Moderateman Moderateman

Liberal memorial to those that died

▼

Liberal memorial to those that died

NOT what you expect.

from JoeUser Forums
With all the crap being spewed by the left about how the poor terrorist are being treated, it's only a matter of time before they get
public enemy number 1 {george I bought the Democratic party soros} to erect a monument to those brave freedom fighters, that died a glorious death fighting Republican oppression.


Maybe a statue with all 19 terrorist, surrounded by virgins would be right, with a saying under the monument reading.

HERE lies the remains of these brave 19 freedom fighter that gladly gave there lives flying jets into a buildings containing vicious civilians that would have become future nazis, women that would have gave birth to more future nazis.

Our hearts are with you brave men, signed the Democratic party.
politics
9,978 views 37 replies
Reply #26 from JoeUser Forums Top
And presumably the causes of terrorism do not include Arab fascism and religious fanaticism, and the real causes would be addressed by not interfering with the region terrorism comes from?


Good point....not unlike the isolationists of the pre-WWI and pre-WWII eras, these folks, for all their talk of good international relations and such, think it's best to just put our heads in the sand and ignore the problem, and maybe it'll just go away. The only problem there, that I can see, is that radical Islam is just a little bit imperialist in its own right, and, given the power and backing, would not stop until their ideals dominate.
Those who think we should just not interfere in that area of the world only want us to "interfere" where they think we should, areas that of course do NOT include, for example, North Korea, Syria or Iran, and they seem to think we should just let Isreal slide away.

Please do not be so bold as to think that because I disagree with you, I must have not have a valid view point.


I respect you POV, I just don't agree, that's all.
Reply #27 from PolMach Forums Top
"the saudis are scum"?

are you implying that all people in Saudi Arabia are scum?
because if you are, you are acting the same as the terrorists do, you just are on a different side.
terrorists believe that all people in america are scum and heathen, if you believe the same about Saudis, you are going down the path of extremism.
SoundPackager - Customize the Windows sound scheme
Reply #28 from PolMach Forums Top
"areas that do NOT include, of course North Korea, Syria, or Iran"

last I checked, I was in favor of Stopping NK and Iran, and I was seriously looking at Syria.
Reply #30 from JoeUser Forums Top

'NOT what you expect'
No, ABSOLUTELY what I expect from you MM. Yawn.

You are consistent.  Yawn.

Reply #31 from JoeUser Forums Top
I think he said "the Saudis" in the same way terrorist apologists refer to "Americans" with a sneer. At the very least many in America can say we didn't vote for the current administration. People in Saudi Arabia are satisfied to allow totalitarian leaders to make their national statements for them, so one must assume that the Saudi people are cool with the way their government works, or they'd seek to change it.
Reply #32 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: Furry CanaryPosted: Friday, June 24, 2005'NOT what you expect'No, ABSOLUTELY what I expect from you MM. Yawn


glad to please, if this is mrs. canary, hope the grandkid is doing well, if it's mr. canary, well.... hope all is well with you all too.
Reply #33 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: Dr. GuyPosted: Friday, June 24, 2005'NOT what you expect'No, ABSOLUTELY what I expect from you MM. Yawn.You are consistent. Yawn.


yep da canary is one thing, consistant, just like me, of course the canary does not see this.
Reply #34 from JoeUser Forums Top
I think he said "the Saudis" in the same way terrorist apologists refer to "Americans" with a sneer. At the very least many in America can say we didn't vote for the current administration. People in Saudi Arabia are satisfied to allow totalitarian leaders to make their national statements for them, so one must assume that the Saudi people are cool with the way their government works, or they'd seek to change it.


Bakerstreet, some do try to change it, unfortunately speaking out against royalty is illegal in Saudi Arabia. It is also illegal for the press to report on anything that isn't ok'd by the royal family, so even when people do risk life and limb to protest, there is no coverage of the demonstration.... Unless of course, it is a demonstration the government wants to world to see.
Reply #35 from JoeUser Forums Top

yep da canary is one thing, consistant, just like me, of course the canary does not see this.

An honest debater  acknowledges their view and debates from there.  The canary just tries to stir the pot!  Oh well.

Reply #36 from JoeUser Forums Top
35 by ParaTed2k
Saturday, June 25, 2005


Bakerstreet, some do try to change it, unfortunately speaking out against royalty is illegal in Saudi Arabia. It is also illegal for the press to report on anything that isn't ok'd by the royal family, so even when people do risk life and limb to protest, there is no coverage of the demonstration.... Unless of course, it is a demonstration the government wants to world to see.



when I say the saudis I mean the royals, not the people.
Reply #37 from JoeUser Forums Top
36 by Dr. Guy
Saturday, June 25, 2005


yep da canary is one thing, consistant, just like me, of course the canary does not see this.

An honest debater acknowledges their view and debates from there. The canary just tries to stir the pot! Oh well.


and of course me and you never stir da pot...... bahahahahahahahahahahahahah