One thing that makes me happy

And when he is exonerated?

to take pleasure in anyones misfortune is not a kind trait, You are kinder to criminals and terrorist than you are to conservatives dabe, do you not think that something about that is out of kilter?

What the flip makes you think I'm kinder to criminals and terrorists? Only a flinking repuke would make a statement like this. Empty, moronic and boinking ridiculous.

And, why are you so sure he'll be exonerated? I'm just happy for now that the repuke has been forced to step down.

I wonder Miss Dabe, how many liberal democrats are cheering on the outside, but fearing for more investigations on the inside. Do you really think DeLay is alone in this kind of activity (if in fact he's guilty).

I know for a fact that many of the democrats here in Wisconsin (Feingold included) owe their jobs to voter fraud.. I wonder how many others' owe their positions to the same criminal behavior that they work so hard to perpetuate.

In other words... don't celebrate others' misfortune unless you are sure your side is innocent.

I now return you to your celebration already in progress.... ;~D

Reply By: dabePosted: Thursday, September 29, 2005What the flip makes you think I'm kinder to criminals and terrorists? Only a flinking repuke would make a statement like this. Empty, moronic and boinking ridiculous.

why are you being angry with me?

Mod, I'm not angry with you. Think about it. You accuse me of being kinder to criminals and terrorists. What about that statement would make you think I'd want to have you as my friend? You insulted me with empty know-nothing, standard republican hyperbolic rhetorical nonsense. I'm not angy. If that is an example of what you consider to be "nice", why should I even like you?

Glad there is something that makes you happy, dabe, even if it is simple ghoulish delight. I was beginning to wonder.

Finding a way to force DeLay to step down was the whole point of Mr. Earle's exercise, after all.

Cheers,
Daiwa

boinking ridiculous

Dabe, please quit trying to replace your patented foul language with kinder, gentler "colorful methaphors". It's making you sound even stupider than you usually sound. You sound like a Three Stooges short.
How about just simply making your point without going ghetto and trying for the street creds? Others do it, and it works pretty well for them.
Give it the old college try, huh?

Nothing makes you happy, dabe, unless it somehow vindicates your narrow perspective and brings problems and misery to the legions you hate. You are the Mr. Wilson of JU.

And I have a question....when is Nancy Pelosi going to be indicted for the SAME THING? She won't, because the dems give a free pass to their own for their transgressions. The ole Double Standard trick again.

And, why are you so sure he'll be exonerated?

Want to bet on it?  You name the stakes.  And when he is exonerated, will you eat crow?

10 reasons why Tom DeLay should resign from Congress

1. Tom DeLay violates ethics rules at will, making him a national embarrassment. Indeed, he has earned four formal ethics violations, a truly rare achievement, as only five Members of Congress have been chastised by the committee in the last six years.

2. Tom DeLay embodies the worst of pay-to-play politics – he puts big donors like Enron ahead of the rest of us.

3. Tom DeLay abuses his position as House Majority Leader to trample on the legislative process and stretches the rules of campaign fundraising far as he can.

4. Tom DeLay accepted travel expenses from a registered foreign agent, in apparent violation of House rules.

5. Tom DeLay used illegal corporate contributions to disenfranchise hundreds of thousands of Texas voters with his anti-democratic re-districting scheme.

6. Tom DeLay uses tax dollars and government resources for partisan political gain.

7. Tom DeLay opposes any reasonable campaign finance laws, even disclosure of donations.

8. Tom DeLay shakes down small business owners for campaign contributions.

9. Tom DeLay received all expenses-paid junket from a lobbyist accused of bilking tens of millions of dollars from six Native American tribes.

10. Tom DeLay believes he is above the law.

More can be found here, including the details of each of the ten points above. Link DeLay is going doooowwwwwnnnnn.............................

More can be found here, including the details of each of the ten points above. Link DeLay is going doooowwwwwnnnnn.............................

Not without proof, and that is sadly lacking in all the allegations.  You cant convict someone in this country of a crime for the sole reason you dont like him.

My Offer still stands.

Tom DeLay believes he is above the law.

This is just the opinon of one of the most partisan posters we have here, and one of the most unreasonably rabid and angry liberals I've ever had the misfortune of encountering.
If this were the case, there would be less Democrats in the House and Senate than Republicans. For example, Ted Kennedy is a murderer, but because of his family connections and his position is somehow above the law. As I indicated above, Nancy Pelosi is guilty of the exact same "crimes" that she was berating Delay for yesterday, but somehow is given a pass for her indiscretions.

