There have been previous presidents with lower scores (Nixon and Truman during their last terms for example). |
You do know that while Truman was in office his rating was very low, but now he is placed seventh as the best President.
Link
All the great presidents are the ones who made the hard decisions. Lincoln also had low approval rating, and he is rated third.
The question will be if the Democrats will be able to produce a good candidate in 2008. Many Republicans that I know would love to see another Kerry choice. IMO Governor Richardson of Arizona would be a good candidate. But who ever the Republicans run will not be stuck with Bush's legacy because of the following reasons:
1. The VP will not be running, so the Gore/Clinton stigma will not be there.
2. While the wars in Iraq maybe unpopular, all indications show that the general public knows that it is something that must be completed. So any pro-war Republican will not be dinged for supporting actions there.
IMO it will be the great race for the center in the 2008 election and if one of the parties decides not to run for the center it will lose.
The radical left has finally started to be ignored by the middle, but unfortunately they did gain many of the key funding positions in the DNC. We will have to see if that will affect the primaries.
As for the Republicans I believe the front runners at this time are more moderate, but that may not help much if there is no clear primary leader by the time that the religious South gets their chance to vote. That will determine if Bush's legacy will hurt the next candidate, if he/she is a person of socially religious politics.
But as for rating affecting Bush..... Who cares? He will just be as dead politically as Clinton is now, in three years.