D.C. about to ruin it's own (legal) commuter tax

On D.C., MLB and a stadium lease

This one belongs in multiple categories -- Sports, Politics, Current Events, and probably a few more.

As I write this, the D.C. city council was supposed to have been approving the lease deal for a new stadium for the Washington Nationals, to be built in the blighted S.E. area of D.C., near the Anacostia water front.

S.E. D.C. has been a blighted area for a long time. It consists primarily of the Washington Naval Yard, an Asphalt plant, some failed (and since demolished) housing projects and reduced income apartment buildings that have also been wiped away, and a host of bathhouses and other "gay" bars known as problem spots for most law-abiding citizens.

(And please understand, I'm not trying to generalize and take swipes at gay individuals that might frequent some of the establishments there, but it is well known the businesses there are seedy at best, and not places most people would ever want to visit).

D.C., through it's mayor and city council have tried for years to find ways to get more revenue out of the workers that come to D.C., work during the day and then leave every night. They've asked the Congress repeatedly to let them implement a commuter tax where they could tax these workers that commute into and out of the city every day. They know, or at least claim to know, that these workers use city services such as roads, trash and garbage disposal, water and sewer and other services and they pay almost nothing in taxes because most aren't residents and don't buy gasoline, groceries and other taxable goods in the District of Columbia.

Last year a complete gift horse finally landed in the laps of the D.C. politicians thanks to Mayor Anthony Williams calling baseball's "bluff" and putting a sweetheart deal for baseball on the table. If MLB were to move the carpet-bagging former Montreal Expos to the District, D.C. would build a state of the art stadium for the team.

MLB in return called D.C.'s bluff, and a deal was struck to move the team to D.C.

Last year, 2.7 million fans attended MLB games at a decades old stadium. They came to D.C. from the suburbs, spent money buying concessions, spent money paying for parking, spent money going out to restaurants across town, and otherwise spread their money around in D.C. In effect a willing and eager legal commuter tax was paid.

Now, thanks to the racist stupidity of idiots on the D.C. council like David Catania -- who absolutely opposes baseball in the district and wants not one penney of "public" money to be spent on it -- and the penny pinching of others like Adrian Fenty, who has conned himself into believing that RFK can be remodelled for less, or perhaps using land at RFK would save the district money, D.C. is about to completely blow and ruin it's own legal commuter tax, the extra revenue they are collecting thanks to the MLB fans that have come to the games in D.C.

I say racist with Catania because of his absolute refusal of support for baseball. He apparently believes MLB is a "white person's sport" and isn't something that most of the districts (majority Black/African American/Negro, whatever label wishes to be used) residents care about.

Those idiots on the D.C. council that are against baseball have blatantly lied to the citizens of the district and have told them they are protecting their financial interests, and are protecting tax-payer money. The problem is that the truth is that the stadium was to be paid for by a new tax levied on businesses above a certain size (excluding small businesses) in the District so that district tax payers wouldn't be handed the bill for the stadium.

Now the entire deal is headed for disaster. MLB will likely sue the District for failing to live up to the terms of their own deal. Millions of dollars of actual tax-payer money will be lost in fines and damages paid over to MLB.

The team could possibly be moved out of the District, though it may take a year for that to happen. Meanwhile, S.E. D.C. continues to rot, the costs of a new stadium will continue to rise thanks to inflation and continued hold-outs by citizens that will be forced (eventually) to sell their property to the District for the great urban renewal project that will be the stadium and surrounding areas.

Congratulations to the idiots on the D.C. city council for potentially ruining this great boost for the city of the D.C. and for the baseball fans in the area. Your beloved commuter tax was right there for you to use to your advantage, and you've just about killed it completely. Look in the mirror and blame yourselves. And voters in D.C. that have bought the crap these pol's have sold -- consider yourselves paid back handsomely for your own stupidity. You deserve it.
2,917 views 6 replies
Reply #1 Top
Any city that re-elects Marion Berry cannot have too many Marbles on the top floor anyway.
Reply #2 Top
Any city that re-elects Marion Berry cannot have too many Marbles on the top floor anyway.


The sad thing is that Marion Barry is one of the current crop of council members that hasn't apparently seen their pockets lined well enough to vote in favor of the lease agreement.

Like the others that are anti-stadium, he has tried to claim that he's not anti-baseball per se, but is against wasting tax-payer money on it.

And again, all of those clowns are hypocritical double-talkers, as if there is no stadium deal, there is no tax to pay for it, and even if there is a stadium deal, the taxes to pay for the stadium are a one time special tax on medium and large businesses so that residents don't foot the bill directly.
Reply #3 Top
Sorry, Terp... I didn't do my due diligence. I'm gonna try to address your issues and my own...
The team could possibly be moved out of the District, though it may take a year for that to happen.

