I Used To Be a Neocon

Food to touch the Neocon's Soul

http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig6/oneill1.html
Great article by Drew O'Neill. Obviously, I'd like to think that something here would touch someone's soul here, and give you food for thought. I just know that maybe, maybe, maybe some of you will finally, finally, finally wake up and see what the neoconservatives are doing to this country. I always hold out hope....................

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I Used To Be a Neocon
by Drew O'Neill

Two years ago I was a neocon. I supported Bush’s war on Iraq and I called everyone who didn’t a liberal Kool-aid drinker. I voted for Bush in 2000 and I listened to Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity and just about any right-winger on the radio that I could get a four-word talking point from to use against liberals. I would say things such as "liberals won’t defend America," "shut up and sing," "freedom is on the march," and "you’re a great American." I supported the war at first because I bought into the lies and propaganda.

I no longer do. I’m a recovering neocon.

The fact is, the neocon movement is a lot like a cult. I don’t remember how I got so involved and the details are hazy on how I got out. I just woke up one day and said "WTF!" and then ran outside to rip the "bring it on" sticker off of my car bumper. What pulled me in to the neocon cult however was a combination of American nationalism and group mentality. It was a time when questioning the government’s response to Iraq divided you between being with your country and government at a time of need, or against them. I wanted to be with them.

So this cult took me in and I watched Fox News, I bought Factor Gear and I was brainwashed into common reflexes for liberals and dissenters. When I heard dissent in the media over Iraq I’d call it liberal bias. If someone presented me any website that mentioned a "war for oil" or the phrase "illegal war" I would blow the site off as conspiracy hogwash. When someone would talk ill of the President and his march to war, I would call them a liberal and anti-American. When someone would say that Saddam was not a threat after I was done calling them part of the liberal "hate America" crowd, I would launch into a diatribe that Saddam was Hitler-like and hell bent on world domination. If someone persisted I would take out my wild card:

"Saddam believes he’s the reincarnation of King Nebuchadnezzar, and he’s harboring Al Queda!"

I couldn’t believe these liberals. I was outraged. The audacity of them to question our President during a time of war! I listened to similar sentiments on right wing radio while driving to work to reinforce my belief.

Little did I know at the time, but I was an important part of the neocon movement. I was but a tiny wheel in the machine of neoconservatism, but the survival of the neocon agenda depends on millions of us tiny wheels, or it cannot go anywhere. Most of all the neocon agenda depends on a much bigger wheel, the media. For the neocon machine to roll, the big wheel of the media must pull the millions of tiny wheels without the tiny wheels knowing they are being pulled.

This is a difficult trick that requires the media to be an active participant in government deception. To imply that they do so knowingly would be too conspiratorial, and it would be too grand an operation to be plausible. In truth, the mainstream media doesn’t believe they are participating in lies.

During the build-up to the war they were being pulled without knowing it, by the engine of the U. S. government. This swarm of nationalism begat a pro-American media, a complacent media, a lapdog media and a corporate media that to this day will not inform the American public.

When the Bush Administration was found to be creating fake news propaganda for public consumption the media did not inform the public. When the Bush administration marched towards pre-emptive war with Iraq the media was a lapdog instead of a watchdog. When the Bush administration described the assault on the Iraqi public as Shock and Awe, the media used that phrase to scroll alongside the words "War on Terror" without questioning if the assault on Iraq had anything to do with terrorism. When the Bush Administration tore into the U. S. Constitution with the Patriot Act, causing the illegal imprisonment of American citizens while denying them counsel, the media acted more like a timid cocker spaniel than an aggressive Doberman pincher, and failed to defend a sacred American document. When the UK’s Downing Street memo implicated the Bush Administration as being hell bent on a pre-emptive invasion on Iraq before even going to the UN, the American media was silent and once again failed to inform the public.

