How can you be so dense?

from JoeUser Forums
All of us here at JU have tried, but you still don't seem to get it no matter what we do. Col I was not coming outright and saying that your post was false. What I "was" saying is that I'm not going to bother trying to prove or disprove it. No matter what "proof" we give you to the contrary, you either ignore it or dismiss it. It's just not worth the hassle to me.


No, we just don't feel like falling for the sheer stupidity of this. The problem with you is this. No matter how much proof is given to you to disprove your position, even if the source is unimpeachable....you will either ignore the proof or dismiss it out of hand. So have at it clueless one. You'll get no more points from me on this except the 5 your getting from this.
End of quote
politics
11,718 views 26 replies
Reply #1 from JoeUser Forums Top
bump for the cluess old liberal.
Reply #2 from JoeUser Forums Top

Doc, I long ago stopped replying to him.  I even replied to Dabe!  At least she had some variance!  I think he is just a bot.  Cause his message never changes!

Merry Christmas!

Galactic Civilizations III
Reply #3 from JoeUser Forums Top
Give it a break guys. This from a solid athiest, respect the day and cease hostilities. You've got 364 more where you can continue berating the man.

Have a good holiday. Best wishes in the new year.
Reply #4 from JoeUser Forums Top

Moderator hat on:

DO NOT post this kind of thing to the forums.

Reply #5 from JoeUser Forums Top
Moderator hat on:
DO NOT post this kind of thing to the forums.


Why not? The second paragraph is a reply from one of the col's threads. The first paragraph is what actually started this thread. Link Please check reply #5. I will do as you ask but I really would like to understand why you are asking it.
Reply #6 from JoeUser Forums Top
All I can say is that I /salute Dr.Miler for taking the position of ignoring, or at least not directly replying in, the Clueless Old Liberal's threads.

As Little Whip and others have said, let his threads die of the loneliness they deserve.

If you really feel compelled to reply to whatever his latest rant is, start a new article and argue the issues there. Earn the points for yourself and let him keep going on the point deficit trail as everyone with an ounce of sense just uses their daily "trolling" votes on his crap.
Reply #7 from JoeUser Forums Top
All I can say is that I /salute Dr.Miler for taking the position of ignoring, or at least not directly replying in, the Clueless Old Liberal's threads.

As Little Whip and others have said, let his threads die of the loneliness they deserve.

If you really feel compelled to reply to whatever his latest rant is, start a new article and argue the issues there. Earn the points for yourself and let him keep going on the point deficit trail as everyone with an ounce of sense just uses their daily "trolling" votes on his crap.


Thank you sir. Now if I can just get an answer from Brad, I'll be doing good.
Reply #8 from JoeUser Forums Top
I done went and did it yet again. Gotta watch that. Posting on a clueless thread is just that! Clueless!
Reply #9 from JoeUser Forums Top

done went and did it yet again. Gotta watch that. Posting on a clueless thread is just that! Clueless!

I posted on one of his, only because someone else referenced the article.  So I just posted one thing. Pfft!  Have the 5 points Col Klink!

Reply #10 from JoeUser Forums Top
I really wonder just how much of an idiot someone can be. Info is given to refute a given point! The info is more or less irrefutable. And yet the info is ignored and they just go right back to their original talking point which was proven false! Kind of makes me wonder. I'm sure we all know who I'm talking aboout don't we? I keep watching it happen time and time again. We "all" need to stop feeding the idiotic troll!
Reply #11 from JoeUser Forums Top
We "all" need to stop feeding the idiotic troll!

I am a bad culprit of that, especially the last few days. But his rants have such paper thin arguments, not based in fact... and then he just doesn't get it...

I foreswore myself publicly from responding once... but I could not turn away.

Then he started coming to my articles and posting there... drawing me back...

I need a clean break from COL Curmudgeon.

HI, I'M SINGRDAVE, AND I'M A COL-A-HOLIC.

HI, DAVE.
Reply #12 from JoeUser Forums Top
And he cannot spell to save his life.
Reply #13 from JoeUser Forums Top
And he cannot spell to save his life.


