ARE JUDGES REALLY ABOVE THE LAW?
Are Your Basic Liberty Rights Protected Under The Constitution In Family Law Court ?
from 
JoeUser Forums
JoeUser Forums
PRINCE ALBERT WEBBER IV IS PUT BACK IN HIS CAN
Macon County Family Court Judge Albert G. Webber has finally been removed from a highly contested case in which two minor children were allegedly sold to non parents. On April 14, 2005, Amy Joan Schneider removed her case from Judge Webber’s Decatur Illinois Court and filed her Notice and Complaint at the Federal District Courthouse in Peoria Illinois.
Schneider, a 38 year old Normal Illinois mother of five, has previously filed complaints against Webber claiming racial bias and violations of her parental due process rights under the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Judge Webber is openly duplicitous and has completely ignored his sworn judicial obligations under Illinois Statute, Schneider said.
On April 7, 2005, David Martin Price of the General Security Services Corporation of Topeka, Kansas personally served Judge Webber, and two other circuit court judges, with a summons and complaint. Mr. Price also personally served several lawyers on that same day. “Prince Albert got put back in his can because he is not above the law,” said Mr. Price.
Court records show on April 21, 2005, Webber issued an order granting a “sanctions” judgment against Amy Joan Schneider in an amount exceeding $45,000. “Just reading this last order tells me that Judge Webber has possibly ‘flipped out,’” says Attorney Thurman R. 7825921 of the On-Line Legal Rescue Team and Court Reform Advocacy Committee. “Looking toward a federal court proceeding, three things in Judge Webber’s orders really jump out at me,” said Thurman.
1) After Notice of Removal Judge Webber’s April 19, 2005 evidentiary hearing and April 21, 2005, order were barred, by the explicit language of 28 U.S.C.A. § 1446(e);
2) Illinois guardianship[s] are temporary, and may be challenged at virtually any time; “relitigation” of a continuing issue is not possible, plus record fails to show the trial Court’s response to the natural Parent’s Petition for Guardianship of her children; and,
3) The March 30, 2004, Illinois Fourth District Appellate Court Opinion precisely did not exclude the mother as guardian or direct the trial court to appoint “Karen Coates (Amy's sister) as successor guardian.”
I thank God for the loving support of my friends and family, I will continue to fight, says Schneider. I will prove my constitutional complaint in Federal Court, Schneider proclaims.
# # #
Link
Macon County Family Court Judge Albert G. Webber has finally been removed from a highly contested case in which two minor children were allegedly sold to non parents. On April 14, 2005, Amy Joan Schneider removed her case from Judge Webber’s Decatur Illinois Court and filed her Notice and Complaint at the Federal District Courthouse in Peoria Illinois.
Schneider, a 38 year old Normal Illinois mother of five, has previously filed complaints against Webber claiming racial bias and violations of her parental due process rights under the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Judge Webber is openly duplicitous and has completely ignored his sworn judicial obligations under Illinois Statute, Schneider said.
On April 7, 2005, David Martin Price of the General Security Services Corporation of Topeka, Kansas personally served Judge Webber, and two other circuit court judges, with a summons and complaint. Mr. Price also personally served several lawyers on that same day. “Prince Albert got put back in his can because he is not above the law,” said Mr. Price.
Court records show on April 21, 2005, Webber issued an order granting a “sanctions” judgment against Amy Joan Schneider in an amount exceeding $45,000. “Just reading this last order tells me that Judge Webber has possibly ‘flipped out,’” says Attorney Thurman R. 7825921 of the On-Line Legal Rescue Team and Court Reform Advocacy Committee. “Looking toward a federal court proceeding, three things in Judge Webber’s orders really jump out at me,” said Thurman.
1) After Notice of Removal Judge Webber’s April 19, 2005 evidentiary hearing and April 21, 2005, order were barred, by the explicit language of 28 U.S.C.A. § 1446(e);
2) Illinois guardianship[s] are temporary, and may be challenged at virtually any time; “relitigation” of a continuing issue is not possible, plus record fails to show the trial Court’s response to the natural Parent’s Petition for Guardianship of her children; and,
3) The March 30, 2004, Illinois Fourth District Appellate Court Opinion precisely did not exclude the mother as guardian or direct the trial court to appoint “Karen Coates (Amy's sister) as successor guardian.”
I thank God for the loving support of my friends and family, I will continue to fight, says Schneider. I will prove my constitutional complaint in Federal Court, Schneider proclaims.
# # #
Link
PolMach Forums