Employers work the workmens comp system, costing everyone

Companies are cheating on workers' compensation, costing billions in added premiums-and leaving their employees at risk

I know that I'm gonna get slapped on this one and told that the problem is happening because we don't have enough regulators over-seeing employers and the insurance industry, but here goes anyway.

Headline is (as usual) linked.

Workers' Con

Companies are cheating on workers' compensation, costing billions in added premiums-and leaving their employees at risk.


Jorge Gomez was helping to build a two-story house on a Jacksonville, Fla.-area construction site owned by D.R. Horton in 2003 when a 24-foot wood beam fell and broke his neck. Gomez, who had crossed into the U.S. from Mexico illegally, was being paid $400 a week in cash from a subcontractor. Now a quadriplegic, the 23-year-old has amassed more than $1 million in hospital bills but has no way to pay them. Companies are supposed to cover all workers, even illegal ones. But his disability claims to the subcontractor and the home builder were denied. He is now suing $11 billion (sales) D.R. Horton, which insists it did nothing wrong and points the finger at the sub. Trial date: this fall.
Workers' comp is out of control again. Premium rates have risen 44% in the last three years, says the Insurance Information Institute, pushing total corporate costs to $80 billion annually. Along with rising medical costs, fraud is a swelling part of that bill, amounting to billions of dollars each year, says the institute's chief economist, Robert Hartwig. Some skulduggery still comes from people faking or exaggerating injuries. But employers cheat, too, using creative ways to underpay workers' comp insurance, driving up premiums for other businesses.
Judging by the number of suits by private and state insurers, the problem is getting worse. Fraud is particularly prevalent in the construction industry, especially among roofers, as well as in work-leasing companies and so-called professional employment organizations; PEOs collect a fee to coemploy and take responsibility for workers. The highest incidence of fraud seems to be among companies in California and Florida.
This month the U.S. attorney in Jacksonville plans to file indictments involving a PEO, according to sources familiar with the investigation, accusing it of pocketing $600 million or so, much of which was to have paid for workers' comp premiums. A federal grand jury in the Jacksonville case has heard evidence that the PEO collected fees and comp premium payouts from clients across the nation but never purchased insurance. Every state except Texas requires most businesses to insure all their employees. Some companies rely on their own ingenuity to cheat. Charles Yi, 62, stands accused of underreporting the number of employees on his payroll as a way of reducing his workers' comp premiums. According to a Los Angeles deputy district attorney, Yi committed fraud between 2000 and 2003, when his Natural Building Maintenance painted dorm rooms at UCLA and provided janitorial services at the Rose Bowl, claiming the work had been done by 18 employees when, in fact, it was the labor of at least 300. Yi pleaded not guilty in November and is awaiting trial.
A craftier way to avoid paying workers' compensation: Shift employees around phony companies. Miguel and Linda Delgado created a fake entity to hide staff at their San Antonio, Tex. janitorial outfit, Border Maintenance Services, thereby reducing workers' comp premiums, says a suit filed by its insurer, Texas Mutual. The allegedly bogus company, Del-Kleen, got fat state contracts by showing it had insured its workers against injury, a requirement for state government jobs in Texas. But, according to the complaint, the work was actually done by Border Maintenance's 450 employees. The company managed to avoid nearly $1 million in comp premiums. The Delgados were ordered to pay $1.6 million to Texas Mutual.
Another favorite trick: giving fake job titles to workers. James Duff pleaded guilty in January to fraudulently obtaining municipal contracts in Chicago. His Windy City Labor Service, which supplied temporary workers, ducked $3 million in workers' comp insurance premiums by reclassifying nearly all 2,100 workers toiling in warehouses and refuse centers as paper pushers, even though he knew they were temporary day laborers engaged in manual labor, says a federal indictment. Clerical jobs carried premium rates of near 35 cents per $100 of payroll, as opposed to $8 for muscle jobs, according to court papers. (The payroll used to calculate the rate can be capped as high as $84,500.) Duff is awaiting sentencing.
Hiding wages is a clever way to go-until you get caught. That, according to a suit filed by the California State Compensation Insurance Fund, was the intention behind Ideal Payroll Plus and Ideal Management, two Rancho Cucamonga, Calif. PEOs run as limited partnerships by David Clancy. The complaint alleges that by disguising half of the paid-out wages as distributions to partners, Clancy skirted $1.3 million in premium payments.
How did it work? The partnerships hired and leased employees to a Buick dealership and a local roofer, among others, says the suit, and paid some wages legitimately. An associate, Telma Moguel, set up a trust that was financed by the partnerships to funnel the rest of employee wages through the trust as "partnership income," as if it were a payout from an investment. A California court hit the PEOs with a $14.6 million default judgment in late December. Suits against Clancy and Moguel are pending; both deny wrongdoing.
"Premium scams milk workers' comp insurers out of untold millions," says James Quiggle at the Coalition Against Insurance Fraud, "depressing profits and forcing comp premiums higher for honest businesses." But there aren't enough cops to nab crooks. Jeffrey Korte, head of Florida's workers' comp fraud bureau, says his 26 investigators can't keep up.




... more at linked article

So many possible targets in this article and so little time.

First, for Mr. Jorge Gomez (first paragraph mentioned), sympathies for the injury, but also some anger at the idea that he was in the country illegally, and partly because of that, allowed himself to be taken advantage of by these crooked employers who weren't covering his insurance needs. Now, of course, others will pay for his needs in higher costs across the board.