But the tiny wheels still want to call the media liberal. The tiny wheels still want to say the media isn’t reporting the good things happening in Iraq. Most of all the tiny wheels do not know about the big wheel that’s pulling them. But now I do. That’s why I am an ex-neocon and I am in recovery. It’s more clear to me now than ever that the most American thing one can do is speak out against the actions of their country because it means you love your country.

And in the end it doesn’t matter if we are liberals or conservatives because all that matters is that we are on the side of the U.S. Constitution and of international law. Both of which have been thrown into the toilet by this administration. At least the Qur’an has company.

May 26, 2005

Drew O’Neill [send him mail] graduated from Cal State Northridge and works at an internet marketing company in San Diego, California.
6,788 views 18 replies
Reply #1 Top
Fantastic!

This sounds like my story during the first attack on Iraq.

Well-written and insightful.
Reply #2 Top
Jamie's right, it is well-written and insightful. However, sounds to me like he merely jumped from one bandwagon to the other. That is Mr. O'Neil's right, but how does it make him any different than he was before the jump? Then he looks back at the bandwagon from where he jumped and points his finger at "those sheep". Does a sheep on one cart bleat any different than that same sheep on a different cart?

He kind of reminds me of people who start "dipping" tobacco instead of smoking cigarettes as a means of "quitting smoking". They don't change their addiction in the least, only the route it is taken in. He feels betrayed by those who stir the Kool-Aid of "neocon" thought, so he takes up the ladel of "liberal" thought. Again that is his right, and he does a great job expressing himself, but in the end, is he really joined the side of the US Constitution, or International law? Or merely decided that he gets more warm fuzzies arguing his new found points?

Either way, I wish him well as he joins the Zeal of all Converts.
Reply #3 Top
" ........ but in the end, is he really joined the side of the US Constitution, or International law?"

ABSOLUTELY! And that is what so many supporters of this neocon movement either do not understand or refuse to believe.
Reply #4 Top
ABSOLUTELY! And that is what so many supporters of this neocon movement either do not understand or refuse to believe.


Hmmm, let's see, Prs. Bush obtained the backing of Congress (which, like it or not, satisfied the Constitutional grounds) and there was this thing about a broken ceasefire agreement (which is more than enough to satisfy "international law"). The fact is, neither The Constitution or International Law require the blessing of the UN. So, while you and Mr. O'Neill are well within your rights to feel the way you do, neither the Constitution nor International Law are on your side. Not even "ABSOLUTELY".
Reply #5 Top
Unfortunatley to europe,IMO, the definition of satisfying international law, means satisfying the UN...at least it seems so...
Reply #6 Top
And that is what so many supporters of this neocon movement either do not understand or refuse to believe.


Just as Ted said above, the U.N. isn't the government of the world. The U.N. was involved with Saddam so anything they have to say about the Iraq war is void.
Reply #7 Top
Just as Ted said above, the U.N. isn't the government of the world. The U.N. was involved with Saddam so anything they have to say about the Iraq war is void.


Well-said, ID. Same props to PT2K.
Reply #8 Top
Excellent point, para. In my experience, the liberal camp is just as cultish as are the neocons. That's why I abandoned the left, along with many others I have talked to, and why I remain fiercely Libertarian.

That being said, this piece underscores perfectly the flaws of the neocon camp. Thanks for printing it, dabe.
Reply #9 Top
Thanks, Gid. I know we don't agree on everything, but I'm glad this resonates with you. I felt it was really well written.

Hmmm, let's see, Prs. Bush obtained the backing of Congress


Hmmmmmm...... let's see, Congress is controlled by the republicans. No suprise there. Seems that they want to back their boy no matter what, even if it's the passing of the unconstitutional Patriot Act. As for international law, dubya declared the US to be exempt from international law and any repercussions that may arise from any kind of international protest or legal actions. Hmmmmmmm...... oh yeah, my buddy dubya, one constitutional baby.

the U.N. isn't the government of the world.


