Moderateman Moderateman

President Bush and the Liberal Lunatics

President Bush and the Liberal Lunatics

There just is no winning For Bush.

I wonder if the term, No win situation” was invented by some moronic drunken liberal.

Examples to follow:

Bush sides with Vicente fox and calls the minutemen of Arizona, vigilantes <

Liberals scenario number 1. Bush is failing to do his job.

Liberal scenario number 2, Bush expels Illegal aliens and blockades the border, Bush is a racist pig and hates Mexicans

Bush retaliates for the attack on the world trade center,

Liberal scenario number one, Bush is a warmonger,

He does NOT retaliate; Bush is a coward and has betrayed his country.

Bush declares all people want freedom.

Liberal scenario number 1, Bush is crazy and cannot force democracy down anyone’s throat.

After successful elections liberals declare, it was not really an election.


Bush cuts taxes FOR All AMERICANS,

Liberal scenario number 1, liberals declare tax cuts for the rich will not help anything.

Economy rises and liberals declare tax cuts had nothing to do with it.

I am sure there are many more such example of the twisted minds of the far left, and how they relate to President Bush, seems like NO MATTER what he does the many mouths of liberals will find some way to make him wrong.

If the far left thinks AMERICANS CANNOT FIGURE OUT WHAT THEY DO, THE LIBERALS ARE DOOMED TO REPEAT THERE MISTAKES, lose more power, lose more respect and finally lose all credibility {if they have not lost it already}
10,616 views 46 replies
Reply #26 Top
Reply By: drmilerPosted: Saturday, April 02, 2005"Shut your ignorant pie-hole! And BTW I'd get a refund on that ACLU card if I was you. Which I'm glad I'm not!"As you are obviously far too stupid to appreciate the way things really are, I will educate you. Your redneck reply only reinforces the patent fact that you - are indeed one dumb, ignorant SOB! Why would a grown man worship a political party? He must be weak in the mind would be the only answer I can come uop with; it must be becasue he is programmed like a sheep, to follow the herd. It is sad, but true that the man has brainwashed rednecks such as yourself into being racists, so that you will not frown upon your lowly "have not" status; do you enjoy licking the man's boot? Free your mind, fool!Hey MM, looks like we have another chicken choking liberal on our hands! Also looks like they don't have the brains required to pour pee out of a boot with insructions on the sole!


I will help "it" take boot off foot, turn upsides down, let urine flow into a proper receptacle,{cup or glass} your choice, slowly bring to lips, drink deeply, you idiot, repeat as necessary.......... there how is that doc, some simple instructions for the simpleminded left.
Reply #27 Top
Reply By: The Right DishPosted: Sunday, April 03, 2005"If the far left thinks AMERICANS CANNOT FIGURE OUT WHAT THEY DO, THE LIBERALS ARE DOOMED TO REPEAT THERE MISTAKES, lose more power, lose more respect and finally lose all credibility {if they have not lost it already}"I utterly concur. Nice article.


ahhhhhhh thank you!
Reply #28 Top
Reply By: Reiki-HousePosted: Sunday, April 03, 2005"Bush is a warmonger"


try to keep this thought in mind while whiling your way throught life on the billion dollar a day trade you do with this warmonger.
Reply #29 Top
Reply By: MythicalMinoPosted: Sunday, April 03, 2005"Bush is a warmonger"Why is this part of your argument? I'm pretty sure it was Bush himself who, when asked a question in reference to the supposed war on terror, called himself a war president. "I'm a war president" is his exact words. How does Bush himself saying it put the liberals in a bad light?I think a problem in America is the bulls**t having to do with bias and labelling. Sorry armchair warhawks, but saying negative things about the complete disaster in Iraq has nothing to do with liberalism. Or anti-Americanism, or patriotism. Only the truth. The labelling game works well when you're arguing for something so obviously wrong. When you're on the defensive, of course you need to label someone, because once you label someone in your defective mind, you cease to seriously listen to anything that person says ever. And that's kind of dumb. Why does the US shooting up entire families in Iraq, and my denouncing it, make me the left wing or liberal or whatever. I'm simply the messenger. And you hawks know it too. That's why the war crime video clip, the absolutely murderous one, never got one comment at all. How can anyone who supports the illegal war in Iraq make any kind of comment about what the video had shown them? Supporters can't because then they have to accept the cold hard realities of actuality, and that they cannot do, not yet. So they ignore it as if ignoring something makes them not to be true. Like the head in the sand concept.huh?


