Brain dead cancer patient kept alive to gestate baby
More questions on medical treatment choices involving life and death
The decision to save mother or child is one that has been used in TV dramas lately -- including ABC's hit show Grey's Anatomy, and I believe in shows like Law and Order, ER and others. In those shows, the choice has been more clear cut, with the mother and father deciding to save the child at all costs, instead of undergoing radical treatment for cancer that would most likely kill the unborn child and only possibly save the child.
Read on for the original article referenced above, and for some additional commentary and thoughts.
Woman is kept alive to save unborn baby
Survival hopes hinge on mom living at least a month more
By Richard Willing
USA TODAY
ARLINGTON, Va. — A 26-year-old pregnant woman with cancer whose brain function ceased last month is being kept alive with a respirator in hopes she can have a very premature baby who has a chance to survive.
Susan Torres, a researcher at the National Institutes of Health (NIH), lost consciousness May 7 when an undiagnosed brain tumor caused a stroke while she dined at home. Her husband, Jason Torres, says doctors told him Susan's brain functions have stopped.
Torres, also 26, says he decided to keep Susan on life support when doctors at Virginia Hospital Center here offered him the chance to disconnect the machines after they determined that she would not recover. He says he believes this is what his wife would have wanted.
A hospital spokesperson did not return calls and e-mails to discuss the case.
Against long odds, the baby Susan was carrying when she was stricken appears to be thriving after nearly 21 weeks of gestation, Torres says. If she can stay alive another month, and the cancer stays away from her uterus, the baby could be delivered and have a chance of surviving, he says. The couple has a 2-year-old son, Peter.
“I hate seeing her on those darned machines,” Torres says, “and I hate using her as a husk, a carrying case, because she herself is worth so much more. But Susan really wanted this baby. And she's a very — how should I put this? — a willful lady. That's probably why she's made it this far.”
Since 1977, at least nine comatose women have given birth in the USA, according to research by the University of Connecticut's medical center. Women with aggressive melanoma, the skin cancer that spread to Susan's brain, have borne children in reported cases in the USA, the United Kingdom and Canada, though not all survived.
Susan's doctors tell Torres they know of no cases in which a brain-dead mother with melanoma has delivered a child, he says.
Torres has quit his job as a commercial printing salesman and has moved into Susan's hospital room. He speaks to his wife, making small talk about the family and letting her know what's on his schedule for the day. For Torres, the routine is something solid to grasp in a life he says “was blown to pieces” nearly six weeks ago and continues to be rocked by aftershocks.
... more at linked article
Interesting case, and I wish for the best for the father and his still unborn offspring.
Honestly, if I faced such a choice and had to help decide between my wife and my unborn child, I don't know what sort of decision I would make. Thankfully, I never had to face such a choice, nor has my wife.
I don't know how I could possibly make the decision for someone else though, and am glad I'm not a judge that might ever have to decide on such an issue. If a fight came before me between say the parents of the mother who wanted their daughter saved and the husband and/or wife who wanted the baby to be saved, I'd have a tough time telling either side that they lost the case. I suppose I would have to side with the husband and wife, but if I faced a Terri Schiavo type case where the wife's wishes weren't clearly known and were only communicated via the husband, it wouldn't be an easy decision.
Again, thoughts and comments are welcome.