I don't see that happening, since other cities are not ready for the 2006 season or even 2007. As I said in my article, no other potential city is equipped or willing to host the homeless Expos.
Now, thanks to the racist stupidity of idiots on the D.C. council like David Catania... because of his absolute refusal of support for baseball. He apparently believes MLB is a "white person's sport" and isn't something that most of the districts (majority Black/African American/Negro, whatever label wishes to be used) residents care about.

Which is an absolutely untenable position for anyone to claim! It's so easy to see that beisbol is more an international sport than a white American sport! Where do all the good players come from? Down in the Caribbean and South America! What color is Sammy Sosa's or Pedro Martinez's skin?

Yeah, this whole DC stadium issue has blown completely out of proportion, out of control. Without a true brain in DC government, this is all gonna go down the toilet. Collect all the Washington Nationals souvenirs and apparel that you can - it'll be a collector's item soon!
Reply #4 Top
Sorry, Terp... I didn't do my due diligence.


Worry not Dave, your article did a much better job of touching on the Sports side of the issues. Reminder to anyone that wishes, please see that excellent article here: DC Rejects New Stadium.

Either way, I think we both agree that the clowns in the D.C. city council are making a mockery of the whole process, and the evil greedy robber barons in the MLB offices are more than willing to hold the council members' feet to the fire.


Like you, I don't expect we will see the Nat's moved out of D.C. right away, and hopefully not at all, but the situation is enough to get MLB to think about moving again, or perhaps to think about just contracting the Nationals away completely.

I agree somewhat with (I think it was) Guy's response in your article's comments that it would be silly to contract away a commodity that is looking like it's worth approximately $450 million if it's sold to new ownership in D.C., but the value of the team may not be that high if there's no stadium and if fans like myself and others get fed up enough with MLB and the D.C. government to just say screw it and no longer bother supporting the team.

At some point the team will hopefully stand on it's own, with new ownership, and hopefully with a new ballpark in Anacostia. S.E. D.C. really does need the economic redevelopment that would come from such a stadium, and it would literally be criminal to let this golden opportunity slip through D.C.'s hands because of a few stupid council members that haven't had enough money slide into their grubby palms.
Reply #5 Top
At some point the team will hopefully stand on it's own, with new ownership, and hopefully with a new ballpark in Anacostia.


You know, the MLB and the DC Council are scaring away potential buyers with their petty and money-grubbing antics.
Reply #6 Top
You know, the MLB and the DC Council are scaring away potential buyers with their petty and money-grubbing antics.


We might think that, but then Marion Barry goes and pulls a buyer outta his nether regions, as he reportedly was working on -- at least until MLB stepped in to smack that potential owner back down.

That's part of the problem here. There are a few deep pocketted potential owners in the mix, including the one that Barry was dealing with.

See the original Washington Post article snippet below:
Barry said yesterday that he had intended for D.C. entrepreneur Jonathan Ledecky, who is one of eight bidders trying to buy the Washington Nationals, to present a plan Ledecky had agreed to with Barry. If baseball sold Ledecky the Nationals, Barry said, Ledecky had agreed to cover cost overruns on the stadium and give African Americans a 40 percent equity stake in the team.
But Barry said he was told by Ledecky's adviser, Frank Smith Jr., a former D.C. Council member, that baseball officials had gotten wind of the plan and told Ledecky to make no such offer. According to several council members in the room, Stephen M. Green, the mayor's top adviser on baseball issues, acknowledged he had tipped off baseball officials.
Furious, Barry accused Green of sabotaging the deal, and the meeting broke up without further discussion, several people at the meeting said.



Barry thought he could play Major League Baseball like a bunch of chumps and pick the new owner himself. That wouldn't seem that harmful except the MLB's ownership is a bunch of good old boys. They don't take too kindly to being told who they have to invite to their club, and they've already indicated a bit of distaste at one of Ledecky's partners: George Soros.

Add in spoken comments (read: threats) by some in Congress to interfere in the process if anti-Bush MoveOn.org funder Soros is involved and you can see that Ledecky has almost no legitimate chance of getting the team, even if he might potentially pay a little more than say Smulyan or Collins or one of the other potential ownership groups would.


Baseball will take their time, they'll toy a bit with the District, and they'll threaten to sue for damages just to send a shot across the bow of the idiots on the council.

Meanwhile, some on the council (like Marion Barry) will grandstand and try to say it's about saving tax-payer money when it's all about what they can blackmail the mayor to give them for their constituents. At some point enough back-room deals are done, and a stadium gets built. Soon after an owner will be announced, and soon after that there'll be a bunch of bitchin' and gripin' that the stadium wasn't as good as it could be and how it will need a bunch of upgrades to make it better. That's when the real fun will really begin.