Zoomba, can you say it with a little more passion? I admire your deadpan, but put some spark into it!
I agree totally. I think Rehnquist would have been an easy one as the worst they would have gotten is a tit for tat. But O'Connor being a swing vote, they are going to fight her replacement visciously. They are already gearing up for the fight.
Great minds think alike! And I dont think they are squirming. They are just gearing up for a filibuster.
Oh, this is the calm before the storm!
If they can find some spines between now and then.
Oh, I know it! Already Biden is spitting on himself:
ANd he actually got elected!
If you can show me where the republicans used the filibuster on Judicial nominees in the past, your statement might have some relevance. As it is, Ruth Buzzi got a unanimous vote, even tho she is left of Mao.
And the way they are going, a BIG if.
If there are any left by then.
The difference between Nixon of the 70s and the democrats of the 21st century, is the Republicans took their lumps got over it and went on. The democrats refused to take their lumps (it depends on what he meaning of the word is is), refuse to get over (Bush is a liar and a thief) it, and refuse to move on (Selected not elected).
Oops! Scuse me please.
There are many great features available to you once you register, including:
Sign in or Create Account
Press | Support Copyright © 2026 Stardock Entertainment. The Political Machine is a trademark of Stardock Entertainment. Steam and the Steam logo are trademarks and/or registered trademarks of Valve Corporation in the U.S. and/or other countries. All rights reserved.