Hmmm.....Hillary is losing her appeal

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,175314,00.html
from JoeUser Forums

Angela Merkel will be the new leader of Germany (long or short).  She follows Margaret Thatcher, Gold Meir, Sirimavo Bandaranaike, Indira Ghandi, Elisabeth Domitien, Maria de Lourdes Pintasilgo, Mary Eugenia Charles, Gro Harlem Brundtland, Milka Planinc, Benazir Bhutto, Kazimiera Danutë Prunskienë, Khaleda Zia, Edith Cresson, Hanna Suchocka, Kim Campbell, Tansu Çiller, Sylvie Kinigi, Agathe Uwilingiyimana, Chandrika Kumaratunga, Reneta Indzhova, Claudette Werleigh, Sheikh Hasina Wajed, Janet Jagan, Jenny Shipley, Irena Degutienë,Nyam-Osoriyn Tuyaa, Helen Elizabeth Clark, Mame Madior Boye, Chang Sang,Maria das Neves Ceita Baptista de Sousa, Anneli Tuulikki Jäätteenmäki, Beatriz Merino Lucero, Luísa Dias Diogo, Radmila Sekerinska, Yuliya Tymoshenko, Maria do Carmo Silveira.

Sorry, I got carpal tunnel listing them.  All great women!  Not a single one with the name of Hillary.  And so what?
politics
8,614 views 32 replies
Reply #1 from JoeUser Forums Top
you know all these women? Boy I'm impressed! I guess I've got some catching up to do. Oh and Hillary? She lost her appeal a long long time ago.
Reply #2 from JoeUser Forums Top
I don't really see what the link or your "commentary" have to do with Hmmm.....Hillary is losing her appeal

Was Hillary running for the chancellor of Germany and lost out to this woman.

I lose more respect for you with every one of your point-whoring "articles" that you endlessly post.
Start11 - Customize the Start Menu and Taskbar in Windows 10/11.
Reply #3 from JoeUser Forums Top

you know all these women? Boy I'm impressed! I guess I've got some catching up to do. Oh and Hillary? She lost her appeal a long long time ago.

They are all women who have led Countries already.  I was impressed that there are so many.

Reply #4 from JoeUser Forums Top

I lose more respect for you with every one of your point-whoring "articles" that you endlessly post.

Dont like it?  Dont read it.  I post what is of interest to me, not to you.  If you cannot understand that, I am sorry for you.

And 3 responses is not a point whoring article.

Reply #5 from JoeUser Forums Top
New one to add soon: Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf
Reply #6 from JoeUser Forums Top
wholly moses. potential candidates are atta disadvantage unless they bear the name of a previous leader?

brilliant analysis.

(davad70, drguy isn't solely at fault for having taken point whoring to a whole new level; i'm pretty sure he could type a page full of nothing but consonants and a half dozen readers would chime in to add their agreement.)
Reply #7 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: KFC(Anonymous User)Posted: Friday, November 11, 2005you know all these women? Boy I'm impressed! I guess I've got some catching up to do


your sarcasm is quite unbecoming......and being anonymous is being a chicken.....squawk, squawk..
Reply #8 from JoeUser Forums Top
And making taunting chicken noises is what? A good thing?
Reply #9 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: davad70Posted: Friday, November 11, 2005I don't really see what the link or your "commentary" have to do with Hmmm.....Hillary is losing her appeal


If that's the case then you indeed have missed the boat![quote

I lose more respect for you with every one of your point-whoring "articles" that you endlessly post

, if he wanted to post a "point-whoring" article, there's other JUsers that could give him lessons.....
and being as he has his own self-respect, he doesn't need yours!
Reply #10 from JoeUser Forums Top
wholly moses. potential candidates are atta disadvantage unless they bear the name of a previous leader?

brilliant analysis.


Yeah, I guess I could make blog with a list of respected and adored male leaders, mention that none of them is named George, and then title it Hmmm.....George losing his appeal. And then, when people question the purpose of such a posting I could simply reply:

Dont like it? Dont read it. I post what is of interest to me, not to you. If you cannot understand that, I am sorry for you.
Reply #11 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: Dr. GuyPosted: Saturday, November 12, 2005New one to add soon: Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf


hey doc, I appreciate your monumental list of women! It's wonderful!

and I "fer sure" understand about how names lose their appeal in certain decades, my sister's
name was popular in a 40's tune and that's what mom named for, a song.
Reply #12 from JoeUser Forums Top
Hillary made the mistake of not "resting her brand". Had she done a nice job in Congress and kept her domineering piehole out of the press for a couple of years she would have done herself a service. Instead she spent the last few years being the same kind of negative, whining foil she made her name as, and has kept why we despise her fresh in everyone's mind.
Reply #13 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: UBoBPosted: Saturday, November 12, 2005And making taunting chicken noises is what? A good thing?


it made about as much sense as being sarcastic, and being anonymous while slamming someone!
Reply #14 from JoeUser Forums Top

wholly moses. potential candidates are atta disadvantage unless they bear the name of a previous leader?

