DEMOCRATIC DIMWITS DELIGHT IN DISRESPECT

I am glad I did not watch the SOTU speech.  I probably would have thrown something through the TV.

Now I know some liberal is going to jump up and relate an anecdote about Clinton and how it was turn about and fair play.  Funny, I dont ever remember such show of disrespect for Clinton.  Indeed, even after Clinton sullied himself, the other side still seeemed to give the office a lot of rspect.  But hey, that was just me I guess.

Virulent vomiting vitriol

Reply By: Dr. GuyPosted: Wednesday, February 01, 2006I am glad I did not watch the SOTU speech. I probably would have thrown something through the TV.

I came close to flinging a glass full of juice at Tv doc. colleen was watching and said those magic words.. "elie? breathe"

"I came close to flinging a glass full of juice at Tv doc."

You sad bastard!

#4 by pigsback.com (Anonymous user) Wednesday, February 01, 2006

I came close to flinging a glass full of juice at Tv doc." You sad bastard!

I know who my mom and dad are, bitch! do you?

"I know who my mom and dad are, bitch! do you?"

My parents are dead. What's that got to do with anything anyway?

6 by pigsback.com (Anonymous user) Wednesday, February 01, 2006

My parents are dead. What's that got to do with anything anyway?

so watching you born was too much for them? they just keeled over and died at the sight of your ugly face.

I don't loose my temper. However, after last evening public antics, just the thought of H.Clinton and her ill-mannered and morally bankrupt playmates leading our great nation is enough motivation for me to up the party donation ante.

#8 by TitanI9 Wednesday, February 01, 2006

don't loose my temper. However, after last evening public antics, just the thought of H.Clinton and her ill-mannered and morally bankrupt playmates leading our great nation is enough motivation for me to up the party donation ante.

I was just very upset to see such blatant disrespect in a public forum. I am glad the right does not behave in such a manner.

Hi MM, you and I seemed to be on the same wavelength on this one, as I wrote up an article discussing the same thing last nite after watching the SOTU and seeing the news following.

The Democrats should be lambasted over their behavior, as it was completely and totally disgusting. They are sticking future generations with the bankrupt and bereft of any real social benefit so called social security system. They refuse to fix it because it's one of their greatest accomplishments. They pulled the ultimate bait and switch when they let FDR stick the public with that system, and now they don't want to fix it and don't want to allow anyone else to fix it.

They should be tried as the treasonous bastards that they are, for robbing everyone of their wealth and their own future wealth. Perhaps some slick lawyer will one day figure out a way to sue the congress over it's mismanagement of the social security system, and maybe, just maybe, they will be the catalyst to spur real reform of the broken system. Or at least I can hope so.

#10 by terpfan1980 Wednesday, February 01, 2006

Hi MM, you and I seemed to be on the same wavelength on this one

not that unusual for us to agree.

The Democrats should be lambasted over their behavior, as it was completely and totally disgusting. They are sticking future generations with the bankrupt and bereft of any real social benefit so called social security system. They refuse to fix it because it's one of their greatest accomplishments. They pulled the ultimate bait and switch when they let FDR stick the public with that system, and now they don't want to fix it and don't want to allow anyone else to fix it.

what continues to amaze me is the democrats stance S.S. is just fine and needs no help.

what continues to amaze me is the democrats stance S.S. is just fine and needs no help.

In a few years they'll be saying it's an emergency and must be fixed, and that they've been saying it for 20 years (since the first Clinton administration if not before).

I hope folks will remind the public that they were the stone-wallers that stopped any fix now before the problem really became an emergency, but I am not counting on that happening.

Usually when an official puts a family member in charge of an important government effort people scream nepotism. Oddly, when Clinton gave his wife the job of reform, someone with no political power at all and no business doing anything but having teas for dignitaries, no one said much.

Now, they even forget that she was in charge of the mess that she is trying to keep other people from cleaning up. I guess I'd be bitter too if I had been put in charge of reforming something that ended up so entirely messed up. I think the press should really look harder at Hillary's sour grapes.

