Not a Confederate Flag

Ban the Massachuttes State Flag!

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,157134,00.html
from JoeUser Forums

140 years after blacks were freed, 120 years since the last major Indian battles, the lone bastion of racism is finally being taken down.

Is this some backwater truckstop in Mississippi or Alabama?  No.  Is this come long forgotten Jim Crow berg in Georgia? No.

Is this some racist facist neo-con podunk ignorant southern white trash town?

No.

It is Boston Massachusettes.  Where for the last 330 years, no Indian has been allowed to legally walk in Boston.  How did these racial purist determine an indian?  Must have been from the color of the skin as they did not set a law that says if you are '1/32' Indian, you are indian.

This, the home of 2 of the most liberal senators in congress, the home of Barney Frank, the only State to Vote for McGovern in 72, this liberal bastion is being shown for the small minded bigotted little burg it is.

As a long standing member of the Mattaponi Indian Tribe, I declare the state Flag of Massachusettes to be a symbol of racism and hatred.  And all who display it are racists sexist Nazi Facist Homophobe bigots.

Shun them, for they are evil.  Shun any who support them for they are evil as well.

Shun War Criminal (by his own mouth) Kerry and murderer Kennedy and all the racist bigots in Massachusettes!

To do less is to support them and be a racist yourself.

politics
5,177 views 23 replies
Reply #1 from JoeUser Forums Top
You have been warned!  Heed the warning, or be forever labeled with a Scarlet R.
Reply #2 from JoeUser Forums Top
Man, you'd think that with the problems we face as a nation today, activists of any ilk would have better things to do with their time than researching archaic laws that havent been enforced for centuries and making a big freaking deal out of them.


Apparently our law makers have fixed all the other problems in our lives, so now they get to worry about fixing the problems of the past. ;~D
Fences - Organize your desktop icons today!
Reply #3 from JoeUser Forums Top

Man, you'd think that with the problems we face as a nation today, activists of any ilk would have better things to do with their time than researching archaic laws that havent been enforced for centuries and making a big freaking deal out of them.

The fact that the neocon fascists of Massachusettes refused to address this travesty for 300 years shows that they are a bunch of racists!

Reply #4 from JoeUser Forums Top

Apparently our law makers have fixed all the other problems in our lives, so now they get to worry about fixing the problems of the past. ;~D

Maybe they just did not want to fix the problem.  And it is only the shame of the scarlet R that pushed them into it this time!

Reply #5 from JoeUser Forums Top
Man, you'd think that with the problems we face as a nation today, activists of any ilk would have better things to do with their time than researching archaic laws that havent been enforced for centuries and making a big freaking deal out of them.

Must be a slow news day in Massachusets.


Spoken like a true white supremist. Fact is, the law was on the books. Fact was, although it has not been enforced for centuries, the Native Americans wanted it off the books. How could you blame them? Eeeerrrrrrr......... leave that to whitey whipsy.

As for the original intent of this article, hardly worth commenting on, other than to point out that it's reactionary hyperbolic nonsense. Whatever you think about the MA flag does not negate the controversy surrounding the confederate flag. Anyone who displays the confed flag shouldn't be all agaga because they are steeped in controversy. To think otherwise is indicative of having one's head up one's ass.
Reply #6 from JoeUser Forums Top
Spoken like a true white supremist. Fact is, the law was on the books. Fact was, although it has not been enforced for centuries, the Native Americans wanted it off the books. How could you blame them? Eeeerrrrrrr......... leave that to whitey whipsy.

As for the original intent of this article, hardly worth commenting on, other than to point out that it's reactionary hyperbolic nonsense. Whatever you think about the MA flag does not negate the controversy surrounding the confederate flag. Anyone who displays the confed flag shouldn't be all agaga because they are steeped in controversy. To think otherwise is indicative of having one's head up one's ass.


You are treading dangerously close to be turned in to admin yet again.
Reply #7 from JoeUser Forums Top
I guess dabe hatefests are acceptable here, but any dissent from the jingo ranks here isn't. Is that it, drmiler? Talk about double standards............
Reply #8 from JoeUser Forums Top
I guess dabe hatefests are acceptable here, but any dissent from the jingo ranks here isn't. Is that it, drmiler? Talk about double standards............


I do not partcipate in your so called "hatefests". And a hatefest is a far cry from your usual swearing. Which is where you were starting to go, yet again. With you it starts as name calling (white supremist, whitey whipsy) and then degenerates into swearing.
Reply #9 from JoeUser Forums Top
Wow, it's incredible how EVERYTHING is about Dabe. Simply amazing.
Reply #10 from JoeUser Forums Top
EVERYTHING is about Dabe.


Only cause people let it be... Ignore her and maybe she will go away....
Reply #11 from JoeUser Forums Top
Only cause people let it be... Ignore her and maybe she will go away....


