California Ballot Proposal

Forming their own Border Patrol

from JoeUser Forums
The People of California tired of all the Illegal aliens have decided to try and do something about it.

There is a ballot proposal going around now, asking that the state form its own border patrol.

We need 600,000 signatures to get this to the voters, I for one am sure this will pass, as californians are tired of the rampant crime here.

Even if it does pass, I am sure some idiot liberal activist judge will strike it down as being unconstitutional, time will tell.

I will keep you all informed about this as it develops.
politics
4,070 views 13 replies
Reply #1 from JoeUser Forums Top
The People of California tired of all the Illegal aliens have decided to try and do something about it.

If they are really serious they will dump their Governor, who is a legal alien(in the true sense of the word) but one that has a very shady past...
Reply #2 from JoeUser Forums Top
Good luck to you.  I wonder how the family will vote........
Galactic Civilizations IV
Reply #3 from PolMach Forums Top
I always thought Liberal Judges were disliked by I think Conservitives because they sometimes would pass things that go above the Constitution, and ConservitiveJudges are strict on anything no matter the situation.
Reply #4 from JoeUser Forums Top
1 by Manopeace
Thursday, May 05, 2005


The People of California tired of all the Illegal aliens have decided to try and do something about it.

If they are really serious they will dump their Governor, who is a legal alien(in the true sense of the word) but one that has a very shady past...


nothing but allagation mano, that just happened to surface during the recall election and went away immediatly. arnold is a good govener and a good man that gave up 30 million a year to serve the people of california for a paltry 175, 000 salary.
Reply #5 from JoeUser Forums Top
#2 by Dr. Guy
Thursday, May 05, 2005


Good luck to you. I wonder how the family will vote........


I will lay odds it passes by at least 65%
Reply #6 from JoeUser Forums Top
3 by bigstive
Thursday, May 05, 2005


always thought Liberal Judges were disliked by I think Conservitives because they sometimes would pass things that go above the Constitution, and ConservitiveJudges are strict on anything no matter the situation.


the liberal judges here in california have struck down to many laws passed by the people, the law in 1993 denying welfare and medical aid to ILLEGAL aliens passed by a whoping 65% and was struck down and just trecently another liberal activist judge struck down the california definition of marrage also passes by the people as unconstitutional. there is no mention of marrage and how it should appear in the constitution btw
Reply #7 from JoeUser Forums Top
slight update, since the inception of this proposed new action, Arnold is now being labeled a racist by the democrats. WHATS wrong with these people? Is there no low the democratic party will sink to?
Reply #8 from JoeUser Forums Top
liberal judges here in california have struck down to many laws passed by the people, the law in 1993 denying welfare and medical aid to ILLEGAL aliens passed by a whoping 65% and was struck down


Being as it is the duty of the Judiciary to UPHOLD the law of the land, these types of judges should be summarily removed from the bench. Shooting is of course optional. The key word in that is ILLEGAL aliens. That alone disqualifies these people from receiving any benefits from a common sense standpoint alone.

These judges not only defy the will of the people, (remember that catchy little line "of the people, by the people, and for the people?) but they also disregard the law in order to propogate their politics. This should not only be disqualification from the bench but also a prosecutable offense.
Reply #9 from JoeUser Forums Top

slight update, since the inception of this proposed new action, Arnold is now being labeled a racist by the democrats. WHATS wrong with these people? Is there no low the democratic party will sink to?

1, he is a republican, so they tried to label him a nazi (jewish groups rallied to his side on that one).

2, he is effective, so he must be eeevill!

3, They are bereft of ideas, so what do you expect?

Sorry, if you are Republican and effective, you are evil and have to be something not right.  Liberal rul e #3 (check out Tom Delay)

Reply #10 from JoeUser Forums Top

These judges not only defy the will of the people, (remember that catchy little line "of the people, by the people, and for the people?) but they also disregard the law in order to propogate their politics. This should not only be disqualification from the bench but also a prosecutable offense.

Whoa!  Another insightful!  You are moving up fast.  Bakerstreet better watch out or you will be the new object of hate from the loony left!

Reply #11 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: Dr. GuyPosted: Thursday, May 05, 2005slight update, since the inception of this proposed new action, Arnold is now being labeled a racist by the democrats. WHATS wrong with these people? Is there no low the democratic party will sink to?1, he is a republican, so they tried to label him a nazi (jewish groups rallied to his side on that one).2, he is effective, so he must be eeevill!3, They are bereft of ideas, so what do you expect?Sorry, if you are Republican and effective, you are evil and have to be something not right. Liberal rul e #3 (check out Tom Delay)


sad as this is, it's the truth. but arnold is a rino. republican.
Reply #12 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: Dr. GuyPosted: Thursday, May 05, 2005These judges not only defy the will of the people, (remember that catchy little line "of the people, by the people, and for the people?) but they also disregard the law in order to propogate their politics. This should not only be disqualification from the bench but also a prosecutable offense.Whoa! Another insightful! You are moving up fast. Bakerstreet better watch out or you will be the new object of hate from the loony left!


he is pretty bright is he not? fast on the responses too.
Reply #13 from JoeUser Forums Top
Reply By: MasonMPosted: Thursday, May 05, 2005liberal judges here in california have struck down to many laws passed by the people, the law in 1993 denying welfare and medical aid to ILLEGAL aliens passed by a whoping 65% and was struck down Being as it is the duty of the Judiciary to UPHOLD the law of the land, these types of judges should be summarily removed from the bench. Shooting is of course optional. The key word in that is ILLEGAL aliens. That alone disqualifies these people from receiving any benefits from a common sense standpoint alone.These judges not only defy the will of the people, (remember that catchy little line "of the people, by the people, and for the people?) but they also disregard the law in order to propogate their politics. This should not only be disqualification from the bench but also a prosecutable offense.


it's real difficult to get these "lifetime" appointies out of their positions