TOO TRUE! But he is supposed to be an ex-army officer? I seriously doubt that. Either that or his mind is gone!

Hmmmmmm that "would" explain a lot of things, wouldn't it?
Reply #14 from JoeUser Forums Top

HI, I'M SINGRDAVE, AND I'M A COL-A-HOLIC.

HI, DAVE.

Hi Dave!  I am a recovering Col-a-holic!  Just remember the mantra of the club "The world is not a Bush Oyster".

Reply #15 from JoeUser Forums Top
But he is supposed to be an ex-army officer? I seriously doubt that. Either that or his mind is gone!

Supposed to be? Any time anyone calls him on it, he regales them with his 30+ years as an Army Reserve officer and that he has an MBA from Lehigh University. He probably had a secretary do his spelling for him. And since he started writing books, he must have gone through four copy editors...

The world is not a Bush oyster... the world is not a Bush oyster...
Reply #16 from JoeUser Forums Top
I tried once to stop replying to him. I have better chances of stopping from drinking so much Coca-Cola. I even tried to understand him and make him understand why we believe the opposite of almost everything he says, but it was a waste of time. He is not here to debate, only to put his point accross and no one elses matters. Gotta wonder how he hates Bush so much for acting like King as he says yet his words are almighty and no one elses matters. It takes an idiot to recognize an idiot I guess.
Reply #17 from JoeUser Forums Top
He is not here to debate, only to put his point accross and no one elses matters.

I think that is the most irritating thing about his threads. He's not here to learn or to be open minded. Is he desperately looking for validation?

He has said he's putting together another book... Maybe he's vetting new talking points and using us as sounding boards?
Reply #19 from JoeUser Forums Top
He has said he's putting together another book... Maybe he's vetting new talking points and using us as sounding boards?


You said it right, putting together. He can not spell if his life depended on it so someone else must be writing it for him.

It is possible that he will use alot of our answers to prove what ever points he will try to prove. Here's an interesting thing though, I bet that, if he makes any sales, that he will not make one single decent donation to any charity that helps poor people, you know the ones he's always crying about.
Reply #20 from JoeUser Forums Top
Thought this wasn't meant to be posted to the forums?!?


And why would that be? We are not making a joke of him nor are we calling him names, bad or otherwise. As I read it we are not breaking TOU in any fashion.
Reply #21 from JoeUser Forums Top
And why would that be?


Uh, cause back in comment #6, Draginol told you to remove it from the forums...
Reply #22 from JoeUser Forums Top
And why would that be?


Uh, cause back in comment #6, Draginol told you to remove it from the forums...


And ummmmmm he "never" bothered to reply as to why I was supposed to. And like I said before, there is nothing in this that violates the TOU.
Reply #23 from JoeUser Forums Top
And ummmmmm he "never" bothered to reply as to why I was supposed to


I think "cause he said so" is a good enough reason, I mean, it is his site afterall. Do you really think that "how can you be so dense" is not calling someone a name?
Reply #24 from JoeUser Forums Top
And ummmmmm he "never" bothered to reply as to why I was supposed to


I think "cause he said so" is a good enough reason, I mean, it is his site afterall. Do you really think that "how can you be so dense" is not calling someone a name?


Excuse me? Did I name names in the title? No, I didn't! I think you'll find orginally Brad was upset because the original title was "How can you be so stupid". Which I very promptly changed after he said something. And just an fyi.... saying how can you be so dense would not be considered calling names if it's "NOT ADDRESSED TO SOMEONE IN PARTICULAR"! To make it name calling would require that I say something like "xxx is being dense"! Not much in the way of name calling is it? Especially since I have been called much worse on his blog!

You know shades, this is not the first time we have crossed swords and more than likely will not be the last. But I defy you to find anything here that is not the truth.
Reply #25 from JoeUser Forums Top
Especially since I have been called much worse on his blog!


I would like to know what names they have called you so that I don't repeat them in case I ever feel the need to call you a name. I like to be unique sometimes.