Are minimum wages the cause of poor customer service in USA?
from
JoeUser Forums
With apologies to thatoneguyinslc for possibly taking his reply to my thread slamming Best Buy for idiotic practices, I really wanted to expand upon something that was brought up in this reply:
"In the end, you can thank your rightie legislator buddies for keeping the minimum wages down for their corporate donors. People are more likely to be helpful when they make more than seven bucks an hour."
On that surface that reply may make a lot of sense. Low wages = (supposedly) low motivation for employees, and because of that, we -- as customers -- the citizens of the USA are getting bad service when we shop and go out to restaurants and such.
But, is that really the case?
In the case of the business I was complaining about, Best Buy, and many others I could also complain about in the Washington, D.C. metro area, I know for a fact that the wages that the employees are paid are more than "minimum wage". The federal minimum wage is currently stuck at $5.15. Many businesses in the D.C. area can't even get a job applicant to respond if they aren't paying $7 - $9 an hour. While the unemployment rate isn't that much better than the rest of the country, the numbers of people interested in taking jobs that don't leave spending money in their pockets (after taxes, minimum wage jobs certainly don't leave much money in the hand of the employee) are just not that high.
Employers routinely tout higher wages because the local economy has forced them to raise their offers to meet the demands of the supplies they need (labor).
So, in the case I discussed in the original article, I'm facing someone that is likely making that $7 - $9 range per hour, which is better than the individual would get from many other employers (or at least other employers in other areas), and yet I still get to suffer the general poor attitude of the employees that are supposed to be providing service to me (and everyone else).
Would offering these employees another $2 - $20 a hour really provide them more motivation to help customers, or would we simply be over-paying even more for poor service?
Before you shrug off my thoughts here, let me point you to some of the following information:
Scroll down at this link and read the section referenced in the bold type that follows: All Agree — Money Not Most Important Motivator
Contrary to common belief, financial gain is not the primary motivator for entrepreneurs of both genders, according to a new study by Cheskin Research on how men and women run their businesses.
There's an interesting discussion on the topic of motivators here:
Salary is a Fluid Demand
It is widely acknowledged that monetary compensation is not the sole motivator for most prospective employees. However, the World of Work begins to quantify the relative importance of money versus other factors.
Salary is certainly a significant motivator:
However, salary becomes a less compelling factor as the degree of uncertainty about the prospective job increases.
In fact, 29% of the respondents said they would not make a move at all if they felt some uncertainty. In addition,
More here:
Compensating the Sales Force
Five types of salesperson behavior patterns
Any incentive's value depends on
So, I am left to wonder if I'm just finding far too many of the individuals (locally) that would be motivated by more money, or is there a bigger problem where most employees in these jobs are just not putting enough pride in their work efforts, and simply don't care about making sure that customers keep coming back to the establishment that the employees work for?
Is the loss of "work ethic" something that has happened because of something we as customers are not doing, or again, is it more a sign that 'the evil greedy corporations' that most people work for are not doing enough to motivate their employees?
It's hard to imagine that most of these customer service driven businesses are really that out of touch with their customer base. Are we as customers perhaps not doing enough to complain when we receive poor service, and maybe not doing enough to let these businesses know what needs to be fixed so that we'll want to do business with them in the future? If we simply leave a store and never return (or go shop at a competitor consistently instead), does the original business know why we left and won't be back?
"In the end, you can thank your rightie legislator buddies for keeping the minimum wages down for their corporate donors. People are more likely to be helpful when they make more than seven bucks an hour."
On that surface that reply may make a lot of sense. Low wages = (supposedly) low motivation for employees, and because of that, we -- as customers -- the citizens of the USA are getting bad service when we shop and go out to restaurants and such.
But, is that really the case?
In the case of the business I was complaining about, Best Buy, and many others I could also complain about in the Washington, D.C. metro area, I know for a fact that the wages that the employees are paid are more than "minimum wage". The federal minimum wage is currently stuck at $5.15. Many businesses in the D.C. area can't even get a job applicant to respond if they aren't paying $7 - $9 an hour. While the unemployment rate isn't that much better than the rest of the country, the numbers of people interested in taking jobs that don't leave spending money in their pockets (after taxes, minimum wage jobs certainly don't leave much money in the hand of the employee) are just not that high.
Employers routinely tout higher wages because the local economy has forced them to raise their offers to meet the demands of the supplies they need (labor).
So, in the case I discussed in the original article, I'm facing someone that is likely making that $7 - $9 range per hour, which is better than the individual would get from many other employers (or at least other employers in other areas), and yet I still get to suffer the general poor attitude of the employees that are supposed to be providing service to me (and everyone else).
Would offering these employees another $2 - $20 a hour really provide them more motivation to help customers, or would we simply be over-paying even more for poor service?
Before you shrug off my thoughts here, let me point you to some of the following information:
Scroll down at this link and read the section referenced in the bold type that follows: All Agree — Money Not Most Important Motivator
Contrary to common belief, financial gain is not the primary motivator for entrepreneurs of both genders, according to a new study by Cheskin Research on how men and women run their businesses.
There's an interesting discussion on the topic of motivators here:
Salary is a Fluid Demand
It is widely acknowledged that monetary compensation is not the sole motivator for most prospective employees. However, the World of Work begins to quantify the relative importance of money versus other factors.
Salary is certainly a significant motivator:
- 23% of respondents would switch to an equivalent job at a new employer for a 10-19% salary increase;
- 34% would switch for a 20-29% increase.
However, salary becomes a less compelling factor as the degree of uncertainty about the prospective job increases.
In fact, 29% of the respondents said they would not make a move at all if they felt some uncertainty. In addition,
- only 11% would move for a 10-19% salary increase;
- and only 21% would move for a 20-29% increase.
More here:
Compensating the Sales Force
Five types of salesperson behavior patterns
- Some are "Creatures of habit." Money does not motivate either way
- Some are motivated toward goals regardless of money
- Some work just enough to keep their jobs
- Some work to balance time between income generation and income consumption
- Certain salespeople have an insatiable appetite for money. They will try to earn as much as they can.
Any incentive's value depends on
- The personal characteristics of the person to whom it is offered
- The degree to which it is needed or wanted
- The absolute value of the incentive
- How this incentive interacts with other incentives that might be aimed at other needs
- The perceived organizational environment
So, I am left to wonder if I'm just finding far too many of the individuals (locally) that would be motivated by more money, or is there a bigger problem where most employees in these jobs are just not putting enough pride in their work efforts, and simply don't care about making sure that customers keep coming back to the establishment that the employees work for?
Is the loss of "work ethic" something that has happened because of something we as customers are not doing, or again, is it more a sign that 'the evil greedy corporations' that most people work for are not doing enough to motivate their employees?
It's hard to imagine that most of these customer service driven businesses are really that out of touch with their customer base. Are we as customers perhaps not doing enough to complain when we receive poor service, and maybe not doing enough to let these businesses know what needs to be fixed so that we'll want to do business with them in the future? If we simply leave a store and never return (or go shop at a competitor consistently instead), does the original business know why we left and won't be back?