That has been tried and it does not work.
Reply #12 from JoeUser Forums Top
Frankly, I have no intention of leaving. And, I wish to hell you all (dipsy, modnotman & drmiler particularly) would stop constantly making this about me. You post your points. I post mine. I get vilified. then, I get more vilified for responding to the dabe bashing, then you complain that "it's about me". Get real.......
Reply #13 from JoeUser Forums Top
Frankly, I have no intention of leaving. And, I wish to hell you all (dipsy, modnotman & drmiler particularly) would stop constantly making this about me. You post your points. I post mine. I get vilified. then, I get more vilified for responding to the dabe bashing, then you complain that "it's about me". Get real.......


YOU get real! First off you were NOT getting bashed and there was NO hatefest. And secondly if you don't like the way people respond to you posts, might I suggest that you change the tone of your posts. You have been told this numerous times by more than a few people on this list including admin. Stop the name calling and the swearing and you'd be surprised how people treat you.
Reply #14 from JoeUser Forums Top
I don't believe you one stinkin' bit. When I first started posting here, I nicely and rather naively began posting some political stuff that was important to me. It didn't take long for you jingo nationalists to come and insult and bash me every time I hit the keyboard. Granted, I was over the top when whipsy posted that Teresa cookie article. Frankly, that one's pure nonsense just stunned me. Swearing and namecalling is just my reaction to your, and your lying righie buddies' venom, lying and hate. GET FREAKIN' REAL!
Reply #15 from JoeUser Forums Top
YOU get real! First off you were NOT getting bashed and there was NO hatefest.


Yet another lie by our lying drmiler. Just ask whipsy, modman, and few others here. One of modman's was removed from the board because it was a hateful article about me, using my name in the title. Frankly, I really don't care if you don't like me. My self esteem is not predicated on you and your buddies opinion of me. But, now that I mention it, maybe it's even bolstered by it. But, what I really hate is that there is clearly and without a doubt a double standard her in jingoland. You're blind to it because, well, you're blind to most everything.
Reply #16 from JoeUser Forums Top
I don't believe you one stinkin' bit. When I first started posting here, I nicely and rather naively began posting some political stuff that was important to me. It didn't take long for you jingo nationalists to come and insult and bash me every time I hit the keyboard. Granted, I was over the top when whipsy posted that Teresa cookie article. Frankly, that one's pure nonsense just stunned me. Swearing and namecalling is just my reaction to your, and your lying righie buddies' venom, lying and hate. GET FREAKIN' REAL!


I've said this before and I'll say it again. Would you like me to start reposting all the crap you've spewed at JU? I can as I have saved off each and every one of them. And if you want to get technical about it...YOUR the one that started the crap on this thread! No one else! SO YOU GET FREAKING REAL!
Reply #17 from JoeUser Forums Top
I can as I have saved off each and every one of them.


You saved all my posts? I'm flattered.
Reply #18 from JoeUser Forums Top
Swearing and namecalling is just my reaction to your, and your lying righie buddies' venom


I would tend to say that this stems from your own poor ability to control your temper.
Reply #19 from JoeUser Forums Top
I can as I have saved off each and every one of them.


You saved all my posts? I'm flattered.


I wouldn't be if I was you. They weren't saved to make nice-nice!
Reply #20 from JoeUser Forums Top
No, I imagine not. Just your sicko attempt to drive me off this site. Amazing. You actually saved my posts. Talk about obsessive...... Past posts won't work, however. As I was warned by one of the moderators, and I have been heeding her warning, you're shit out of luck on this score. I'm here. Get used to it.
Reply #21 from JoeUser Forums Top
I have been heeding her warning, you're shit out of luck on this score. I'm here. Get used to it.


Actually NO you haven't:


Reply By: dabe Posted: Friday, May 20, 2005

And who woulda thought you were as fucking ugly as your personality.


Just so you know that I'm not just jerking your chain.


Spoken like a true white supremist. Fact is, the law was on the books. Fact was, although it has not been enforced for centuries, the Native Americans wanted it off the books. How could you blame them? Eeeerrrrrrr......... leave that to whitey whipsy.

As for the original intent of this article, hardly worth commenting on, other than to point out that it's reactionary hyperbolic nonsense. Whatever you think about the MA flag does not negate the controversy surrounding the confederate flag. Anyone who displays the confed flag shouldn't be all agaga because they are steeped in controversy. To think otherwise is indicative of having one's head up one's ass.


Now you want to tell me again who started the sh*t storm on this thread?
Reply #22 from JoeUser Forums Top
I wish to hell you all


--I hope not I...

I nicely and rather naively began posting some political stuff that was important to me. It didn't take long for you jingo nationalists to come and insult and bash me every time


--You do realise that this will happen, look at the majority here, they are rightwinged,you and your beliefs are not, so about 75% of the time you are going to run the chance of bashhing..

--being blind/ignorant of things can be a good thing...
Reply #23 from JoeUser Forums Top
What was this article about again? Uhhh...oh yeah, law in Boston about Indians not being allowed to walk there. Frankly, who cares? I bet if I looked hard enough I could find a law that forbids me from walking somewhere in New Jersey. It's not like they regularly enforce it.