Dr Guy Dr Guy

What is longer Than John Kerry's Vietnam Tour?

What is longer Than John Kerry's Vietnam Tour?

And it is not Clinton's Black Book.

Kerry Vietnam tour: 120 Days

Kerry Promised to sign his 180 form: 127 days ago.

And so it goes.

9,330 views 31 replies
Reply #26 Top
I give any and all veterans praise and thanks for their service. When one of them comes back and degrades his and his fellow's service in that war as immoral and illegal and throws away his medals, then tries 30-odd years later to cash in on that service to get elected....well, piss on him and his 180 form, which I'm sure is full of things he'd be hard-pressed to explain away.
Reply #27 Top
Kerry's Vietnam War record is no more, or less, relevant than George W. Bush's National Guard service.

BUT...he DID make the promise to sign the 180...such a fundamental promise, so willingly broken, makes one naturally wonder how many he'd have broken as commander in chief.
Reply #28 Top
Has it occurred to anyone here that 180 is also the number of degrees Kerry's stance on Vietnam took when he was running for president? Just an observation.......

Kerry's Vietnam War record is no more, or less, relevant than George W. Bush's National Guard service.

BUT...he DID make the promise to sign the 180...such a fundamental promise, so willingly broken, makes one naturally wonder how many he'd have broken as commander in chief.


Very true.
Reply #29 Top

I give any and all veterans praise and thanks for their service. When one of them comes back and degrades his and his fellow's service in that war as immoral and illegal and throws away his medals, then tries 30-odd years later to cash in on that service to get elected....well, piss on him and his 180 form, which I'm sure is full of things he'd be hard-pressed to explain away.

Psst.  Wanna know a secret?  He still has not signed it!  He only authorized a limited release of records to the Globe.  No 180 yet!

Reply #30 Top

BUT...he DID make the promise to sign the 180...such a fundamental promise, so willingly broken, makes one naturally wonder how many he'd have broken as commander in chief.

It also makes one wonder what is in there that is so embarassing.

Reply #31 Top

The posters were losing sight of the question, (hey Kerry, where's your 180 already?) and attacking Dr G instead for daring to criticise a veteran.

Better me than some whiny liberal,eh?

WHich also brings up another observation.  It seems that righties read the article before commenting on them, while most lefties do not.  They just assume that the article is attacking one of their prized institutions, and lash back off topic.