" so, Reiki-House, what you are saying is you have absolutely no respect for rule of law. You refuse to recognize the United State's right to enforce a ceasefire agreement by returning to hostilities with the government that broke it; you call the vet a "loser"; then you go ahead and call for open vigilanism! No, you are the pathetic one!!"
You may stoop to a lower level if you wish sir. Trying to loop one event in with another, which in this case can't be done. You're talking about rule of law. I'm talking about personal honor and setting things straight. And you can stuff the legality aspect in the garbage bin along with your rule of law sentiment. Let's not play like kids here. There is no room for mindless childlike fodder when we're discussing something this important. The law and order mindset is put in your head at a young age. You apparently still have it in your system. Rules and laws. You're attacking me with a lawful society argument when the only evidence you could possible muster is anything having to do with the American judicial system? You see, you're problem is that you're arguing what you've been taught. That criminals get caught and sentened to jail therefore justice is served. That all men are created equal(load a crap when you see how some nations treat other nations), that society's authorities protect you, and if some harm comes to you, the ones who harmed you will be found, arrested, sent to court, sentenced to jail, then serves his time, and is paroled possibly early for good behavior. And when you think that simplistically, you're actually saying there's no problem with Michael Jackson's decade-earlier child rape charges were dropped after he paid a multi-million cash gift to his accuser. Hey that's part of the wheeling and dealing American judicial system, right? You can legally pay an accuser lots of money in return for them dropping the very real charges based on very real pedophelia facts. Facts because he has a history of the same child molesting crap following him. Is that a coincidence? Don't ever use law and order as an argument with me when you have a multi-tier system which favors those with money. You have money, you can buy your freedom. That's what I should bow down to? Never. It is not vigilanteism to satisfy one's own personal honor. You can easily argue it is, and it's an obvious immediate reaction. To me a vigilante is someone who takes justice into his own hands after his societies' judicial system made total fun of him and humiliated him in front of lots of influential people. Your daughter is raped. The accused is obviously guilty. He has connections. His family supports him by financing his lawyers. He gets either off on the charge, or he gets minimal minimal jail time. He now knows law and order DOESN'T actually defend him when he's wronged. He now knows law and order DOESN'T punish the guilty when guilt is outright and fully visible. So he goes and kills the rapist or hopefully tortures him in any which way he likes, as he sees fit. THAT is the vigilante. This clown veteran is a vigilante in your mind? Not at all to me. He's a weak minded probably heavy alcohol or drug abuser who has allowed 30 years to pass before he had the sense to do something about it. Like I said before, it's not honor or revenge when all you do is unknowingly humiliate and completely embarass you and your entire family in front of the world, for it WAS international news. What a joke. So don't trust in law and order to protect you. It and they won't. Don't trust things to be set right when you've been life-altering seriously maimed or injured deliberately. Police don't and won't protect you, but 10,000 of them will protect a Republican convention with a few thousand of them to protect. What's that? a 3 or 4 to 1 ratio? 10,000 cops. And they were well used. They abused people who want their voices to be heard. That's freedom isn't it? It's not lawful for politicans to hear the restless anger pervading the middle and lower classes of America? They need to have 10,000 cops on hand, meanwhile the criminals are killing and stealing since anyone knows 10,000 cops in one area leaves a big gap exposing the American people who most likely believe in the bogus law and order fodder as you do. Don't trust if someone says they had extra cops to fill in some of the void. The temporary cops are trainees and men not prepared to act as real police officers. They are inexperienced and do not cover and protect their assigned areas as if they were veterans you would trust to care for your family, to defend and protect and help you should the need arise.
Law and order, people, is something continuously mentioned in books when you were young, as a sort of indoctrination, setting your thinking in order, and it continues even when you get into secondary school and beyond. You simply can't trust in something so bias, so duplicit, so filled with universally-known corruption, to protect you. Someone takes his dick and puts it into your young child's anus, society isn't going to help you achieve the discourse where personal honor would be satisfied. And that's only if you as a parent even find out about it. I've read cases where the faggot cop or other authority figure molester tells the little boy not to tell anyone or else his parents will go to jail or something will happen to them. This little boy's indoctrinated trust in the system prevented him from telling anyone since he was old enough to know the acts were wrong, he wasn't old enough to know how the justice system worked. He feared it so didn't want his folks to go to jail. I think we all think rapists or at least multiple rapists deserve to die for their crimes. I'm one of the few who advocate real justice though. But it's not lonely. Tons of people every day discover the system is designed not for our benefit but for the benefit of a small minority of others. That's the way it is.
JoeUser Forums
