Dr Guy Dr Guy

Democrats cant seem to learn

▼

Democrats cant seem to learn

Even Monkeys get it right 50% of the time

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-072505dnc_lat,0,4442905.story?coll=la-home-headlines
from JoeUser Forums

The Democrat Leadership Council was created in response to the disasters of the 80 and 84 elections to drag the democrat party back towards the center.  In it, it was lead by conservative governors, mostly from the south.  Indeed it was an awakening of the democrats that they could not neglect the south and win the Presidency.  And it worked.  Clinton won on a left center (moderately liberal) platform in 92.

Clinton was a leader in the DLC, and to this day probably plays an important part.  Bill that is.  Now the DLC has basically thrown in their hats to the NE liberal establishment.  They have gone over to the NE liberal side of the party.  How?  By allowing Clinton to write the agenda for the group!

But, but, but you say!  Was he not the prime example of the fact that it worked?  Wrong Clinton!  They have asked Hillary, by far one of the most shrillest and left members of the democrats (regardless of what you think she is becoming), and a perfect fit for the NE Liberal ilk of the likes of Kennedy, Kerry, Leahy and Durbin.  And the DLC whose mission was to win elections has just been emasculated.

Kind of funny that the member of the democrat party with the most balls is none other than the Royal Queen herself.  And even Clinton (bill this time) had to distance himself from her left wing policies and some of her nominations during his term as President.

The DLC appears to be a one trick pony.  They got Clinton elected, but now that the loony left part of the party is running the show, their run is over.  A shame really.  They were kind of the last hope for a return to a 2 party system, instead of one party and a bunch of raving lunatics.

politics
11,707 views 34 replies
Reply #26 from JoeUser Forums Top

you'll have to cite the law by which the first lady is either permitted submit a nominee or forbidden to proffer her husband advice (or answers, ala nancy...or opinions ala barbara & betty).

I dont beleive any one was talking legalities here.  You asked, I gave you an example.  If you wanted to know what illegality Hillary committed while in the white house, try Vince Foster.  But I understand that dead men tell no tales however.

Reply #27 from JoeUser Forums Top

How about one centered to the near left, and one centered to the near right?


Boring.

Well, then it will not be boring for the foreseeable future I guess!

CursorFX - Customize your Windows cursor
Reply #28 from JoeUser Forums Top
If you wanted to know what illegality Hillary committed while in the white house, try Vince Foster. But I understand that dead men tell no tales however.


And you guys calls US kooks????
Reply #29 from JoeUser Forums Top
Davad: When stymied conjure up the dead! Lefties are not permitted to call righties names.
Reply #30 from JoeUser Forums Top
I dont beleive any one was talking legalities here


you suggested hillary clinton nominated janet reno to be attorney general. while i don't doubt for a second you believe that to be the case, i was pointing out the fact (and, yes, it is a fact) she couldn't have done so legally.

what vince foster has to do with the discussion to that point is inexplicable without subjecting you to an mri.
Reply #31 from JoeUser Forums Top

And you guys calls US kooks????

No, where did I call you a kook?  As I clearly stated, and you missed, I dont know of any illegalities she has committed.  Do you?

Reply #32 from JoeUser Forums Top

Davad: When stymied conjure up the dead! Lefties are not permitted to call righties names.

Sure you are (altho You never do)!  Zoomba calls me a fuzzy NeoCon!  If he stops, then I will know I am dead!

Reply #33 from JoeUser Forums Top

you suggested hillary clinton nominated janet reno to be attorney general.

I suggested no such thing!  She has never had the power!  I did suggest that Hillary gave the name to Bill and he nominated her.

Reply #34 from JoeUser Forums Top

what vince foster has to do with the discussion to that point is inexplicable without subjecting you to an mri.

My MRI came up clean, so you are safe.  That was a side bar when the question of legality came in on this (which was not a part of the original or any other parts of this article).  Since Vince Foster was HER lawyer, I suggested the person talk to him, and then made the lame attempt at humor that dead men tell no tales.