What's not WMD's?

Ok...now, lets take this in steps.

What are Weapons of Mass Destruction? (aka WMD's) Anyone? Here is a definition i found:

Weapons that are capable of a high order of destruction and/or of being used in such a manner as to destroy large numbers of people. Weapons of mass destruction can be high explosives or nuclear, biological, chemical, and radiological weapons, but exclude the means of transporting or propelling the weapon where such means is a separable and divisible part of the weapon

Link

Now, would...lets say.. Ricin, Mustard Gas, VX gas be WMD's? Yes. By the definition above they would be.

So, you're (anti bush folks basing their opinion on "no" WMD's) telling me, that the cannisters of Mustard gas and the ricin that were found in iraq, are NOT WMD's?

I mean, technically they are. While i can understand that perhaps the way bush presented the intell, etc... may have led to current views on the war.

But to say that there weren't...thats BS.

Link

The link above talks about IED's with Sarin and MG in it. Now, tell me, how did the cannisters and shells get there? Did the magically grow legs and walk in? Or perhaps,they were there in the first place. Hmmm?

Just some thoughts...

-Lucas

Link

Link

Link

politics

Locked Post

Advanced Search

Watch this post

Do not email me updates for this post Email me updates for this post