you get an insitefull, for a proper response to that rubbish.
Reply #30 Top
Reply By: Dr. GuyPosted: Sunday, April 03, 2005As you are obviously far too stupid to appreciate the way things really are, I will educate you. Your redneck reply only reinforces the patent fact that you - are indeed one dumb, ignorant SOB! Why would a grown man worship a political party? He must be weak in the mind would be the only answer I can come uop with; it must be becasue he is programmed like a sheep, to follow the herd. It is sad, but true that the man has brainwashed rednecks such as yourself into being racists, so that you will not frown upon your lowly "have not" status; do you enjoy licking the man's boot? Free your mind, fool!You know the difference between you and SPM? He at least has intelligent things to say, albeit in a beligerant and arrogant way. You simply spew hate and then discard any opposing view points with slurs and slander as you have no rationale or facts to support your 'feel'ings.in short, you are the epitomy of a bigot. You may even be a redneck. Only you hide yourself behind anonymity. Like the small minded bigot you are.


I do not think so doc, there is a command of the queens english in its posts/.
Reply #31 Top
Reply By: ParaTed2kPosted: Sunday, April 03, 2005((((Ye Olde DisclaimerAwww, take all the fun out of the satirical ones!!! ;~D


but ted ya gotta love the sheer freedom of not having to coddle the whiney bleeding hearts here.
Reply #32 Top
Reply By: Tarantula-X (Bob's devoted daughter)(Anonymous User)Posted: Sunday, April 03, 2005"I don't smell SPM's brand of stink on this.'Crusty old man, the only thing you smell is the stink of your rotting grey-skin.


and there is proof, you can change your name but you cannot disguise the stench of stupidity and bigotry.
Reply #33 Top
Reply By: Dr. GuyPosted: Sunday, April 03, 2005Yes, he's a laugh riot, while I am not. I sure you feel the same, except when SPM hits a sore spot; one that is close to home, then, of course, you become outraged. Spare us the sanctimony. Dr. Guy, why are you lap dog for the republican machine? For the man in general?Spare us your sanctimony?you are a laugh riot! I spent a day in a sparring match with Sir Petey! It was enjoyable and rewarding! And no blood was shed!You obviously dont know me one whit, nor yourself. I am no republican lap dog! Just ask any liberal on this forum who has READ my stuff! I am a conservative and I make no bones about that!But you? You have no facts, and indeed no logic! Just an unbridled hatred for that which you do not control! you say "the man", and yet you know nothing of which you speak. Your ignorance is your calling card. hate is your only weapon. And no one is going to defend your hate.You are a sad pathetic little troll. Whose only pleasure is in insult without justification. You cannot be hated, only pitied.


ooooooooooo i JUST LOVE IT WHEN YA GET ALL PROPER AND HUFFY DOC......
Reply #34 Top
Reply By: little_whipPosted: Sunday, April 03, 2005btw, folks, I don't think this little troll is SPM, DSH, or WF. Reminds me of kingbee, playing a big ol' joke on us, or Myrr attempting to do the same. Problem is, I'd find one funny and the other not so.


I am sure myrr would not come here under the cloud of darkness and "dis my blog he and I disagree.. alot.. but he never ambushes me, never.. he comes straight at me, guns blazing.
Reply #35 Top
Reply By: Tarantula-X (Bob's devoted daughter)(Anonymous User)Posted: Sunday, April 03, 2005"Problem is, I'd find one funny and the other not so."Selective irrationality is nothing to be proud of. Why do defend Bush and the war? He's a billionaire,


and you are an idiot, President bush was and is the poorset of the 4 candidates in the last election, hanoijohn kerry worth over a billion, john edwards upwards of 150 million, dick cheny, about 35 million and President bush comes in a distant last with about 12 million. get your facts right. Idiotchild
Reply #36 Top
Reply By: drmilerPosted: Saturday, April 02, 2005"Shut your ignorant pie-hole! And BTW I'd get a refund on that ACLU card if I was you. Which I'm glad I'm not!"As you are obviously far too stupid to appreciate the way things really are, I will educate you. Your redneck reply only reinforces the patent fact that you - are indeed one dumb, ignorant SOB! Why would a grown man worship a political party? He must be weak in the mind would be the only answer I can come uop with; it must be becasue he is programmed like a sheep, to follow the herd. It is sad, but true that the man has brainwashed rednecks such as yourself into being racists, so that you will not frown upon your lowly "have not" status; do you enjoy licking the man's boot? Free your mind, fool!Hey MM, looks like we have another chicken choking liberal on our hands! Also looks like they don't have the brains required to pour pee out of a boot with insructions on the sole!


