Tiles and Quality

from GalCiv2 Forums
So do big planets really matter anymore? say 5 crappy planets have the same amount of usable tiles as 2 good ones. So do 5 crappy planets == 2 good? Only real benifit I see is that it takes less colony ships for the 2 good
42,249 views 37 replies
Reply #1 from GalCiv2 Forums Top

Bigger planets have the potential to have more tiles.

Ultimately, it's about the planet class. And larger planets are more likely to be a higher planet class.

Reply #2 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
Im confused about the tile system, maybe i just need to look around the site and read more on it.

Adam.
Groupy 2 - Organize multiple applications into grouped tabs on your Windows desktop
Reply #3 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
ughts of course in order to avoid too much micriomanagement should only a few of those small planets be that way.
Reply #4 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
if" align=absMiddle border=0>

Reply #5 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
ill be able to target production centres to cripple the enemies ability to wage war (gotta love that Sun Tzu), and we will have to consider more carefully which worlds we focus our defences on if the tide of war turns against us.
Reply #6 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
we will actually have different planet sizes with different number of total tiles (eg 10x12, 8x10, 6x8, 4x6)?

If so this would be truely awesome!

Paul.
Reply #7 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
hen it will be a small overage for more but smaller worlds to be equal or better then big tile count worlds.
Reply #8 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
different planet may actaully be different sizes. This would equate to different sizes on the galatic map and also to different numbers of tiles,

Paul.
Reply #9 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
actic map should have nothing to do with planet quality.
Reply #10 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
ets will be present to stop the map becoming over cluttered with gas giants. Remember that with CG2 each planet takes up it's own square.

Paul.
Reply #11 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
bove. But it really depends on us to make it playable and fun at the same time.
Reply #12 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
dock.com/gc2/smiles/Smile.gif" border=0 ALIGN="absmiddle">
Reply #14 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
hat isn't to say that Mars doesn't have its own pluses, but based on GC tech, Jupiter would be more useful to a space faring society then Mars.
Reply #15 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
der=0 ALIGN="absmiddle">
Reply #16 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
implement any technology upgrades on your planets - it was abstracted, which was fine for me.

Speaking for myself, I would much rather micromanage my starfleet than my colonies. That's just my two cents.
Reply #17 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
I'm hoping we can change some tiles with Terraform technology form nonuseful to useful.
Reply #18 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
at is a tile building/cost issue. And we haven't gotten our orbital tileage slots at this time.
Reply #19 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
=0 ALIGN="absmiddle"> Burrowing.. yeah, sounds good. But it's still going to be a great deal more expensive to live somewhere like that. I guess that's why it cost so much to colonize a world below class 15 in Galciv.
Reply #20 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
d the number of tiles is the amount of use you get from the planet.

I like it.

PS. Saturn has water?
Reply #21 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
0 ALIGN="absmiddle">
Reply #23 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
order=0 ALIGN="absmiddle">
Reply #24 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
f" border=0 ALIGN="absmiddle">

Is there any hope for having the tiled planetary system be an option that can be turned off?
Reply #25 from GalCiv2 Forums Top
re shall be an option like that because that would require a complete rebalancing of all buildings there effects just for that single option.