARISMA 3 _COMELINESS 4 _COMPASSION 7 _COMPETENCE 9 _CREDIBILITY 9 _DEMOCRATLOYALTY 9 _EXPERIENCE 7 _INDIEAPPEAL 8 _INTEGRITY 3 _INTELLIGENCE 10 _JUDGEMENT 9
I think everyone is ignoring the real winner of this election. http://www.thespoof.com/news/spoof.cfm?headline=s2i6896
As of now, it is the only poll, and the only one you really need since it's unbiased. If you want a poll that always shows Republicans winning every state except DC, they might add AOL polls to it too, or FOX polls which will only add 5 points to the Republican side.
Badnarik take the strentghs of both major partys, and is actually fiscally resposible. Domestic policys of Republicans, Social policys of Democrats, the exact opposite of the Communists. Dems have been way more fiscally responsible in history, so I don't have the faintest idea why Republicans claim they are. It's too bad this isn't a three party system, as Libertarians would be the most legitimate 3rd party...
Judging by what the NON ai Bush and Kerry are focusing on, it would seem like Florida would be the biggest swing state right now... since Iowa(7) + Ohio(20) = Florida(27). Why is Florida considered an easy Bush win here?
He hasn't cheated, he just changed his position on human cloning.
You cheat, just like the enemy does. Usually editting a the character you like to have 3 more stamina and 2x more money to start with makes it even.
Forget Cobb... Badnarik is the best 3rd party guy out there. After all, Naders split from the greens in looking like Perots split from Reform, both of tehm were hurt in the polls. We could still switch votes... though there's not much point in it...
Since Hitler supported killing off all non-christians, including aetheists, and especially Jews, wouldn't that make his religious score really high, not low? Or is is low because the religious think he's going too far and refuse to support that?
electoral-vote is only non-partisan because they don't use their own polls, they use others, so when a Republican siding poll is most recent, it would appear Bush is winning. Tha New Jersey tie is only predicted to be even by one poll, that's not even a swing state, but it was the most recent. Unless all of teh most recent polls on that site are from Zogby, or another non-partisan pollster, it's not always accurate. bush-263 kerry-248 sounds about righ
If part of his objective was to create another way to divide our country on an event, he's doing a very good job. How long will it take for the political spinsters to create media chaos on this one? I guess we'll be hearing more "Bush failed to catch bin Laden" and "Terrorists support Kerry" propaganda... : /
It may be difficult for some to objectively take a side on outsourcing of jobs, but I like to use this example to explain both sides. I'm going to leave it vague intentionally... Let's say there were an item that you needed, and there were two versions that you can buy... Choice A costs $2 and Choice B costs $15, but they both do exactly the same thing, but A was exported, and B was local. At this point, are you more likely to take the bar
From my point of view, it looks like Bush and Kerry are both focused too much on themselves on November 2nd rather than other subjects that are rarely addressed. I could be wrong, but from what I've seen, it just appears that way. I live in Florida (most electoral votes of the swing states...), so I've heard most of the meaningless insults, but no solutions. The deficit... well, if we still had a surplus I'd say more of the same would be a ve
As one of those few truly centrist minded here, I've been wondering, since everyone on one side of the political spectrum assumes the media is on the other side, if I could get an honest answer on what a good example of a true objective source or political news would be. All too often I ask for an unbiased news source, and I get an answer that shows one of the candi
Most of you, and a majority of all people, either favor liberal or conservative ways, and tend to think that the way they favor is the best. However, looking back on history, neither an extreme liberal or extreme conservative government will function properly, while governments closer to the center generally do very well. The same applies for individual issues (I'll be comparing liberal vs. conservative, NOT Democrat vs. Republican,