12 by terpfan1980 Wednesday, February 01, 2006

In a few years they'll be saying it's an emergency and must be fixed, and that they've been saying it for 20 years (since the first Clinton administration if not before). I hope folks will remind the public that they were the stone-wallers that stopped any fix now before the problem really became an emergency, but I am not counting on that happening.

Lets hope the right side of the aisle agrees to fix things then instead of reminding the left there is no problem.

13 by BakerStreet Wednesday, February 01, 2006

Usually when an official puts a family member in charge of an important government effort people scream nepotism. Oddly, when Clinton gave his wife the job of reform, someone with no political power at all and no business doing anything but having teas for dignitaries, no one said much.

Not so odd baker, it's only bad when the right does it according to left thinking.When the left regains power {and sadly they will one day} one can only hope that the lessons of 2000 through 2008 are not lost on the sitting republicans.

Meh, if Hillary wins she'll probably slap a helmet on Chelsea and put her in charge of the war in Iraq.

#16 by BakerStreet Wednesday, February 01, 2006

Meh, if Hillary wins she'll probably slap a helmet on Chelsea and put her in charge of the war in Iraq.

babs streisand, sec.def. Fatboy moore; centcom general in charge.

bill clinton sec state. chelsea clinton sec, sex-ed. heh

The losers last night were that American People. Bush gave answers to major issues that are not solutions. Answers to energy that are decades off. Health care options that people who need then can not afford. Support for making his tax cuts permanent and insuring this country will never have a balanced budget. His speech was to and for his base-- the Haves and the Have Mores. It provided nothing for the majority and ignores the needs of the American family. He talked about the need for education while he is cutting the funding for student loans and has under funded his No Child Left Behind Act by over $20 Billion dollars since that law was passed. He says we NEED to protect our borders and refuses to include the money needed to hire the border guards. Without these added guards the talk about providing border security is JUST TALK. He said American worker will be competitive on the world stage but fails to propose a single way that will happen. There was no talk about how the increase in the National debt will impact the future and NO way will he meet his commitment to reduce the deficit in half by 2009. The deficit projection for 2006 is about $ 600 Billion not counting the Social Security and Medicare Surplus. He talked about the impact of the baby boomers on Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid but the only suggestion would have made Social Security more in debt by diverting younger workers taxes from meeting the baby boomer retirement payments. He added $60 Billion per year to the demands on Medicare with NO FUNDING. He has cut Medicaid funding at the Federal level and placed the added burden on the states. He has failed to address the most basic needs of the Gulf rebuilding including making the levies comparable of withstanding a Cat. 5 storm. He offers low interest loans to people that lost everything for rebuilding their homes. HOW are these people to repay these loans? HOW DID BUSH say ANTYTHING that will help solve our problems?

If this is his LEADERSHIP, we need a NEW LEADER! His leadership does not warrent respect!

I didn't watch it (was busy watching cartoons).

But...

Hi, Moderateman! Hehe.

19 by Texas Wahine Wednesday, February 01, 2006

I didn't watch it (was busy watching cartoons). But... Hi, Moderateman! Hehe.

hi sweety pie lady.. xoxox

we need a NEW LEADER

here we agree gene, but the truth is we have George Bush for another 3 years.

we need a NEW LEADER

Someone needs new material. I guess old colonels are worse than no colonels.

#22 by Dr. Guy Wednesday, February 01, 2006

I guess old colonels are worse than no colonels

I think he is pissy all the time because he never got that first star.

I would rather be led by the ayatollahs of Iran, at least with them you know where you stand. I tust you don't really believe this; otherwise, you are being "blatantly disrepect"[ful.

Oddly, when Clinton gave his wife the job of reform, someone with no political power at all and no business doing anything but having teas for dignitaries, no one said much.

C'mon, Baker, all hell broke loose when she proposed universal health care.