Request:Make Players Be punished for dedicating a planet to one thing

ETC.

from GalCiv2 Forums
i belive that if a planet has mostly industrial items it should have high pollution and therby hurt its PQ Slowly. i think PQ could be improved if its well tended too so over years planet Quality increases. anyways, if a planet is all influencial it will have economical problems and be weak in producing Weapons. A all out economy planet would have the issue that tis weak in weapons production and can easily be taken over by Comercial giant civs. fill in any gaps....
ideas
6,514 views 9 replies
Reply #1 from Stardock Forums Top
No I don't agree, a research world would be protected by weapons made on an industrial world as an example. Your civ would move goods between its worlds. If the civ as a whole is overly specialised then yes you suffer, but I think adding penalties to specialising worlds would be annoying to manage.
Reply #2 from Stardock Forums Top
i suppose... but you know somting... but mainly i wanted to point out that PQ should be reduced if a world is too industrialized and a world that is more "natural" should get a better PQ over time... i think that this is the effect of a flood over time like whats hapening in real life...
Sins of a Solar Empire II
Reply #3 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
HA! I guess having a world with nothing but mines and power plants isn't such a bad idea after all


PS: I disagree as well. Wait for more of the game (such as colony buildings/improvements) to be implemented before making first and final judgements on the gameplay.
Reply #4 from Stardock Forums Top
how bout we just say that by this time all power plants and factories are run be fusion so there is no pollution
Reply #6 from Stardock Forums Top
Why ?
I believe the Funboy's idea is actually oposite - DO use dedicated planets ...
Reply #7 from GalCiv2 Forums Top

Starcat: Ooooh....random events baced on specific types of planetary improvement    I like it!  I'll try and squeeze this into our otehrwise bloated schedule!

KiRon: Your right, Frogboy (the Game Designer for GC2) WANTS players to have specific planets throughout their empire.  Player's will already be forced to deal with keeping their citizens happy with "Entertainment" projects...It'd seriously sap out the fun if you we're FORCED to build other types of projects, even if you didn't strategically want them.

Players should think of Projects as being more than jsut the improvement itself...if you build a Power Planet, it's not just a huge chunk of land with only power plants on it.  That land has a about 40% powerplants and 60% infrustructure to house the citizens needed to run those plants (housing, supermarkets, ect ect).

 

Reply #8 from Stardock Forums Top
Players should think of Projects as being more than jsut the improvement itself...if you build a Power Planet, it's not just a huge chunk of land with only power plants on it. That land has a about 40% powerplants and 60% infrustructure to house the citizens needed to run those plants (housing, supermarkets, ect ect).


And there was me trying to turn an area the size of britain into one massive factory building!

/me slaps architect
Reply #9 from Stardock Forums Top
".random events baSed on specific types of planetary improvement"

I do hope you mean beneficial as well as harmful events.. *hint* *hint*

"And there was me trying to turn an area the size of britain into one massive factory building!"

That's nothing. On xasica, the banks withdraw YOU. That is until the discovery of xeno corporations.