Democrats Demand more records.

Judge Roberts and the Democrats.

from JoeUser Forums
Since the left can find no real reason to stop the nomination of the honorable Judge Roberts for SCOTUS, they are as usual looking for anything to latch on to so the can obstruct his appointment.

The Democrats are now demanding Judge Roberts kindergarten records to see if at anytime he refused to take a nap Also in question is Judge Robers failed his very first math exam in grade school, which should disqualify him from any cases with money involved. The Democrats will continue to ask for records till they have read every piece of paper about Judge Roberts in the futile search for anything no matter how slight to latch on to In order to continue to do what they do best, OBSTRUCT anything President Bush wants. When will the left do anything but obstruct? I for one am damn tired of it, the left now has over 130,000 documents about Roberts, is not this enough?
5,721 views 21 replies
Reply #1 from JoeUser Forums Top

I think they are asking for the kindergarten records to see if he stole any milk money.

Reply #2 from JoeUser Forums Top
Just think how it will be in 10 years or so when a candidates blog from when he or she was just a face in the cybercrowd....

Sometimes I joke to myself while I'm writing an article.... "well, there goes my shot at the Supreme Court!" ;~D
Siege of Centauri
Reply #3 from JoeUser Forums Top
It is very transparent & tiresome what they are doing.

The Dems are amazing - stuck in a hole deep as the Grand Canyon & all they do is demand more shovels.

Cheers,
Daiwa
Reply #4 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: Dr. GuyPosted: Monday, August 22, 2005I think they are asking for the kindergarten records to see if he stole any milk money.


nope he once refused to take a nap and now the democrats claim that shows he is a rebel and will legislate from the bench.
Reply #5 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: ParaTed2kPosted: Monday, August 22, 2005Just think how it will be in 10 years or so when a candidates blog from when he or she was just a face in the cybercrowd....Sometimes I joke to myself while I'm writing an article.... "well, there goes my shot at the Supreme Court!" ;~D


sadly I never had a shot at the law, my bad conduct discharge prevents that. oh well. sniff
Reply #6 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: DaiwaPosted: Monday, August 22, 2005It is very transparent & tiresome what they are doing.The Dems are amazing - stuck in a hole deep as the Grand Canyon & all they do is demand more shovels.Cheers,Daiwa


I just hope the general public will remember election day how much the left obstructed and stonewalled.
Reply #7 from JoeUser Forums Top

nope he once refused to take a nap and now the democrats claim that shows he is a rebel and will legislate from the bench.

I got pictures of him stealing little susies milk money.  Wonder how much Dirty Harry Reid will pay for them?

Reply #8 from JoeUser Forums Top
MM were you rotten to the Corps? ;~D
Reply #9 from JoeUser Forums Top
MM were you rotten to the Corps?


Bwahahahhahhaa...nice pun. Hehe.
Reply #10 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: ParaTed2kPosted: Monday, August 22, 2005MM were you rotten to the Corps? ;~D


I get it, but sadly was rotten to a very new 2ndlt. seems there is some kind of rule about "no slapping officers" Imagine that?
Reply #11 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: Texas WahinePosted: Monday, August 22, 2005MM were you rotten to the Corps?Bwahahahhahhaa...nice pun. Hehe.


very nice, made me smile.

hey tex???







bump.
Reply #12 from JoeUser Forums Top
Ah, so you were busted in a Butter Bar Brawl! ;~D
Reply #13 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: ParaTed2kPosted: Monday, August 22, 2005Ah, so you were busted in a Butter Bar Brawl! ;~D


was no brawl there was just 2 thuds, the first me hitting him the second him hitting the deck.
Reply #14 from JoeUser Forums Top
... and a third.. you hitting the block! ;~D
Reply #15 from JoeUser Forums Top
one of the reasons for my mistrust of bush was my envisioning a scenario like this one. considering the congress passed a law specifying a reasonable amount of time between the end of an administration and the date upon which its records (all except those judged to be a legitimate threat to national security) would revert to the people who paid for them--and considering ronald reagan lenghtened that time period a bit more--there was no valid or defensible reason for gwbush to keep us in the dark for generations.

unreasonable government secrecy is anathema to our traditions and ideals. it also inspires justifiable suspicion.
Reply #16 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: kingbeePosted: Tuesday, August 23, 2005one of the reasons for my mistrust of bush was my envisioning a scenario like this one. considering the congress passed a law specifying a reasonable amount of time between the end of an administration and the date upon which its records (all except those judged to be a legitimate threat to national security) would revert to the people who paid for them--and considering Ronald Reagan lengthened that time period a bit more--there was no valid or defensible reason for gw bush to keep us in the dark for generations. unreasonable government secrecy is anathema to our traditions and ideals. it also inspires justifiable suspicion.


I do not like government secrecy either kingbee, but this is so obviously a fishing expedition, No white house council has ever been made to turn over records, not one, also the has never been a religious "litmus test"
Reply #17 from JoeUser Forums Top

I do not like government secrecy either kingbee, but this is so obviously a fishing expedition, No white house council has ever been made to turn over records, not one, also the has never been a religious "litmus test"

Basically it amounts to them wanting to see his doodling.  Since doodling is in the eyes of the beholder, they can interpret it any way they want to spin it, and you know it will not be in a flattering way.

Reply #18 from JoeUser Forums Top
unreasonable government secrecy is anathema to our traditions and ideals. it also inspires justifiable suspicion.


It may be anathema, but happens to have been SOP for a loooong time now. Take the Kennedy assassination, for instance. You have the same reason to mistrust any and all presidents, kb, not just 43.

Cheers,
Daiwa
Reply #19 from JoeUser Forums Top
14 by ParaTed2k
Tuesday, August 23, 2005


and a third.. you hitting the block! ;~D


30 days in the brig.. bcd, loss of all pay, busted to private.

was excused due to battle fatigue, remember that term?
Reply #20 from JoeUser Forums Top
#17 by Dr. Guy
Wednesday, August 24, 2005


do not like government secrecy either kingbee, but this is so obviously a fishing expedition, No white house council has ever been made to turn over records, not one, also the has never been a religious "litmus test"

Basically it amounts to them wanting to see his doodling. Since doodling is in the eyes of the beholder, they can interpret it any way they want to spin it, and you know it will not be in a flattering way.


totally a fishing trip, looking for anything to OBSTRUCT.
Reply #21 from JoeUser Forums Top
18 by Daiwa
Wednesday, August 24, 2005


It may be anathema, but happens to have been SOP for a loooong time now. Take the Kennedy assassination, for instance. You have the same reason to mistrust any and all presidents, kb, not just 43.

Cheers,


I have never trusted any President since JFK and I was to young to know better than to trust him.