The more I hear, the more convinced I become that the Courts and Justice system are being used as a hammer against "The Hammer", which is so low and despicable on he part of the left that it's becoming ever clearer just ho desperate they are for any small victory against us, no matter how underhanded.

After all, Delay's name is not even actually mentioned in the indictment, except as a defendant. When all is said and done, Delay's not going anywhere.

#8 by dabe Thursday, September 29, 2005

od, I'm not angry with you. Think about it. You accuse me of being kinder to criminals and terrorists. What about that statement would make you think I'd want to have you as my friend? You insulted me with empty know-nothing, standard republican hyperbolic rhetorical nonsense. I'm not angy. If that is an example of what you consider to be "nice", why should I even like you?

dabe I doubt we will ever be friends, we are just to different.

In more than one article I saw youdefending the "rights" of terror suspects, why are you not affording the same rights to DeLay? whatever happened to innocent till PROOVEN guilty?

I am hoping for some coutesy between us dabe, we have the chance to show people that 2 people from completely differing backgrounds and politics can have intelligent discourse without mud slinging. ok?

Dabe, please quit trying to replace your patented foul language with kinder, gentler "colorful methaphors". It's making you sound even stupider than you usually sound.

If I sound stupid to you, then I know I'm doing something right. You are no measure of the kind of behavior that a person should follow. On the contrary........................

If I sound stupid to you, then I know I'm doing something right.

If it were JUST me, you might have something. On the contrary..........

In more than one article I saw youdefending the "rights" of terror suspects, why are you not affording the same rights to DeLay? whatever happened to innocent till PROOVEN guilty?

It's not that I would defend their rights, or side with terrorists. I've posted that torture and mistreatment, no matter who its being perpetrated by and to whom, is inhumane, and is against the Geneva Conventions. That does not mean I like terrorists or hold them to some higher standard. It's insulting that you, or anyone would even think so. But, it is very typical of neocon speak. It's a way of deflecting the issue, spin it away from those "coalition of the willing" who happen to be undertaking such crap.

As for DeLay, of course you're right. Innocent until proven guilty. However, I'm convinced he's guilty as sin, that he is sin incarnate, and frankly, forcing him to step down right now is worth its weight in gold. It's a hit to the dubya administration and the neocon agenda. I look forward to the day that these scumsucking jerks are booted out of government, and government is again returned to people who care, be they republicans or democrats. After all, even repubs are distancing themselves from the extremist and failing agenda of the dubya dummies. But, it seems that the neocon lovers here at JU are somewhat slow on the uptake. I just hope that some day you'll get it. Some day, you'll see how you, and we as a country collectively, have been thoroughly fleeced and screwed by these jerks.

I am hoping for some coutesy between us dabe, we have the chance to show people that 2 people from completely differing backgrounds and politics can have intelligent discourse without mud slinging. ok?

If you were truly interested in courtesy and intelligent discourse, you wouldn't be posting the multitude of ridiculous, mud-slinging hyperbole against liberals. In fact, what I take from this is that it's OK for you to sling, but not me. In other words, I don't see you as being very sincere.

However, I'm convinced he's guilty as sin, that he is sin incarnate, and frankly, forcing him to step down right now is worth its weight in gold.

1) What "proof" has convinced you?
2) So the ends "do" justify the means, no matter the morality of those means? Rather anti-liberal point of view, there.

Cheers,
Daiwa

no matter the morality of those means? Rather anti-liberal point of view, there.

No, no....it's perfectly liberal. Morality never comes into play for them. No rules but what they make.

It's a hit to the dubya administration and the neocon agenda. I look forward to the day that these scumsucking jerks are booted out of government,

----dabe

And this, ladies and gentlemen, is the reason, the only reason, that dabe cares what happens with Tom Delay. If it were a Democrat, she'd be crying foul right now. We all know it...even her.

No, no....it's perfectly liberal.

I was referring to liberal rhetoric, as opposed to liberal behavior.

Cheers,
Daiwa

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,171336,00.html

Still wont take my bet?

sought to have the original conspiracy charge dismissed Monday by arguing in a court filing that the indictment was based on a law that the Legislature changed law in 2003. The indictment alleges that the illegal acts date to 2002.

DeGuerin accused Earle of "trying to patch up a terrible blunder he made last week for indicting Mr. DeLay for something that wasn't a crime."