For these employers, a wish that many would be crammed into some federally funded space with nice bars for doors and windows. Gaming the system in these manners costs everyone, and leaves the innocent unprotected. Many people are not able to question potential employers in advance to find out about a companies history in this area. Even if someone is inquisitive and checks on a company before going to work for them, this isn't necessarily information that would be easily available.

Perhaps the answer is more public disclosure of this information. More filing of the number of employees that are covered by workmens comp, and information like that so that public watchdog groups can cross reference information and help the government regulators keep these problems from occuring -- without having to employ thousands more in enforcement roles for the government.
1,728 views 3 replies
Reply #1 Top
Thanks for highlighting this, terp.

I know from personal experience that workers comp and disability insurance companies have almost across the board adopted as policy the posture that all claims are fraudulent until proven otherwise; almost all of them have gone into the premium-collection business as opposed to the insurance business. This is even true with many health insurance companies. As for Mr. Gomez's case, there may have been a paper trail documenting the subcontractor's obligation to hire only legal workers and to provide worker's comp insurance as conditions of the contract. There are laws in some states, I believe, that effectively put the burden back on the General Contractor, to avoid this very scenario - gives them fairly strong incentives to see that their subs are trustworthy. Time will tell.

As for individual employers using scams to minimize their premium costs, it's obviously dishonest but will probably continue to occur since there is a pretty much inexhaustible supply of dishonest folks out there. Most of the PEO industry is honest, just like most other industries, but there have been egregious scams using PEO's as the vehicle, and not just in premium-avoidance. As is the case with the thousands of uninsured motorists who get into accidents daily, those of us who are honest & do the right thing pay the price.

Cheers,
Daiwa
Reply #2 Top
I was reading (unfortunatley don't recall where, too many different sources during the day today, and it could have been any of them) of a poor customer that had to file a couple of Home owner's insurance claims within about a years time (couple = no more than 3 claims) and received notice that after having been a customer for many years, her policy was being dropped by the provider.

I've experienced similar problems myself. Back in 1999, after a freak snow-storm in the D.C. area, I basically totalled my little automobile when I spun out and did donuts in the middle of a busy thoroughfare. Thankfully there were non injuries, and no other vehicles were involved, but a hard smack against a curb did enough damage to my little car to require more repair work than the car was really worth. The insurance company paid for the repairs though, and I was left with a vehicle that was virtually worthless since the doors never sealed properly, even after multiple visits back to the repair shop and even with a guarantee from the insurance company to make things as good as new.

That accident was my second within about 16 months, the first having been a case of a resident of the trailer park where I live coming in the entry/exit to the park 3/4 of the way into my half of the road as I merged into the roadway to get into the roadway and head to work. I filed a claim because at the time my vehicle was then only about 1 year old, and the damage that was done to my car, though relatively minor and cosmetic was on the fog lamps and undercarriage. (Not terribly expensive, but still it was a claim).

My long time insurance provider, they of the farms in the states, sent me notice as renewal time rolled up after the second accident that I was being dropped as a customer. I had been with them for approximately 12 years at the time. I'd had a minor wreck many years before, and my wife had a fairly major one more recently, though still a few years back. I was told I could switch to MAIF (if you know what that is, it's insurance for uninsurable motorists, provided by the state of Maryland at a cost of a kings ransom), but couldn't stay on the policy I had for years. My wife was welcome as a customer, but I wasn't.

I tried to discuss it with the insurance agent/sales persons, but they weren't interested in interjecting. Even as I argued that the company was at a break even point with me given my 12 years of prior payments, it wasn't enough. Even as I argued that the company would have been smarter to raise my rates and keep me as a customer so I could pay them back for the payouts they had just made on my behalf. Nope, they had to drop me.

I wound up calling up another provider and got coverage for my wife and myself, even with a few dings on my record. I was amazed, as the company I went to had a reputation as one which wasn't interested in anyone without a perfect record, but they had been advertising that they'd work with people who had a few dings on their record, and I took up their offer. Now I smile every time I see a little lizard on the TV driving his car and walking into the office as the employee of the month.

I really generally despise insurers. No slight intended against people that work for them, but the premise as always seemed to be one of paying for something you were never really gonna be able to get your money's worth from. If you file a claim, your rates go up. If you don't file the claim and pay for something yourself, then you wasted your money paying premiums. It's a no win situation.

With that said though, I see worksmen comp. as a very necessary evil, and I am not at all pleased that there are too many people out there gaming the system and causing problems for innocent victims. I hope that these criminals share a cell block with the Ken Lay's of the world and even more so hope that once locked up, someone loses the key.
Reply #3 Top
Your experience is far from unique. The concept of spreading risk among large pools of individuals in the form of insurance is a quaint historical footnote. The only people who can get insurance, of a variety of types but especially health insurance, are the folks who don't need it - works just like bank loans. Things like MAIF only make it easier for the commercial insurance companies to cherry-pick, which is why they lobby so hard for them in the first place. That's why I go high-deductible collision coverage on my auto policy - I hate to pay for something unusable, too. I will say a good word or two about a certain military-oriented acronymical outfit - they will jack up your rates (what I consider unfairly, but who am I?) if you have a little string of bad luck (claims don't have to be your fault to get gigged), but it is rare for them to cancel you outright and their customer service is nearly flawless.

Cheers,
Daiwa