I will help "it" take boot off foot, turn upsides down, let urine flow into a proper receptacle,{cup or glass} your choice, slowly bring to lips, drink deeply, you idiot, repeat as necessary.......... there how is that doc, some simple instructions for the simpleminded left.


There ya go again MM, assuming! Your assuming (incorrectly of course) that this simple-minded fool can even read.
Reply #37 Top
There ya go again MM, assuming! Your assuming (incorrectly of course) that this simple-minded fool can even read.


dang doc, ya got me.... mm clutches chest falls over THUD!
Reply #38 Top
There ya go again MM, assuming! Your assuming (incorrectly of course) that this simple-minded fool can even read.


dang doc, ya got me.... mm clutches chest falls over THUD!


Heart attacks NOT allowed on this thread! This said as he dials 911
Reply #39 Top
f Bush believed for a moment that Iraq had a way to strike back at America in response to a preemptive attack the way North Korea presumably would, then Bush would never have attacked Iraq. It is opportunism to attack a defenseless opponent. Do you think he would actually attack a country that could unleash weapons of mass destruction, such as North Korea? I seriously think not.


I think it's funny how people forget about China. China alone makes North Korea a complete different animal.
Reply #40 Top
Reply By: Enigmatic JesterPosted: Sunday, April 03, 2005f Bush believed for a moment that Iraq had a way to strike back at America in response to a preemptive attack the way North Korea presumably would, then Bush would never have attacked Iraq. It is opportunism to attack a defenseless opponent. Do you think he would actually attack a country that could unleash weapons of mass destruction, such as North Korea? I seriously think not.I think it's funny how people forget about China. China alone makes North


here here,, anyone that studies war would have know the us and nato forces would have trashed n.korea if not for the 10s of thousands of troops china sent in.
Reply #41 Top
here here,, anyone that studies war would have know the us and nato forces would have trashed n.korea if not for the 10s of thousands of troops china sent in


--No doubt, just imagine if a china-taiwan conflict escalates into war................................
Reply #42 Top
The problem for Bush is not liberals it is the choices he is making are not working. He chose to cut taxes while spending is increasing and creating a huge structural deficit. He saw the trade policy fail for eight years under Clinton and then continued to expand it with China and now Central America. He identified Afghanistan is the source of 9/11 and sent the preponderance of or military manpower into Iraq which had nothing to do with 9/11. It doesn't seem to me like Bush has a problem with the liberals but with himself!
Reply #43 Top
Reply By: COL GenePosted: Monday, April 04, 2005


did I hear {see} you admit clinton made a bad boo-boo. hmmmmmm
Reply #44 Top
Moderateman, you are indeed a dolt, of the mule type I might add.

Dr. Guy, why do you believe in fairy tales about the moral superiority of your wicked Country? A Country built on the immorality of slavery! The man steals your essence each day. He is sticking it to you while the Chinese and Indians conspire with the Saudis to control the oil. What happens when the oil dries up? How many Americans are you willingly to let die for oil? Bush and his oil cronies are withholding from the market place a source of energy that would once and for all put an end to the need for oil. But you Americans will not shout out in opposition to your servitude to the Arab princes of Arabia, even though righteous souls such as myself rail against this infamy. At the top of my lungs, I say smash the devil that I capitalism, that is oil.
Reply #45 Top
Reply By: Tarantula-X (Bob's devoted daughter)(Anonymous User)Posted: Monday, April 04, 2005Moderateman, you are indeed a dolt, of the mule type I might add.


in the words of my ol pappy, I got cher "dolt" right here, mutt!! as I grab my crotch and gesture. btw in New YORK city, the greatest city in the greatest country in the world, then term "MUTT" is considered reserved for pedaphiles, snitches, rats, and other forms of life a good newyorker would scrap off his shoe. MUTT!!
Reply #46 Top

The problem for Bush is not liberals it is the choices he is making are not working. He chose to cut taxes while spending is increasing and creating a huge structural deficit. He saw the trade policy fail for eight years under Clinton and then continued to expand it with China and now Central America. He identified Afghanistan is the source of 9/11 and sent the preponderance of or military manpower into Iraq which had nothing to do with 9/11. It doesn't seem to me like Bush has a problem with the liberals but with himself!


So then answer this question. If it was failing for 8 years then why didn't "bubba" shut it down? Or was that to much to hope for?