Never said that.  Want to read it again?  Try reading and not pontificating.  If you are able.

Reply #15 from JoeUser Forums Top

(davad70, drguy isn't solely at fault for having taken point whoring to a whole new level; i'm pretty sure he could type a page full of nothing but consonants and a half dozen readers would chime in to add their agreement.)

Actually, only the mind numbed robots of the left would.  Conservatives are too smart for that.  But thank you for proving your point.

Reply #16 from JoeUser Forums Top

your sarcasm is quite unbecoming......and being anonymous is being a chicken.....squawk, squawk..

Actually, she/he has been engaging me on my Catholic Blog.  I already invited them to join.  Perhaps they will.

Reply #17 from JoeUser Forums Top

And making taunting chicken noises is what? A good thing?

UB, we invite anons to join if they have something constructive to say.  Trudy saw that as a baiting, and so challenged.  After all, Joining costs nothing, except civility.

Reply #18 from JoeUser Forums Top

if he wanted to post a "point-whoring" article, there's other JUsers that could give him lessons.....
and being as he has his own self-respect, he doesn't need yours!

I am honored!  Thank you!  I dont think Davad knows what PW is.  He is old, and yet really a newbie.

Reply #19 from JoeUser Forums Top

Yeah, I guess I could make blog with a list of respected and adored male leaders, mention that none of them is named George, and then title it Hmmm.....George losing his appeal. And then, when people question the purpose of such a posting I could simply reply:

Close!  But you missed the point.  Try again.  And as I said before, you dont like it?  Dont read it.  He was not questioning the purpose.  He was slamming me.  Aint I so civil?

Reply #20 from JoeUser Forums Top

and I "fer sure" understand about how names lose their appeal in certain decades, my sister's
name was popular in a 40's tune and that's what mom named for, a song.

These are women who have truly achieved.  Some on the coattails of their husbands, but most on their own.  I was only trying to point out that those who idolize Hillary Clinton, who has achieved nothing, are trying to make a mountain out of a mole hill literally.  Perhaps one day she will join this list.  Perhaps not.  But until and unless she does, I think it is very arrogant to put her at the head of it.

Reply #21 from JoeUser Forums Top

Hillary made the mistake of not "resting her brand". Had she done a nice job in Congress and kept her domineering piehole out of the press for a couple of years she would have done herself a service. Instead she spent the last few years being the same kind of negative, whining foil she made her name as, and has kept why we despise her fresh in everyone's mind.

Baker gets the Cookie!  YES!  That is exactly it!  She pretended to belong to this list, when in fact she has yet to have anything in common with them!

These women are doers, not talkers.  She is the talker, not the doer. Sorry kingbee and davad.  you dont win anything.  You just figured it was a bash someone article.  You lose again!  But I guess you are use to it.

Reply #22 from JoeUser Forums Top

it made about as much sense as being sarcastic, and being anonymous while slamming someone!

More.  But in this case, KFC was not slamming, but sarcastic?  Yep.  He/she does have a sense of humor!

Reply #23 from JoeUser Forums Top
Conservatives are too smart for that


i dunno. it drew in an exceptionally intelligent & articulate conservative. good thing too. until bakerstreet showed up with some genuine content, there wasn't much here but a pandering title, a list of names and a concluding non-sequitur.
Reply #24 from JoeUser Forums Top
Yup you're right again Doc....hoping you didn't think I was into the slamming....cuz that's not me...but sarcastic...yup that's me!! I admit it...I've got to work on that....and Trudy...you really got to work on that squeak...um squawk.
Reply #25 from JoeUser Forums Top
wholly moses. potential candidates are atta disadvantage unless they bear the name of a previous leader?

brilliant analysis.


Yeah, I guess I could make blog with a list of respected and adored male leaders, mention that none of them is named George, and then title it Hmmm.....George losing his appeal. And then, when people question the purpose of such a posting I could simply reply:

Dont like it? Dont read it. I post what is of interest to me, not to you. If you cannot understand that, I am sorry for you.


That would be fine on "your" blog!