A challenge to the "pro-Bush" crowd
from 
JoeUser Forums
JoeUser Forums
I have a challenge to those bloggers here who are pro-bush...
The challenge is:
Name three instances when bush responded/acted ineffectively and/or incorrectly. (In your opinion) (i.e. Katrina, Abu Ghraib, etc...)
Name three policies of bush's that (during his 2000 or 2004 campaign) you disagreed with, and state why (if you do ) you disagree with them.
Name three negative aspects of Bush. (Truly negative, not crap)
-Can ya do it?
Note: This is only for the pro-bush crowd. And no using the examples given.
Well, I'm trying to prove a theory of mine. That there is no such thing as a rational, logical, intelligent pro-bush person. IMO its all about some sort of blind nationalism, perhaps there is an underlying problem that creates their blind nationalism. Perhaps?
Actually, I am sick and tired of having people demand we rack our brains to try to find good things about Bush, and saying if we have trouble with it or don't feel like playing your game, all liberals are crazed idiots full of hate. Finding three things you like about Bush doesn't prove you are more intelligent than someone who is considered more "moderate." We just see the world in different ways, that doesn't make us dumber and needing to find three things we like about him to redeem us.
The challenge is:
Name three instances when bush responded/acted ineffectively and/or incorrectly. (In your opinion) (i.e. Katrina, Abu Ghraib, etc...)
Name three policies of bush's that (during his 2000 or 2004 campaign) you disagreed with, and state why (if you do ) you disagree with them.
Name three negative aspects of Bush. (Truly negative, not crap)
-Can ya do it?
Note: This is only for the pro-bush crowd. And no using the examples given.
Well, I'm trying to prove a theory of mine. That there is no such thing as a rational, logical, intelligent pro-bush person. IMO its all about some sort of blind nationalism, perhaps there is an underlying problem that creates their blind nationalism. Perhaps?
Actually, I am sick and tired of having people demand we rack our brains to try to find good things about Bush, and saying if we have trouble with it or don't feel like playing your game, all liberals are crazed idiots full of hate. Finding three things you like about Bush doesn't prove you are more intelligent than someone who is considered more "moderate." We just see the world in different ways, that doesn't make us dumber and needing to find three things we like about him to redeem us.