Yeah, but for some insane reason, the US seems to think it has become the government of the world. That's the problem. We're not. And, we never will be.
Reply #10 Top
Excellent point, para. In my experience, the liberal camp is just as cultish as are the neocons. That's why I abandoned the left, along with many others I have talked to, and why I remain fiercely Libertarian.


Uhhh...you didn't just join the libertarian cult, did you?
Reply #11 Top
It's funny: I guess I'm a "neocon", but this guy was waaay more hardcore about the whole thing that I ever am. I get this sometimes, hanging out at Protest Warrior events. Some fellow conservative will strike up a conversation with me, and all I can think is, "stop repeating all the talking points, asshat!"

So, yeah. This guy comes across as a bandwagon-jumping loon. He described himself not as a neocon, but as a liberal caricature of a neocon. I'm forced to conclude that either he was never really a neocon, or he's drunk just as deeply from the LLL punchbowl as he ever did from the neocon punchbowl.
Reply #12 Top
Also interesting that he blames "the media" for allowing the neoconjob. Nice twist of irony there.

Otherwise, I find myself in agreement with stutefish - the caricature is too tidy and complete for me to believe the guy ever was what he claims. And if we give him the benefit of the doubt on that score, it bodes poorly for his intellectual capacity to think independently, since all he's done is become a lock/stock/barrel whacko for the other side, rendering his whole "WTF?" revelation pointless, with the sole exception of serving as the trumped up premise for writing the article.

I'm glad it afforded dabe some aid & comfort (sings her favorite tune, after all), but it's for all intents and purposes a throw-away, "I feel so much better about myself" fluff piece (or clever deception). Zero substantive content, zero persuasiveness.

Cheers,
Daiwa
Reply #13 Top
Hmmmmmm...... let's see, Congress is controlled by the republicans. No suprise there. Seems that they want to back their boy no matter what, even if it's the passing of the unconstitutional Patriot Act. As for international law, dubya declared the US to be exempt from international law and any repercussions that may arise from any kind of international protest or legal actions. Hmmmmmmm...... oh yeah, my buddy dubya, one constitutional baby.


The Patriot Act is not unconstitutional.

Also, I was not aware the Constitution applied to "international protests" in other countries.

Your obsessive hatred is blocking any sense of reality.
Reply #14 Top
the caricature is too tidy and complete for me to believe the guy ever was what he claims.


yeah, it may be real, but I wouldn't bet on it. Plus who wakes up one morning, says "WTF!" and rips off their bumper sticker and changes their whole political perspective...
Reply #15 Top
Your obsessive hatred is blocking any sense of reality.


Your blind patriotism is preventing you from doing any research into any of the issues I write about, which keeps you blindingly ignorant. Sheesh, you act like such a stupid kid..........
Reply #16 Top
dabe hopes that some of us will find our souls touched by this, but does anyone here who dabe considers a neocon (just about everyone to the right of Ted Kennedy) feel the least bit unsure of themselves or their beliefs after reading this? What in it, exactly, would give any so-called neocon cause to reflect? Lumping us all together as an evil sounding cabal of "neocons" may serve to desensitize the dabes of the world to our individuality & make it easier to dismiss/hate us, but is irrational on its face.

Cheers,
Daiwa
Reply #17 Top
Your blind patriotism is preventing you from doing any research into any of the issues I write about, which keeps you blindingly ignorant. Sheesh, you act like such a stupid kid..........


You don't write about anything. You make factless allegations and outrageous claims such as the U.S. is a police state. I do research, and that is why people like you and the col are constantly proved wrong with facts.
Reply #18 Top
this story sounds no different than my conversion from the left to the right. I am sure this happens alot dabe, people grow, change
have different thought processes. No I will not change my mind about being a republican, but try to remember not all republicans are conservative, also remember I do not agree with every single decision Bush makes. As a liberal did you agree with everything clinton did? I bet you did not.